Opposition to 446 York ST Supervised Consumption Facility(SCF)
39 Comments
G
Gaye Weston
8 years ago
Featured
There is already the men’s mission across the street and adding this would change the nature of the neighbour and negatively affect local businesses
S
Sandra Rogers
8 years ago
The choice of location needs to be reconsidered. I believe that there needs to be more consultation and consideration about the school and business community surrounding the proposed site, not just the community of indiividuals it plans to serve.
P
Pam Alexander
8 years ago
Too close to Beal H. S. And the Men's Misson.
B
Brad Small
8 years ago
Poor choice of location for this service. This is far too close to schools and businesses.
D
david sanderson
8 years ago
The neighborhood has not been consulted and I agree with the concerns of the local businesses and residents
C
Christopher
8 years ago
Whoever thought it was a great idea to put one of these next to a high school needs their head examined!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Should be downtown near salvation army, or at salvation army.
M
Mary Lou Grealis
8 years ago
I totally agree and understand your concerns. Is there not any room at the Health Unit?
S
Shawn McBride
8 years ago
More money in education and healthcare not useless drug users
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
I o not agree with the concept of safe injection sites
P
Peter Beaumont
8 years ago
Featured
This proposed location isn't fair to the businesses in the area. We must also have consideration for these tax-paying business owners.
E
Eleanor Burnett
8 years ago
Site Sites are necessary however I feel this is not the correct location.
S
Steve Stacey
8 years ago
i'm in agreement with Safe Sites, but not at this location. Opposed for 444 York Street
T
Tom Jolliffe
8 years ago
I quite agree with the concept of Safe Injection Sites, however, I must disagree with the selected location at 446 York Street. Please find an alternate location.
M
Mary Parkin
8 years ago
I completely object!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Shouldn’t be near a high school.
C
Carol Brierley
8 years ago
I do not feel that this is the right location for such a site. Certainly is not taking in the public need and perception, being on such a public artery in London.
R
Rick Corin
8 years ago
Although I support the idea and intent, proximity to two high schools is a big problem for me to support the location proposed at 444 York st
C
Carolyn Linsdell
8 years ago
Just another example how Dr. Mackie appears to be in a rush to further his ambitions, rather then listen to the whole community.
444 York St. is not the right spot.
W
Walt Cherwaty
8 years ago
I see no criteria for such a decision . Donald Trump is alive and well in London .
There is already the men’s mission across the street and adding this would change the nature of the neighbour and negatively affect local businesses
The choice of location needs to be reconsidered. I believe that there needs to be more consultation and consideration about the school and business community surrounding the proposed site, not just the community of indiividuals it plans to serve.
Too close to Beal H. S. And the Men's Misson.
Poor choice of location for this service. This is far too close to schools and businesses.
The neighborhood has not been consulted and I agree with the concerns of the local businesses and residents
Whoever thought it was a great idea to put one of these next to a high school needs their head examined!
Should be downtown near salvation army, or at salvation army.
I totally agree and understand your concerns. Is there not any room at the Health Unit?
More money in education and healthcare not useless drug users
I o not agree with the concept of safe injection sites
This proposed location isn't fair to the businesses in the area. We must also have consideration for these tax-paying business owners.
Site Sites are necessary however I feel this is not the correct location.
i'm in agreement with Safe Sites, but not at this location. Opposed for 444 York Street
I quite agree with the concept of Safe Injection Sites, however, I must disagree with the selected location at 446 York Street. Please find an alternate location.
I completely object!
Shouldn’t be near a high school.
I do not feel that this is the right location for such a site. Certainly is not taking in the public need and perception, being on such a public artery in London.
Although I support the idea and intent, proximity to two high schools is a big problem for me to support the location proposed at 444 York st
Just another example how Dr. Mackie appears to be in a rush to further his ambitions, rather then listen to the whole community. 444 York St. is not the right spot.
I see no criteria for such a decision . Donald Trump is alive and well in London .