'RUUF does NOT require medical doctors to issue compulsory prescriptions to patients. Patients can request for prescriptions if they want. '
Many doctors do not even know how to write proper, more so complete prescriptions - most prescriptions (the little that we do) 1) that come from clinics do not even come with letterheads let alone the doctor's stamp (who knows who actually signs it?) but instead the address stamp , 2) doctors in high street clinics tend to threaten/strike fear into their patients whom want to buy their medicines outside. Dermatologists especially are typically known to be unwilling to devulge what creams they dispense out to patients and prefer to keep them in the dark!
S
Sally Anne Khoo Siew bee
10 years ago
Not agree
J
John Ooi
10 years ago
It is totally wrong and can't be accepted that pharmaceutical compounding can be performed by non-pharmacist. Then what's the role of pharmacists? This will just lead to a lot of problems and errors.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This is not transformation but jeorpadising safety of the community/public.
H
Hafsah Mustapha
10 years ago
I strongly disagree with the amendment of the RUUF.
鄭
鄭 子揚
10 years ago
disagree
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I strongly disagree with the amendment of the RUUF.
N
Nurul Ainul Nabihah
10 years ago
-
H
Hii Win Nie
10 years ago
Reject new law!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I strongly disagree with the amendment of the RUUF. The aim for amending the law is to make it a better law for everyone. The new amendment of RUUF does not take into consideration of the consequences that might happen to the patients. It increases the risk of wrongful prescription of medicine to patients. Therefore, the amendment must be abolished.
L
Lee Mei Siew
10 years ago
This is such a ridiculous draft I ever see! We need to change to be better not worsen!
M
Mashood Ahmad Shah
10 years ago
I agree with the decision no 1 and 2 but i strongly disagree the rest of the decisions made by the Ministry of Health.Malaysia
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Risky implementation. Does not comply with the health and safety of people.
H
Husna
10 years ago
Semestinya akan berlaku penayalahgunaan ubat
L
Lim Jia Wen
10 years ago
I will not agree this new rule.
K
Khairuddin Bin Sungip
10 years ago
Against RUUF 2016 Bill
S
Soon Share Ting
10 years ago
Law supposed to be enforced to prioritize patient's safety. If this law were to be passed, pharmacist won't be needed in the future.
N
Ng Ke Hong
10 years ago
Dangerous changes. A lot of potential dangers not only to patients, a lot of potential lawsuits as well
I
Izhanis Ramli
10 years ago
Ini bukan cara yang betul untuk negara kita yang makin Maju.
N
Norain binti Rosli
10 years ago
Pharmacists are not allowed to diagnose. Why? We are not trained for it
Same principles for compounding.
Doctors should not be allowed to compound. Why? They are not trained for it
'RUUF does NOT require medical doctors to issue compulsory prescriptions to patients. Patients can request for prescriptions if they want. ' Many doctors do not even know how to write proper, more so complete prescriptions - most prescriptions (the little that we do) 1) that come from clinics do not even come with letterheads let alone the doctor's stamp (who knows who actually signs it?) but instead the address stamp , 2) doctors in high street clinics tend to threaten/strike fear into their patients whom want to buy their medicines outside. Dermatologists especially are typically known to be unwilling to devulge what creams they dispense out to patients and prefer to keep them in the dark!
Not agree
It is totally wrong and can't be accepted that pharmaceutical compounding can be performed by non-pharmacist. Then what's the role of pharmacists? This will just lead to a lot of problems and errors.
This is not transformation but jeorpadising safety of the community/public.
I strongly disagree with the amendment of the RUUF.
disagree
I strongly disagree with the amendment of the RUUF.
-
Reject new law!
I strongly disagree with the amendment of the RUUF. The aim for amending the law is to make it a better law for everyone. The new amendment of RUUF does not take into consideration of the consequences that might happen to the patients. It increases the risk of wrongful prescription of medicine to patients. Therefore, the amendment must be abolished.
This is such a ridiculous draft I ever see! We need to change to be better not worsen!
I agree with the decision no 1 and 2 but i strongly disagree the rest of the decisions made by the Ministry of Health.Malaysia
Risky implementation. Does not comply with the health and safety of people.
Semestinya akan berlaku penayalahgunaan ubat
I will not agree this new rule.
Against RUUF 2016 Bill
Law supposed to be enforced to prioritize patient's safety. If this law were to be passed, pharmacist won't be needed in the future.
Dangerous changes. A lot of potential dangers not only to patients, a lot of potential lawsuits as well
Ini bukan cara yang betul untuk negara kita yang makin Maju.
Pharmacists are not allowed to diagnose. Why? We are not trained for it Same principles for compounding. Doctors should not be allowed to compound. Why? They are not trained for it