Diagree with RUUF. It will cause misuse and abuse of drug
K
Kevin Wee Kian Koon
10 years ago
1. Consult by a non-pharmacist in different sectors, what if non-pharmacists practices only based on their experiences but not pharmacology and clinical pharmacy knowledge? It will put risk in patient/customer life.
2. No indication/dosage state in prescriptions, it will make doubts to either pharmacist or patient if they tend to buy their meds in pharmacist, which put their life in risk.
3. If ni prescriptions is given to the patient, no identification purpose can be made by pharmacist, which prescribers may prescribe wrong dose or ignore drug interaction, which may put patient in hospital/out-patient in life-threatening condition.
N
Nur Ain Fitria
10 years ago
Make us believe, again.
S
SIA SZE CHONG
10 years ago
not agree as above mention.
N
Nurul khairiyah wanik
10 years ago
This RUUF show no respect to pharmacy career..
J
Jes chong
10 years ago
We r struggling.now. pls understand the situation n pity us as a professional.
A
ANAS
10 years ago
REJECT RUUF
T
Tee Khee Yuan
10 years ago
Lets hope the group of people who draft the RUUF never fall sick. Who does it benefit?
K
Kristina
10 years ago
These suggested regulations are not wise and should not be practice.
M
Mohan Raj Subramaniam
10 years ago
RUUF definately a backwards for pharmacy profession and patient safety.
H
helen ten
10 years ago
Governments Ignore the right of the People , RUUF should stop!
L
Liew Kian Kian
10 years ago
Strongly disagree with new RUUF
J
Jeremiah Chin Yew Chen
10 years ago
Practicing quality use of medicines is our right. Future pharmacist here
S
Sherilyn fenn karel
10 years ago
This RUUF shouldnt be allowed. It will only bring much hassle, allow prescribers more chances to violet drugs & blame it all pharmacists should any problem occurs. Why study pharmacy for 4 years then if only the work done is just that..
L
Lim Hui Shern
10 years ago
Support
K
Krishnapriya Ravi
10 years ago
I strongly disagree with the decisions made by RUUF. I feel that only a licensed pharmacist can do so.
Pls put things to just!
Strongly disagree with RUUF!
STRONGLY AGAINST RUUF
Diagree with RUUF. It will cause misuse and abuse of drug
1. Consult by a non-pharmacist in different sectors, what if non-pharmacists practices only based on their experiences but not pharmacology and clinical pharmacy knowledge? It will put risk in patient/customer life. 2. No indication/dosage state in prescriptions, it will make doubts to either pharmacist or patient if they tend to buy their meds in pharmacist, which put their life in risk. 3. If ni prescriptions is given to the patient, no identification purpose can be made by pharmacist, which prescribers may prescribe wrong dose or ignore drug interaction, which may put patient in hospital/out-patient in life-threatening condition.
Make us believe, again.
not agree as above mention.
This RUUF show no respect to pharmacy career..
We r struggling.now. pls understand the situation n pity us as a professional.
REJECT RUUF
Lets hope the group of people who draft the RUUF never fall sick. Who does it benefit?
These suggested regulations are not wise and should not be practice.
RUUF definately a backwards for pharmacy profession and patient safety.
Governments Ignore the right of the People , RUUF should stop!
Strongly disagree with new RUUF
Practicing quality use of medicines is our right. Future pharmacist here
This RUUF shouldnt be allowed. It will only bring much hassle, allow prescribers more chances to violet drugs & blame it all pharmacists should any problem occurs. Why study pharmacy for 4 years then if only the work done is just that..
Support
I strongly disagree with the decisions made by RUUF. I feel that only a licensed pharmacist can do so.
Maintain what the current benefit