Oppose LCDs and open up access to all MIGS options for glaucoma patients
160 Comments
S
stan thurley
2 years ago
This is an atrocity.
D
Debra Thompson
2 years ago
People need this surgery. Please support them
R
Robert Clark-Phelps
2 years ago
I have early stage glaucoma and want to have minimally invasive options available if some day my condition requires surgery.
R
Richard Berthelsdorf
2 years ago
Featured
MIGS is not only very effective for some, but makes a lot of sense economically. Not reimbursing for MIGS but reimbursing for much more invasive ophthalmologic surgery for the same reasons is akin to encouraging the use of sutures in place of band-aids.
A
AgBFijQTqd
2 years ago
sNtOPTXF
S
Sheila M Nathanson
2 years ago
Featured
I am not Medicare age yet but I can’t fathom why MIGS would not be covered. I recently had an istent placed and it has controlled by pressures. Everyone should be allowed this opportunity.
D
diana chao
2 years ago
my husband has glaucoma and enough medical problems. Eliminating MIGS options may mean more risky invasive surgeries. Please reconsider
M
Mary Bomba
2 years ago
Surgical options for glaucoma should be open to recipients of Medicare. Sometimes surgery is the best treatment option for the patient.
P
Preston Galbraith
2 years ago
This is a necessary surgery and should always be covered.
S
Sheila Hyatt
2 years ago
This really upsets me as the minimally invasive procedures can be as better option for some of us. Not all Glaucoma eyes are the same. They just don't care about us. If you have high blood pressure you get your medicine for free with insurance. Most of our drops are not free. They don't care if we are blind!
R
Reva Freedman
2 years ago
MIGS are a well-studied mainline treatment. If coverage is not available, doctors will lose the skills they need to do these operations and patients will be irretrievably harmed.
M
Maryina Clemens
2 years ago
People with glaucoma, will not be able to afford necessary treatment to save their vision, in the U.S., one of the wealthiest countries on earth. Do the right thing and cover by Medicare.
A
Anthony Elam
2 years ago
Eyesight is too important to be defunded
J
John Troche
2 years ago
I have severe glaucoma and have had the canaloplasty using iTrack. It was successful, lowering my IOP such that I have avoided more serious surgery. I need the same option for my other eye in the future. Simpler, no complications and only short term drugs/drops rather than months as with the more radical approaches.
E
Elaine Stanger
2 years ago
We need alk the help we can get but many cannot affird. It is cheaper in the long run to preserve our vision!
J
Jack Schultz
2 years ago
Glaucoma is a complex disease. We need all the treatment options we can get. That includes MIGS procedures.
A
Anonymous
2 years ago
Please do not limit treatment options for more than 3 million glaucoma patients in the US!
C
Christopher Spearman
2 years ago
Featured
As an eye surgeon myself, I cannot stress how incredibly important this is. If you ever need a glaucoma procedure, I pray that the best and most appropriate options are available to you.
P
Peter Ewing
2 years ago
N/A
T
Tammy Adam
2 years ago
This needs to be covered! Too important to those that are fighting to save their vision
This is an atrocity.
People need this surgery. Please support them
I have early stage glaucoma and want to have minimally invasive options available if some day my condition requires surgery.
MIGS is not only very effective for some, but makes a lot of sense economically. Not reimbursing for MIGS but reimbursing for much more invasive ophthalmologic surgery for the same reasons is akin to encouraging the use of sutures in place of band-aids.
sNtOPTXF
I am not Medicare age yet but I can’t fathom why MIGS would not be covered. I recently had an istent placed and it has controlled by pressures. Everyone should be allowed this opportunity.
my husband has glaucoma and enough medical problems. Eliminating MIGS options may mean more risky invasive surgeries. Please reconsider
Surgical options for glaucoma should be open to recipients of Medicare. Sometimes surgery is the best treatment option for the patient.
This is a necessary surgery and should always be covered.
This really upsets me as the minimally invasive procedures can be as better option for some of us. Not all Glaucoma eyes are the same. They just don't care about us. If you have high blood pressure you get your medicine for free with insurance. Most of our drops are not free. They don't care if we are blind!
MIGS are a well-studied mainline treatment. If coverage is not available, doctors will lose the skills they need to do these operations and patients will be irretrievably harmed.
People with glaucoma, will not be able to afford necessary treatment to save their vision, in the U.S., one of the wealthiest countries on earth. Do the right thing and cover by Medicare.
Eyesight is too important to be defunded
I have severe glaucoma and have had the canaloplasty using iTrack. It was successful, lowering my IOP such that I have avoided more serious surgery. I need the same option for my other eye in the future. Simpler, no complications and only short term drugs/drops rather than months as with the more radical approaches.
We need alk the help we can get but many cannot affird. It is cheaper in the long run to preserve our vision!
Glaucoma is a complex disease. We need all the treatment options we can get. That includes MIGS procedures.
Please do not limit treatment options for more than 3 million glaucoma patients in the US!
As an eye surgeon myself, I cannot stress how incredibly important this is. If you ever need a glaucoma procedure, I pray that the best and most appropriate options are available to you.
N/A
This needs to be covered! Too important to those that are fighting to save their vision