STOP KANSAS CITY FROM ALLOWING BRINSHORE DEVELOPMENT HOUSING TO BUILD BY NORTH PLATTE PURCHASE NEIGHBORHOODS
1,307 Comments
N
Noah Woodward
9 years ago
I want my property value to go up rather than going down cause of a low income housing development. Against this movement
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
In 2016, over 4400 individuals lived in public housing in Kansas City, Missouri. Approximately, 12% are White, 79% are African-American and 9% are of other races. Approximately, 48% of those living in public housing are under the age of eighteen. Based upon statistics we receive from the Kansas City Police Department, over the past ten years we have averaged approximately 7.9 part 1 & part 2 crimes per 100 people. Based upon KCPD 2016 annual report, KCMO averaged 9.56 part 1 & part 2 crimes per 100 people in 2016. Source -
Edwin Lowndes
Executive Director
Housing Authority of Kansas City
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
There is not enough resources in this area to accommodate another high-density unit. Green space is a good thing in a city, not a sign of just more room to develop.
C
Cheryl Bordewick
9 years ago
Please do not turn the Barry Road corridor into what Independence Avenue became. Build this housing elsewhere and provide transportation to assist people getting to work.
R
Roxana Smith
9 years ago
This area is what we chose to live in because similar people with the same income are in this area. It would disrupt the balance that we have in kansas city north.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
No thank you.
L
Lynnette Lockhart
9 years ago
for ALL the reasons indicated, I am vehemently opposed to this, and will engage actively in any legal measures to prevent this from occurring!
J
Jim Martin
9 years ago
64152
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
This is absurd!
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Regardless of renovating existing housing or building new, they will be destroyed within a very short period of time. Windows broken, cars on cinder blocks, crowded corners. As our housing values plummet, will taxes decrease as well?? Probably not, we still have to provide new housing and all services, free of charge, for the ungrateful.
R
Robert Howell
9 years ago
No way should this be done!!!
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
64152
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
64154
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
64154. Absolutely no!
D
Diane Riley
9 years ago
I read an article that this development would add an additional 20,000 residents just within this high-density neighborhood. Why would anyone want to build a modern day projects and have the same issue that Chicago and LA has in the north land?
K
Kim Jones
9 years ago
Nope
D
Darlene Nielson
9 years ago
64153
J
Jessica mcclain
9 years ago
Do not allow more low income housing in the northland
I want my property value to go up rather than going down cause of a low income housing development. Against this movement
In 2016, over 4400 individuals lived in public housing in Kansas City, Missouri. Approximately, 12% are White, 79% are African-American and 9% are of other races. Approximately, 48% of those living in public housing are under the age of eighteen. Based upon statistics we receive from the Kansas City Police Department, over the past ten years we have averaged approximately 7.9 part 1 & part 2 crimes per 100 people. Based upon KCPD 2016 annual report, KCMO averaged 9.56 part 1 & part 2 crimes per 100 people in 2016. Source - Edwin Lowndes Executive Director Housing Authority of Kansas City
There is not enough resources in this area to accommodate another high-density unit. Green space is a good thing in a city, not a sign of just more room to develop.
Please do not turn the Barry Road corridor into what Independence Avenue became. Build this housing elsewhere and provide transportation to assist people getting to work.
This area is what we chose to live in because similar people with the same income are in this area. It would disrupt the balance that we have in kansas city north.
No thank you.
for ALL the reasons indicated, I am vehemently opposed to this, and will engage actively in any legal measures to prevent this from occurring!
64152
This is absurd!
Regardless of renovating existing housing or building new, they will be destroyed within a very short period of time. Windows broken, cars on cinder blocks, crowded corners. As our housing values plummet, will taxes decrease as well?? Probably not, we still have to provide new housing and all services, free of charge, for the ungrateful.
No way should this be done!!!
64152
64154
64154. Absolutely no!
I read an article that this development would add an additional 20,000 residents just within this high-density neighborhood. Why would anyone want to build a modern day projects and have the same issue that Chicago and LA has in the north land?
Nope
64153
Do not allow more low income housing in the northland
Nope
Nope