First and second row homeowners do not own the beach. I don't see how this assessment is fair by having first and second row home owner's pay for the benefit of everyone else. If everyone has the same benefit of using the beach, everyone should pay for the 4 year assessment by implementing a tax for all.
K
Kay Gillis
5 years ago
Due diligence is always a good idea.
G
Gale Fulbright
5 years ago
This appears to be a crime against Mother Nature. I am against being unfairly charged for a beach that is unowned by homeowners. Please stop the action to excessively and unfairly charge homeowners who do not own property on the beach and reconsider your conscious.
D
Doug Lilley
5 years ago
Have owned our home on Oak Island for almost 40 years. If this assessment goes through in its present state, we won’t be able to afford Oak Island anymore. Had hoped to pass this home to the third and maybe fourth generation, but I feel in my heart that the family beach home is not what the Town Council wants anymore. What they are looking for is income producing properties.
J
Josephine Dezarn
5 years ago
I am a full time resident. I am retired and do not get any extra income from rentals.
M
Mary Martin
5 years ago
I think there are other avenues to explore to raise funds vs the homeowners bearing a $40 million assessment.
J
Jason Beaulieu
5 years ago
Let's make this fair to all and all of us will continue to enjoy Oak Island
K
Karen E Clement
5 years ago
While I agree the beachfront homes should be taxed at a higher rate, I cannot see the benefit of a 4 year assessment. The storms will continue and the beach front homes will be damaged. You cannot stop the ocean or the sand moving. We are wasting money. If the people on the beachfront want to maintain an ocean front home, they should pay.
J
Jennifer Deese
5 years ago
1918 E Beach Se
S
Sharon Fiore
5 years ago
I agree with the above comments.
J
Janice Issa
5 years ago
Please stop with the plan of charging front row homeowners excessively and not getting money from Brunswick County and State of NC. Do what is right. Build a jetty!!!
D
David Iannucci
5 years ago
The beach is not owned by ocean front or second row property owners and they already pay significantly higher taxes that purport to contribute to beach nourishment - where are those funds? The current assessment is an embarrassment and inexcusable.
D
Donna Davis
5 years ago
This is ridiculous!! STOP THE INSANITY!! You can cannot stop Mother Nature. Why do you want to spend more money on something that can and will change again in six months.
M
Mike Yeley
5 years ago
I will only be indirectly affected by this but do feel that the process is being rushed. The risk of unintended consequences for actions like these is high. I'd add to the list that the additional steps beyond what have been taken be enumerated for the public to see to avoid a meaningless pause with the same results trotted out 60 days later.
A
Anne Bynum
5 years ago
Need to hit the pause button
D
Diane Wilkerson
5 years ago
If we don’t stop this People will be moving off Island. No one can afford to live here
R
Russ Baumann
5 years ago
Remember...If it 'ain't' broke, don't fix it.
If you must however, then seek help from funding sources.
A
Amy Garcia
5 years ago
Oak Island property owner
J
Jennifer Willard
5 years ago
I own two lots; one oceanfront and one on the 2nd row. Though owning beachfront property comes with certain risk (which I am willing to take), this plan feels very rushed and not thought out. If I am required to foot the bill to give others a beautiful beach, I at least deserve answers as to when my private walkover can be rebuilt. The plan as stated will have many long term negative effects for the town of OKI. There has got to be a plan that is more equitable for ALL who use the beach.
B
Betty Stalls
5 years ago
Explore other fund sources to alleviate the burden on the permanent residents and homeowners
First and second row homeowners do not own the beach. I don't see how this assessment is fair by having first and second row home owner's pay for the benefit of everyone else. If everyone has the same benefit of using the beach, everyone should pay for the 4 year assessment by implementing a tax for all.
Due diligence is always a good idea.
This appears to be a crime against Mother Nature. I am against being unfairly charged for a beach that is unowned by homeowners. Please stop the action to excessively and unfairly charge homeowners who do not own property on the beach and reconsider your conscious.
Have owned our home on Oak Island for almost 40 years. If this assessment goes through in its present state, we won’t be able to afford Oak Island anymore. Had hoped to pass this home to the third and maybe fourth generation, but I feel in my heart that the family beach home is not what the Town Council wants anymore. What they are looking for is income producing properties.
I am a full time resident. I am retired and do not get any extra income from rentals.
I think there are other avenues to explore to raise funds vs the homeowners bearing a $40 million assessment.
Let's make this fair to all and all of us will continue to enjoy Oak Island
While I agree the beachfront homes should be taxed at a higher rate, I cannot see the benefit of a 4 year assessment. The storms will continue and the beach front homes will be damaged. You cannot stop the ocean or the sand moving. We are wasting money. If the people on the beachfront want to maintain an ocean front home, they should pay.
1918 E Beach Se
I agree with the above comments.
Please stop with the plan of charging front row homeowners excessively and not getting money from Brunswick County and State of NC. Do what is right. Build a jetty!!!
The beach is not owned by ocean front or second row property owners and they already pay significantly higher taxes that purport to contribute to beach nourishment - where are those funds? The current assessment is an embarrassment and inexcusable.
This is ridiculous!! STOP THE INSANITY!! You can cannot stop Mother Nature. Why do you want to spend more money on something that can and will change again in six months.
I will only be indirectly affected by this but do feel that the process is being rushed. The risk of unintended consequences for actions like these is high. I'd add to the list that the additional steps beyond what have been taken be enumerated for the public to see to avoid a meaningless pause with the same results trotted out 60 days later.
Need to hit the pause button
If we don’t stop this People will be moving off Island. No one can afford to live here
Remember...If it 'ain't' broke, don't fix it. If you must however, then seek help from funding sources.
Oak Island property owner
I own two lots; one oceanfront and one on the 2nd row. Though owning beachfront property comes with certain risk (which I am willing to take), this plan feels very rushed and not thought out. If I am required to foot the bill to give others a beautiful beach, I at least deserve answers as to when my private walkover can be rebuilt. The plan as stated will have many long term negative effects for the town of OKI. There has got to be a plan that is more equitable for ALL who use the beach.
Explore other fund sources to alleviate the burden on the permanent residents and homeowners