Petition Against Rezoning General Plan Amendment 240053
639 Comments
K
Katie Burr
1 year ago
TODAY the same developer is pushing another plan initiation to rezone in the same area – trying to get okay at Riverside County Director’s Hearing at 1:30 Monday, January 13. This is ALL related – if you oppose the 240053 rezone, email immediately [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) to OPPOSE General Plan Amendment Initiation 240039 (Item 4.2 today) – another part of
dismantling the Wine Country Plan.
J
Jacqui L Pittman
1 year ago
We moved here to get away from the high-density hiding l housing. Now you want to rezone our rural was of like h
K
Kristen Kerr
1 year ago
We need more places like this.
B
Bonnie feiler
1 year ago
This will cause, more traffic, and take away from the beauty. That so many admire today
M
Michael Voye
1 year ago
Too much traffic as it is with little to no CHP. Everyday people cross the double solid yellow lines to illegally pass. With this new proposal traffic will more than double and will have a negative impact on everyone that lives here. Unfortunately an innocent person is going to get killed because of the greed of a developer.
N
NATAHA Lightfoot
1 year ago
Keep zoning as it is.
C
Christina
1 year ago
DO NOT REZONE THESE AREAS!!! PLEASE! NO! STOP!
R
Rob Britton
1 year ago
Not allowed use in WC would be detrimental to character of the area
V
Valentina Neufeld
1 year ago
This is purely profit-motivated, with zero concern for nature, wildlife, and logistics. There are plenty of other areas more suitable for high density or medium density housing. I am voting NO on this project and any changes in zoning.
A
Amy Procop
1 year ago
No big developers coming into our small community and putting stress on our local resources!!! Keep small towns small!
H
Heather Creed
1 year ago
NO
K
Kirsti Booth
1 year ago
I’ve been here 43 yrs. We bought lg acreage to avoid exactly these types of developments. This is a direct contradiction to the general plan.
B
brian wear
1 year ago
DO NOT REZONE THESE AREAS!!!
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
This area is NOT prime for high density housing. Infrastructure will definitely not support it. Water, wildlife, roads, etc. My vote is NO!
R
Rosalynd Wilhelm
1 year ago
No
K
Karina Canseco
1 year ago
STOP
A
Anonymous
1 year ago
KEEP SAFE RURAL!!
M
Marilyn Horton
1 year ago
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous on Mesa due to existing residents using road to travel to Temecula. Hills prevent visibility of other residents entering Mesa from existing driveways and cross streets. People drive too fast and accidents have happened. No more traffic. Medium and high density housing tracts do not belong in rural areas. No sewers, lighting, no wide roads. Wrong place for this development!!!
TODAY the same developer is pushing another plan initiation to rezone in the same area – trying to get okay at Riverside County Director’s Hearing at 1:30 Monday, January 13. This is ALL related – if you oppose the 240053 rezone, email immediately [email protected] (mailto:[email protected]) to OPPOSE General Plan Amendment Initiation 240039 (Item 4.2 today) – another part of dismantling the Wine Country Plan.
We moved here to get away from the high-density hiding l housing. Now you want to rezone our rural was of like h
We need more places like this.
This will cause, more traffic, and take away from the beauty. That so many admire today
Too much traffic as it is with little to no CHP. Everyday people cross the double solid yellow lines to illegally pass. With this new proposal traffic will more than double and will have a negative impact on everyone that lives here. Unfortunately an innocent person is going to get killed because of the greed of a developer.
Keep zoning as it is.
DO NOT REZONE THESE AREAS!!! PLEASE! NO! STOP!
Not allowed use in WC would be detrimental to character of the area
This is purely profit-motivated, with zero concern for nature, wildlife, and logistics. There are plenty of other areas more suitable for high density or medium density housing. I am voting NO on this project and any changes in zoning.
No big developers coming into our small community and putting stress on our local resources!!! Keep small towns small!
NO
I’ve been here 43 yrs. We bought lg acreage to avoid exactly these types of developments. This is a direct contradiction to the general plan.
DO NOT REZONE THESE AREAS!!!
This area is NOT prime for high density housing. Infrastructure will definitely not support it. Water, wildlife, roads, etc. My vote is NO!
No
STOP
KEEP SAFE RURAL!!
Traffic is already heavy and dangerous on Mesa due to existing residents using road to travel to Temecula. Hills prevent visibility of other residents entering Mesa from existing driveways and cross streets. People drive too fast and accidents have happened. No more traffic. Medium and high density housing tracts do not belong in rural areas. No sewers, lighting, no wide roads. Wrong place for this development!!!
I am very against this development.
Save our city and surroundings