Skip to main content

Opposition to Lynch Canyon Greenmilk LLC Manufacturing, Processing, Testing, Cloning, Dispensary Industry

352 Comments

J
Julie McAninch
5 years ago

Adamantly opposed. Please see email.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

I don't see the need for this to be so close to Oak Shores. We don't want it.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

No! We don't want pot farms across from Oak Shores!

L
Laurel Heinz
5 years ago

Oak Shores 378/102 & 378/101

R
Richard Williams
5 years ago

Oak Shores vacation home strongly opposed.

G
Gary R Stout
5 years ago

2457 Captains Walk Bradley, CA. 93426. 380/037

D
Delores Vicki Carr
5 years ago

I strongly disagree with the Negative Declaration and find it so alarming that our County Planning Department finds this Marijuana Plantation of NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON OAK SHORES AND ALL OF THE FAMILY RANCHES AND HOMES NEARBY WHO WILL HAVE TO DEAL WITH THE FALLOUT FROM THESE COMPANIES THAT CAUSE US SO MUCH GRIEF!!!!

C
Craig Stolz
5 years ago

I am vehemently apposed to this proposed use of the property located on Lynch Canyon by Greenmilk LLC for the purpose of cultivating and manufacturing cannabis and/ or cannabis products.

T
TRACI ROBINSON
5 years ago

Go somewhere else! We don't need that kind of business in our area, disturbing our wildlife, polluting our water sources, disturbing the quiet. STRONGLY OPPOSED!

C
Carol Anthony
5 years ago

Send them to Greenfield. The "Cannabis" industry has already ruined that town. Smelled it lately?

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Oak Shores Tract 379 Lot 27

M
Mark R Parsons
5 years ago

We strongly oppose! Besides the perspectives other have mentioned, I strongly believe this might contaminate our water supply that is already fragile enough!

S
Stephen Andreae
5 years ago

Track 378 Lot 74 We appose this installation for the following reasons and some not listed here: 1. Increase in traffic and accidents on Lynch Canyon and Inter-lake. 2. Loss of the privacy offered by rural environment. 3. Likely increase in crime and/or disturbances. 4. likely increase in trash and other clutter along roads. 5. Decrease in property values. 6. Negative impact on animal life in the area. 7. Increase in odors and pollution.

L
Lori Schneider
5 years ago

I already have to live with this same situation in Santa Barbara across the road from our property and I have NOTHING positive to say about these encroaching developments. The amount of water they use is enormous, the constant heavy skunk odor extremely unpleasant, the traffic and parking situation is problematic, as well as constant lookie loos checking it out. We are going to the lake to get away from these places, not to vacation or retire by them

M
Mark A Vock
5 years ago

Strongly oppose for the sake of our environment, health, property values, and overall safety. Oak Shores. Tract 379 Lot 168 and Tract 379 Lot 058

J
james and sandra rice
5 years ago

strongly oppossed

K
Karen Gellert
5 years ago

This is outrageous from many perspectives: environmental, health, to close to a small family oriented community, traffic, etc. This needs to be stopped.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

This has gone far enough, SLO County!!! How dare you do this to our communities!!

M
Michael Cann
5 years ago

Michael and Amy Cann Tract 381 Lot 229

M
Mike Bruno
5 years ago

I strongly oppose this use in our neighborhood.it will just bring more traffic and harm to our natural habitat.