Oppose New Road Linking Rte 106 and Rte 27 near Whit's Corner
18 Comments
J
Jeanette Robischon
8 years ago
Strongly opposed to this road
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Featured
Grove Street is already the town drag strip. Adding to a congested and aggressively driven intersection is a bad design concept.
R
Roger Kernozicky
8 years ago
Cul de sac only
G
Gerry Buckley
8 years ago
I am opposed to this connector road and support making the development a cul-de-sac off Wapping Road.
R
Roger Kernozicky
8 years ago
Make it a cul-de-sac neighborhood off 106. Terrible intersection location on 27.
J
jeanette pasquale
8 years ago
Featured
Making this road a throughway with an entrance/exit just past Grove St creates an unnecessary added danger to drivers in that area. Best to keep it as a cul de sac with the entrance/exit on Wapping Road for the safety of all.
E
EILEEN LETSCHE FRASER
8 years ago
Featured
This is not a good idea to add a thruway roas from rt106 to rt27 Pembroke st. There is enough traffic from grove trying to turn either way on to Pembroke st and from Pembroke st on to grove.
Look at all the rear end accident that have happen there. And the #of cars that drive around the card trying to turn into Grove st. This is a VERY BAD IDEA.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Very dangerous.....with Grove St. so close, it's an accident waiting to happen.
D
David Buss
8 years ago
We do not need an increase in inherently bad traffic situations for the sake of profit. The town already has these types of problems with certain streets. We also don't need the increase of needing more services because of more developement.
B
Barbara Wright
8 years ago
I agree with the alternative solution to have it as a cul-de-sac with the entrance on Wapping Road.
P
Patrick V SCULLY
8 years ago
There should be a comprehensive traffic study done
E
Eileen Teuten
8 years ago
We do not need a thru way. Traffic is already bad on Rt. 27.
S
Sara Brooks
8 years ago
NO NO NO A THOUSAND TIMES NO
J
John cuddemi
8 years ago
Intersection is already dangerous. Adding additional traffic to this area would only increase the danger.
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
Featured
At least you have the light at 106/27 to help control the traffic. At times traffic is already backed up to Grove Street waiting for the light. Agree the real solution is keep keep the entrance on Wapping Road & keep the Wapping Estates as a cul-de-sac.
T
Todd sampson
8 years ago
I do not want a thru road there
S
Susan Foley
8 years ago
Featured
It is pretty tricky already navigating Grove St & Rt 27; especially the left hand turns there. I would love to see an alternate location used.
B
Bradford John Randall
8 years ago
Featured
This through road between 27 and 106 would be detrimental to the quality of life in Kingston. This proposed road would add pollution to the Jones River and would make an already dangerous intersection more dangerous at Grove St. and Route 27. Please, do not consider allowing this road to be built.
Strongly opposed to this road
Grove Street is already the town drag strip. Adding to a congested and aggressively driven intersection is a bad design concept.
Cul de sac only
I am opposed to this connector road and support making the development a cul-de-sac off Wapping Road.
Make it a cul-de-sac neighborhood off 106. Terrible intersection location on 27.
Making this road a throughway with an entrance/exit just past Grove St creates an unnecessary added danger to drivers in that area. Best to keep it as a cul de sac with the entrance/exit on Wapping Road for the safety of all.
This is not a good idea to add a thruway roas from rt106 to rt27 Pembroke st. There is enough traffic from grove trying to turn either way on to Pembroke st and from Pembroke st on to grove. Look at all the rear end accident that have happen there. And the #of cars that drive around the card trying to turn into Grove st. This is a VERY BAD IDEA.
Very dangerous.....with Grove St. so close, it's an accident waiting to happen.
We do not need an increase in inherently bad traffic situations for the sake of profit. The town already has these types of problems with certain streets. We also don't need the increase of needing more services because of more developement.
I agree with the alternative solution to have it as a cul-de-sac with the entrance on Wapping Road.
There should be a comprehensive traffic study done
We do not need a thru way. Traffic is already bad on Rt. 27.
NO NO NO A THOUSAND TIMES NO
Intersection is already dangerous. Adding additional traffic to this area would only increase the danger.
At least you have the light at 106/27 to help control the traffic. At times traffic is already backed up to Grove Street waiting for the light. Agree the real solution is keep keep the entrance on Wapping Road & keep the Wapping Estates as a cul-de-sac.
I do not want a thru road there
It is pretty tricky already navigating Grove St & Rt 27; especially the left hand turns there. I would love to see an alternate location used.
This through road between 27 and 106 would be detrimental to the quality of life in Kingston. This proposed road would add pollution to the Jones River and would make an already dangerous intersection more dangerous at Grove St. and Route 27. Please, do not consider allowing this road to be built.