Opposition to Lynch Canyon Greenmilk LLC Manufacturing, Processing, Testing, Cloning, Dispensary Industry
352 Comments
J
Julie McAninch
5 years ago
Adamantly opposed. Please see email.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
I don't see the need for this to be so close to Oak Shores. We don't want it.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
No! We don't want pot farms across from Oak Shores!
L
Laurel Heinz
5 years ago
Oak Shores
378/102 & 378/101
R
Richard Williams
5 years ago
Oak Shores vacation home strongly opposed.
G
Gary R Stout
5 years ago
2457 Captains Walk
Bradley, CA. 93426. 380/037
D
Delores Vicki Carr
5 years ago
I strongly disagree with the Negative Declaration and find it so alarming that our County Planning Department
finds this Marijuana Plantation of NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON OAK SHORES AND ALL OF THE FAMILY RANCHES AND HOMES NEARBY WHO WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE FALLOUT FROM THESE COMPANIES THAT CAUSE US SO MUCH GRIEF!!!!
C
Craig Stolz
5 years ago
I am vehemently apposed to this proposed use of the property located on Lynch Canyon by Greenmilk LLC for the purpose of cultivating and manufacturing cannabis and/ or cannabis products.
T
TRACI ROBINSON
5 years ago
Go somewhere else! We don't need that kind of business in our area, disturbing our wildlife, polluting our water sources, disturbing the quiet. STRONGLY OPPOSED!
C
Carol Anthony
5 years ago
Send them to Greenfield. The "Cannabis" industry has already ruined that town. Smelled it lately?
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
Oak Shores Tract 379 Lot 27
M
Mark R Parsons
5 years ago
We strongly oppose! Besides the perspectives other have mentioned, I strongly believe this might contaminate our water supply that is already fragile enough!
S
Stephen Andreae
5 years ago
Track 378 Lot 74
We appose this installation for the following reasons and some not listed here:
1. Increase in traffic and accidents on Lynch Canyon and Inter-lake.
2. Loss of the privacy offered by rural environment.
3. Likely increase in crime and/or disturbances.
4. likely increase in trash and other clutter along roads.
5. Decrease in property values.
6. Negative impact on animal life in the area.
7. Increase in odors and pollution.
L
Lori Schneider
5 years ago
I already have to live with this same situation in Santa Barbara across the road from our property and I have NOTHING positive to say about these encroaching developments. The amount of water they use is enormous, the constant heavy skunk odor extremely unpleasant, the traffic and parking situation is problematic, as well as constant lookie loos checking it out. We are going to the lake to get away from these places, not to vacation or retire by them
M
Mark A Vock
5 years ago
Strongly oppose for the sake of our environment, health, property values, and overall safety. Oak Shores. Tract 379 Lot 168 and Tract 379 Lot 058
J
james and sandra rice
5 years ago
strongly oppossed
K
Karen Gellert
5 years ago
This is outrageous from many perspectives: environmental, health, to close to a small family oriented community, traffic, etc. This needs to be stopped.
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
This has gone far enough, SLO County!!! How dare you do this to our communities!!
M
Michael Cann
5 years ago
Michael and Amy Cann
Tract 381
Lot 229
M
Mike Bruno
5 years ago
I strongly oppose this use in our neighborhood.it will just bring more traffic and harm to our natural habitat.
Adamantly opposed. Please see email.
I don't see the need for this to be so close to Oak Shores. We don't want it.
No! We don't want pot farms across from Oak Shores!
Oak Shores 378/102 & 378/101
Oak Shores vacation home strongly opposed.
2457 Captains Walk Bradley, CA. 93426. 380/037
I strongly disagree with the Negative Declaration and find it so alarming that our County Planning Department finds this Marijuana Plantation of NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON OAK SHORES AND ALL OF THE FAMILY RANCHES AND HOMES NEARBY WHO WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE FALLOUT FROM THESE COMPANIES THAT CAUSE US SO MUCH GRIEF!!!!
I am vehemently apposed to this proposed use of the property located on Lynch Canyon by Greenmilk LLC for the purpose of cultivating and manufacturing cannabis and/ or cannabis products.
Go somewhere else! We don't need that kind of business in our area, disturbing our wildlife, polluting our water sources, disturbing the quiet. STRONGLY OPPOSED!
Send them to Greenfield. The "Cannabis" industry has already ruined that town. Smelled it lately?
Oak Shores Tract 379 Lot 27
We strongly oppose! Besides the perspectives other have mentioned, I strongly believe this might contaminate our water supply that is already fragile enough!
Track 378 Lot 74 We appose this installation for the following reasons and some not listed here: 1. Increase in traffic and accidents on Lynch Canyon and Inter-lake. 2. Loss of the privacy offered by rural environment. 3. Likely increase in crime and/or disturbances. 4. likely increase in trash and other clutter along roads. 5. Decrease in property values. 6. Negative impact on animal life in the area. 7. Increase in odors and pollution.
I already have to live with this same situation in Santa Barbara across the road from our property and I have NOTHING positive to say about these encroaching developments. The amount of water they use is enormous, the constant heavy skunk odor extremely unpleasant, the traffic and parking situation is problematic, as well as constant lookie loos checking it out. We are going to the lake to get away from these places, not to vacation or retire by them
Strongly oppose for the sake of our environment, health, property values, and overall safety. Oak Shores. Tract 379 Lot 168 and Tract 379 Lot 058
strongly oppossed
This is outrageous from many perspectives: environmental, health, to close to a small family oriented community, traffic, etc. This needs to be stopped.
This has gone far enough, SLO County!!! How dare you do this to our communities!!
Michael and Amy Cann Tract 381 Lot 229
I strongly oppose this use in our neighborhood.it will just bring more traffic and harm to our natural habitat.