Opposing the approval of Worcester cell tower

I oppose this cell tower which, in addition to being a violation of Worcester's ordinances, would ruin the only view of the entire Worcester Range from White Rock to Worcester Mountain, that Iknow of. There must be a better solution.

I rise in opposition to this cell tower proposal as a violation of the town ordinance

While I agree better cell service and/or wifi options in Worcester would benefit the community, I oppose this project given the proposed size and location of the tower, not to mention that it is in violation of Town Ordinance and Town Plan.

Surely there can be a better location for a cell tower. I keep singing "got along without you before I met you, gonna get along without you now." I feel the Town is being bullied by profiteers.

I object to the size and location of the tower. It is too close to homes, it would be an eyesore. It would destroy the beauty of the Ellis Bruce trail that is enjoyed by bikers and hikers.

Most Worcester residents support improved cell service and a tower but the Industrial Tower proposal contradicts the town's published tower ordinance and town plan on height and location. Worcester deserves better.

No, changing the rules when it's profitable and convenient is not acceptable practice. No

I would like cell service in Worcester, but I'm opposed to this proposal. The location is very visible and the view shed has never been provided showing who in town will actually benefit.

I oppose the cell tower project.

I appreciate the want for better cell coverage in our town. That said, there are other ways to provide better coverage that doesn't wreck the habitat being used, doesn't raise the question of the health safety of installations at this scale, and defile the beautiful landscape we all love. I look forward to being a part of more productive conversations going forward.

I oppose this tower for its location and height - but more importantly, for the way it is being forced on the residents of Worcester without showing any respect or consideration for our opinions and desires.

While I would appreciate good cell coverage, I am opposed to the location in light of the size and proximity to homes. Better options must be available, such as north of town where there are few to no homes and existing clearings because of logging.

This cell tower proposal is not supported by the Worcester Planning Commission.

I oppose this tower because it would be too tall, too close to a residence and too destructive to the view from the Ellis Bruce trail.

The size and location are what I object to. We can figure out something better!

We moved to Worcester for its scenic beauty and the limited EMF exposure from power lines and cellular lines. In our view this cell tower would reduce our property value.

I oppose this project. We need a comprehensive look at potential sites along the Route 12 corridor that can bring reliable service to as many people as possible. This analysis is entirely missing from the proposal.

While I'm in favor or good cell coverage, this proposal is not good for Worcester and the surrounding area. I strongly oppose it.

Please do not let this call tower go up in our small rural town.

I oppose the current cell tower location and size.