Language study is an essential component of doctoral education in the humanities, and demonstrated language competency is an important requirement for the granting of the PhD degree. In today’s digital world, on-line dictionaries have become the standard reference tool for translating texts from foreign languages. It is reasonable to expect that at Penn, language exams will allow the use of such dictionaries and be composed with a keyboard rather than with pen and bluebook.
In AY 2013-14, the Emerald software program was specifically configured to allow graduate students to take language exams on their laptops with access to a designated “white list” of on-line foreign-language dictionaries while blocking all other websites (such as Google Translate and sites that might contain English translations of the exam documents). That software worked extremely well and represented the culmination of an effort to meet the needs of various constituencies.
In March 2014, it was unilaterally announced that Emerald would be discontinued because its designers - a pair of Wharton students working with Penn’s IT division - concluded that it was not a “viable commercial product.”
Penn is not a for-profit institution, and the ability to generate income cannot and should not be the sole factor in our educational decisions, including those that involve technology.
We the undersigned urgently request that Penn provide a system for on-line exams equivalent to Emerald, with controlled access to on-line dictionaries, for doctoral students who must demonstrate foreign-language competency. Global eminence in the 21st century - one of Penn’s stated goals - requires no less.
The conversation regarding digital tools in the classroom continues to gain momentum as departments reflect on the necessity of modern assessment standards. I am currently organizing the feedback gathered from various schools to present a unified case for reinstating efficient exam protocols. Your contributions remain essential for demonstrating that academic rigor and updated technology are not mutually exclusive.
August 26, 2014
The response to this proposal has been profound and underscores the clear necessity for modernizing our examination standards. Momentum is building because the collective consensus among graduate students is impossible to ignore.
6 Comments
R
Rachel Ross
11 years ago
Featured
Seriously? We have the software already then they just scrap it. This is so frustrating.
D
David Lund
11 years ago
Featured
Using a dictionary online is standard practice for research anyway. Why make the exam harder than the actual work?
M
Mike Sandoval
11 years ago
Featured
Just because something isnt a big money maker doesnt mean its not useful. Keep the tech updated for the grad students.
S
Sarah Walsh
11 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous to go back to pen and paper in this day and age. Students should be using the tools that are actually relevant to their research.
E
Elena Achebe
11 years ago
Featured
My handwriting is terrible and I know im not the only one. Using a keyboard makes so much more sense for language exams.
J
Jason Edwards
11 years ago
Featured
Penn needs to stop worrying about commercial viability and start worrying about what helps the students actually finish their degrees.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
100 signatures.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via
.
Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Language study is an essential component of doctoral education in the humanities, and demonstrated language competency is an important requirement for the granting of the PhD degree. In today’s digital world, on-line dictionaries have become the standard reference tool for translating texts from foreign languages. It is reasonable to expect that at Penn, language exams will allow the use of such dictionaries and be composed with a keyboard rather than with pen and bluebook.
In AY 2013-14, the Emerald software program was specifically configured to allow graduate students to take language exams on their laptops with access to a designated “white list” of on-line foreign-language dictionaries while blocking all other websites (such as Google Translate and sites that might contain English translations of the exam documents). That software worked extremely well and represented the culmination of an effort to meet the needs of various constituencies.
In March 2014, it was unilaterally announced that Emerald would be discontinued because its designers - a pair of Wharton students working with Penn’s IT division - concluded that it was not a “viable commercial product.”
Penn is not a for-profit institution, and the ability to generate income cannot and should not be the sole factor in our educational decisions, including those that involve technology.
We the undersigned urgently request that Penn provide a system for on-line exams equivalent to Emerald, with controlled access to on-line dictionaries, for doctoral students who must demonstrate foreign-language competency. Global eminence in the 21st century - one of Penn’s stated goals - requires no less.
The conversation regarding digital tools in the classroom continues to gain momentum as departments reflect on the necessity of modern assessment standards. I am currently organizing the feedback gathered from various schools to present a unified case for reinstating efficient exam protocols. Your contributions remain essential for demonstrating that academic rigor and updated technology are not mutually exclusive.
August 26, 2014
The response to this proposal has been profound and underscores the clear necessity for modernizing our examination standards. Momentum is building because the collective consensus among graduate students is impossible to ignore.
6 Comments
R
Rachel Ross
11 years ago
Featured
Seriously? We have the software already then they just scrap it. This is so frustrating.
D
David Lund
11 years ago
Featured
Using a dictionary online is standard practice for research anyway. Why make the exam harder than the actual work?
M
Mike Sandoval
11 years ago
Featured
Just because something isnt a big money maker doesnt mean its not useful. Keep the tech updated for the grad students.
S
Sarah Walsh
11 years ago
Featured
Ridiculous to go back to pen and paper in this day and age. Students should be using the tools that are actually relevant to their research.
E
Elena Achebe
11 years ago
Featured
My handwriting is terrible and I know im not the only one. Using a keyboard makes so much more sense for language exams.
J
Jason Edwards
11 years ago
Featured
Penn needs to stop worrying about commercial viability and start worrying about what helps the students actually finish their degrees.
Help this petition grow
Share it with friends to help reach
100 signatures.
Your share link
Couldn't copy automatically. Long-press to copy:
Share directly
Sign Petition
We never post to your account. Social sign-in is used only to verify your signature.
or sign with Email
Add a comment?
Your signature will be added via . Tell others why you're signing — it's optional.
Signing with Google or Facebook verifies your signature instantly — no email needed.
By signing, you accept our Terms and Privacy Policy and agree to occasional emails about petitions. Unsubscribe anytime.
Seriously? We have the software already then they just scrap it. This is so frustrating.