Opposition to Lynch Canyon Greenmilk LLC Manufacturing, Processing, Testing, Cloning, Dispensary Industry
352 Comments
C
Constance Main
5 years ago
Against
B
Brian Lewis
5 years ago
no on cannabis
K
Kielle Horton
5 years ago
We strongly oppose the Lynch Canyon Cannabis facility!!
S
Sharyn Beagle
5 years ago
Oak Shores 379/014
Opposed. This will forever destroy the peaceful quality of life that we so cherish.
S
samuel d mckibbin
5 years ago
lousy location,too close to residental community
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
379-169
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
379-169
M
Mary Kateri Tobias
5 years ago
This project will damage our environment, our wildlife and pollute our water. Look at what has happened in other areas. Please do not allow this in our community.
M
Mark Rothschild
5 years ago
Cannabis production is not "agriculture" and does not belong anywhere near homes, schools or other residential uses. Is the County and State so hard up for money that they would degrade the quality of life of our communities for a few tax dollars? I oppose this project.
Address: 6850 Golden Pheasant Ln, Creston, CA 93432
D
Dale Richards
5 years ago
Cannabis does not belong in communities where people live. Please put residents quality of life above potential cannabis income. This is going to drive more tax payers out of the county & state.
G
GloryLynn Van Duren
5 years ago
NO CANNABIS WITHIN A MILE OF HOMES, SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, OR BUSINESSES.
J
Joan Esposito
5 years ago
Please do not let your wonderful country side become like Carpinteria. The canabis farms have destroyed Carpinteria and they will continue to grow all over SB county to the detriment of your community’s health.
T
Tanya Allred
5 years ago
Lot 21 Tract 381
M
Mateo valdes
5 years ago
I do not agree on putting a facility that will disturb our community and endanger the wild life
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
5220 Overhill lane
Templeton, ca 93465
M
Mary Anne Snyder
5 years ago
Whey does the county continue to permit large cannabis production in rural residential areas? Not a good fit.
C
Cindy Napoli
5 years ago
Totally opposed
M
Michele Lauffer
5 years ago
Tract 381 Lot 33
APN: 012-261-033
A
Anonymous
5 years ago
As homeowners of Oak Shores, this area is not well suited for this type of business and operation. We oppose this project.
Against
no on cannabis
We strongly oppose the Lynch Canyon Cannabis facility!!
Oak Shores 379/014 Opposed. This will forever destroy the peaceful quality of life that we so cherish.
lousy location,too close to residental community
379-169
379-169
This project will damage our environment, our wildlife and pollute our water. Look at what has happened in other areas. Please do not allow this in our community.
Cannabis production is not "agriculture" and does not belong anywhere near homes, schools or other residential uses. Is the County and State so hard up for money that they would degrade the quality of life of our communities for a few tax dollars? I oppose this project. Address: 6850 Golden Pheasant Ln, Creston, CA 93432
Cannabis does not belong in communities where people live. Please put residents quality of life above potential cannabis income. This is going to drive more tax payers out of the county & state.
NO CANNABIS WITHIN A MILE OF HOMES, SCHOOLS, CHURCHES, OR BUSINESSES.
Please do not let your wonderful country side become like Carpinteria. The canabis farms have destroyed Carpinteria and they will continue to grow all over SB county to the detriment of your community’s health.
Lot 21 Tract 381
I do not agree on putting a facility that will disturb our community and endanger the wild life
5220 Overhill lane Templeton, ca 93465
Whey does the county continue to permit large cannabis production in rural residential areas? Not a good fit.
Totally opposed
Tract 381 Lot 33 APN: 012-261-033
As homeowners of Oak Shores, this area is not well suited for this type of business and operation. We oppose this project.
379-053, 379-054