I gave them a chance. 3x they have rejected my registration because it is a certified copy (ordered thru the very link Reliant provided)They can't be bothered to read 10 seconds into the document to see the address is correct. My patience has expired. Like all poorly executed plans, this is a fail.
K
Katey Causey
7 years ago
I have a 3-bedroom unit with 4 people & 4 cars. Allowing only 1 permit per unit is not feasible and will be a deterrent to future buyers with renters and families. If everyone is fighting for one parking space per unit, then I vote for ASSIGNED parking spaces. Problem solved. Each unit gets one assigned parking spot. It’s fair to everyone and eliminates the problem of people saying there’s nowhere to park. It eliminates the need for parking permits, extra fees, apps, third-party companies, limiting guests, and privacy invasions. Stop saying “Oh this idea won’t work because the 914 spaces aren’t fairly distributed.” Well you can’t have your cake & eat it too. You want one spot per unit? Assign them. Let the rest be first-come first-serve. I’d happily take garage inspections over any permit program.
D
Denise Chisum
7 years ago
This program contains numerous violations to Our CCR's and California Law! There is NO data to support any of this!! There has only been "Because we said so" from this Board. Where is the supporting data? Why hasn't this Board corrected the violations to our CCR's and the Laws of California? What is the purpose for having to have all of this Personal Information? I do not support the program as it has been forced upon us!!
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Seems fair enough.......
M
Mike Chambers
7 years ago
Featured
First, I want to thank the board and the committee for trying so hard to come up with a good solution to our parking problems. For me, I believe it is best to allow one parking permit for each unit. If a unit wants to purchase ONE 'extra' parking permit, they should have to supply the reason and pay a community/board approved extra annual fee.
R
Regina F Sternberg
7 years ago
We need to have two car parked inside the unit.
I agree we do not need to have all the private info for getting a parking ticket.
I talked to Reliance and they have several ways to impose parking rules that are not so invasive in our privacy
C
Carl Blankenburg
7 years ago
Common Sense: 1 unit = 1 permit
F
Fred Schmidt
7 years ago
Someone finally used the proper Math.
Lets clean the garage.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
ONE permit per household please
E
Elise Fischer
7 years ago
I want to add that the current program is a complete invasion of privacy. There are other ways to achieve the same and without getting so much into people's personal business who lives there who's card is where the car is registered this should be private. Instead it is going to probably three different third-party vendors, Reliant parking, the association, and possibly either a patrol service and/or the board numbers. People shouldn't have to share their private business to get quote an exception. The exceptions are also becoming an administrative burden to staff that could be spending their time on other critical issues. It still creates a free-for-all with many more cars than parking spaces on a first-come first-serve basis and favors people who have someone living at home that can jockey cars around, preventing neighbors with a right to space from having access to one late at night. There should be more fairness. If people have three cars they still have access to two parking spaces at their own unit plus one equals three. If people need four spaces that takes away the need from a neighbor that also needs a parking space. We need to be fair to the entire community and with the common area belonging to everyone.
T
Tobie Cardino
7 years ago
Featured
One permit per household? No way! Not enough parking on Santa Vittoria! This would cause more hardship then help.
Stop trying to hurt 3 and 4 family households please! Our daughters and senior citizens are counting on you!
I gave them a chance. 3x they have rejected my registration because it is a certified copy (ordered thru the very link Reliant provided)They can't be bothered to read 10 seconds into the document to see the address is correct. My patience has expired. Like all poorly executed plans, this is a fail.
I have a 3-bedroom unit with 4 people & 4 cars. Allowing only 1 permit per unit is not feasible and will be a deterrent to future buyers with renters and families. If everyone is fighting for one parking space per unit, then I vote for ASSIGNED parking spaces. Problem solved. Each unit gets one assigned parking spot. It’s fair to everyone and eliminates the problem of people saying there’s nowhere to park. It eliminates the need for parking permits, extra fees, apps, third-party companies, limiting guests, and privacy invasions. Stop saying “Oh this idea won’t work because the 914 spaces aren’t fairly distributed.” Well you can’t have your cake & eat it too. You want one spot per unit? Assign them. Let the rest be first-come first-serve. I’d happily take garage inspections over any permit program.
This program contains numerous violations to Our CCR's and California Law! There is NO data to support any of this!! There has only been "Because we said so" from this Board. Where is the supporting data? Why hasn't this Board corrected the violations to our CCR's and the Laws of California? What is the purpose for having to have all of this Personal Information? I do not support the program as it has been forced upon us!!
Seems fair enough.......
First, I want to thank the board and the committee for trying so hard to come up with a good solution to our parking problems. For me, I believe it is best to allow one parking permit for each unit. If a unit wants to purchase ONE 'extra' parking permit, they should have to supply the reason and pay a community/board approved extra annual fee.
We need to have two car parked inside the unit. I agree we do not need to have all the private info for getting a parking ticket. I talked to Reliance and they have several ways to impose parking rules that are not so invasive in our privacy
Common Sense: 1 unit = 1 permit
Someone finally used the proper Math. Lets clean the garage.
ONE permit per household please
I want to add that the current program is a complete invasion of privacy. There are other ways to achieve the same and without getting so much into people's personal business who lives there who's card is where the car is registered this should be private. Instead it is going to probably three different third-party vendors, Reliant parking, the association, and possibly either a patrol service and/or the board numbers. People shouldn't have to share their private business to get quote an exception. The exceptions are also becoming an administrative burden to staff that could be spending their time on other critical issues. It still creates a free-for-all with many more cars than parking spaces on a first-come first-serve basis and favors people who have someone living at home that can jockey cars around, preventing neighbors with a right to space from having access to one late at night. There should be more fairness. If people have three cars they still have access to two parking spaces at their own unit plus one equals three. If people need four spaces that takes away the need from a neighbor that also needs a parking space. We need to be fair to the entire community and with the common area belonging to everyone.
One permit per household? No way! Not enough parking on Santa Vittoria! This would cause more hardship then help. Stop trying to hurt 3 and 4 family households please! Our daughters and senior citizens are counting on you!
This is much more equitable.
Because we need some common sense around here!