Skip to main content

Opposition to 446 York ST Supervised Consumption Facility(SCF)

39 Comments

G
Gaye Weston
8 years ago Featured

There is already the men’s mission across the street and adding this would change the nature of the neighbour and negatively affect local businesses

S
Sandra Rogers
8 years ago

The choice of location needs to be reconsidered. I believe that there needs to be more consultation and consideration about the school and business community surrounding the proposed site, not just the community of indiividuals it plans to serve.

P
Pam Alexander
8 years ago

Too close to Beal H. S. And the Men's Misson.

B
Brad Small
8 years ago

Poor choice of location for this service. This is far too close to schools and businesses.

D
david sanderson
8 years ago

The neighborhood has not been consulted and I agree with the concerns of the local businesses and residents

C
Christopher
8 years ago

Whoever thought it was a great idea to put one of these next to a high school needs their head examined!

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Should be downtown near salvation army, or at salvation army.

M
Mary Lou Grealis
8 years ago

I totally agree and understand your concerns. Is there not any room at the Health Unit?

S
Shawn McBride
8 years ago

More money in education and healthcare not useless drug users

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

I o not agree with the concept of safe injection sites

P
Peter Beaumont
8 years ago Featured

This proposed location isn't fair to the businesses in the area. We must also have consideration for these tax-paying business owners.

E
Eleanor Burnett
8 years ago

Site Sites are necessary however I feel this is not the correct location.

S
Steve Stacey
8 years ago

i'm in agreement with Safe Sites, but not at this location. Opposed for 444 York Street

T
Tom Jolliffe
8 years ago

I quite agree with the concept of Safe Injection Sites, however, I must disagree with the selected location at 446 York Street. Please find an alternate location.

M
Mary Parkin
8 years ago

I completely object!

A
Anonymous
8 years ago

Shouldn’t be near a high school.

C
Carol Brierley
8 years ago

I do not feel that this is the right location for such a site. Certainly is not taking in the public need and perception, being on such a public artery in London.

R
Rick Corin
8 years ago

Although I support the idea and intent, proximity to two high schools is a big problem for me to support the location proposed at 444 York st

C
Carolyn Linsdell
8 years ago

Just another example how Dr. Mackie appears to be in a rush to further his ambitions, rather then listen to the whole community. 444 York St. is not the right spot.

W
Walt Cherwaty
8 years ago

I see no criteria for such a decision . Donald Trump is alive and well in London .