Skip to main content

Opposition to Speculative Development in Weedon

240 Comments

S
Siobhan Hoare
12 years ago

The village can't cope with the traffic at present, with the additional properties it will become impossible

R
Roger Jackson
12 years ago

This is a plan without a plan

P
Patricia Ann Jackson
12 years ago

We are against this simply because it is a plan without planning

T
Tricia Halley
12 years ago

Just 50 Houses would be enough to cause gridlock at peak times let alone this many.

J
Jean Ward
12 years ago

The development is too large for the village

T
Tony Ward
12 years ago

The proposed development is far too large for a village and would have a significant impact on residents lives

K
Kevin Snowdin
12 years ago Featured

We strongly object to this development. 1) The village facilities cannot sustain any more large scale development. 2) Already supporting outlying villages for Doctors, P.O., Dentist etc. 3) This is greenbelt & agricultural land

C
Carl Read
12 years ago

We are totally against the proposed development, there is no way that Weedon could accommodate all these new properties. New Street is not wide enough to allow the construction vehicles to access the site either.

S
Sarah Read
12 years ago

We are totally against the proposed development, there is no way that Weedon could accommodate all these new properties. New Street is not wide enough to allow the construction vehicles to access the site either.

S
Shirley Read
12 years ago

We are totally against the proposed development, there is no way that Weedon could accommodate all these new properties. New Street is not wide enough to allow the construction vehicles to access the site either.

C
Christine Radford
12 years ago

We have had more than enough houses built in weedon in the last 25 years

T
Tony Pettifer
12 years ago

Roads, Sewers & School Cannot Cope

V
Valerie Robinson
12 years ago

The drains, roads and services (doctors, school, chemists etc.) already used to full capacity & could not cope with an extra 150 families.

A
Ann Snowdin
12 years ago

Starmers row is 50 yards to our left & the builders yard next door are good developments but this 155 houses is wrong.

K
Kevin Snowdin
12 years ago

We strongly object to this development. 1) The village facilities cannot sustain any more large scale development. 2) Already supporting outlying villages for Doctors, P.O., Dentist etc. 3) This is greenbelt & agricultural land.

K
Kath Charlett
12 years ago

My main concerns regarding the proposed development is that it is too large, whether the village can cope with the increased volume of traffic, and the impact on it's infrastructure.

A
Anonymous
12 years ago Featured

i think Weedon The has done their bit for the housing market over the years we have doubled in size since i was a child not totally against building houses but this is far too big for our village .The doctors,school,roads and sewage just will not cope.GLADMANS JUST LEAVE US ALONE!!!

M
Mary Andrew
12 years ago

I think the village roads are already struggling to cope with the amount of traffic and it would be inadvisable to increase this by what could easily be 150 -300 cars. It would cause real problems over the bridge and at the plume crossroads and also getting out of the village onto the A5.

R
Ron Lock
12 years ago

The traffic in New Street is already a problem. The additional 150 houses can be expected to add at least 200 additional cars. That could be an extra 300-400 journeys a day along New Street. The village centre cannot cope with that. Many of the new houses are likely to bought bought by younger couples so there could well be over 100 or so small children needing schooling. How will the village school cope with the influx. The extra houses may well mean that the surgery will have over 300 new patients. How will they provide a good service in view of the extra workload.

M
Michelle Anderson
12 years ago

Typical - build the houses then leave the residents to deal with the chaos - total lack of proper thought and consideration