If there is nothing to hide, body cam's shouldn't be an issue
J
Jonah Horton
10 years ago
We need body cameras on these police officers so they know that everyone is watching them. They think that with no cameras they can't treat people any way they like. It's not right.
R
Randall mccain
10 years ago
We need the police department to resolve their issues I think the body camera program is good for the public well as the officers!!
M
Megan Rieff
10 years ago
How is even acceptable to suspend this program. It would protect both police officers and citizens!
V
Vanessa McGlothen
10 years ago
transparency and accountability is something that has been missing from the lowest to the highest levels of government. we the people, deserve what is right!
W
William Muschinske
10 years ago
Body cameras are important for the safety of the accuser and the accused.
R
Roderick Porter
10 years ago
These need to be on officers at ALL times!!
V
Vanessa Colbert
10 years ago
We want the cams.
J
James molledahl
10 years ago
Featured
As someone who has lived in Oklahoma and plans on moving back, I would feel safer with mandatory police cameras and they can be used to show officers sides of altercations and vindicate them of wrongdoing. There are no downsides.
D
Donald Ray James II
10 years ago
if they are not doing anything wrong, they have nothing to worry about.
C
Camille Hebert-Thomas
10 years ago
Functioning bodycam's should be welcomed while officer's are on duty to foster the same accountability & transparency now expected in interactions with the public, as well as CCTV use in public places. The issue of public access is the REAL crux of the argument more so than the possibility of minor intra-department infractions which may be a concern but falls far below the procedural concerns for safety. FOI requests have been & are the norm that may need adjustments to accommodate technology, however, the proposed application request & or court order from a completely subjunctive party (Judge) who work's daily & in close contact with lawyer's & police departments & would delay indefinitely as well as apply more financial investment on the part of the public. If transparency is truly the goal then procedures in place to fine tune access & viewing between FOP & Department's necessary but any further hinderances to public access of "public property, service's & oversight call to question the sincerity of law enforcement agencies & their true Functioning bodycam's should be welcomed while officer's are on duty to foster the same accountability & transparency now expected in interactions with the public, as well as CCTV use in public places. The issue of public access is the REAL crux of the argument more so than the possibility of minor intra-department infractions which may be a concern but falls far below the procedural concerns for safety. FOI requests have been & are the norm that may need adjustments to accommodate technology, however, the proposed application request & or court order from a completely subjunctive party (Judge) who work's daily & in close contact with lawyer's & police departments & would delay indefinitely as well as apply more financial investment on the part of the public. If transparency is truly the goal then procedures in place to fine tune access & viewing between FOP & Department's necessary but any further hinderances to public access o
L
Louise Burdine Parmer
10 years ago
Please give the officers back their body cams, they are greatly needed and appreciated, thank you for your time and consideration in this matter, because all lives matter.
C
Colyn Moss
10 years ago
With the right procedures in place, body cameras can be a win-win for the police officers and the communities they serve. That should be mandatory!
A
Anthony
10 years ago
Both parties need this to help insure the safety of humanity...
L
LaRita Hardimon
10 years ago
Stop killing us
S
STORMY CARBAJAL
10 years ago
This should become a mandatory element of reinforcing the entire "protect & serve" mantra.
Thank you.
Please! This will protect cops and civilians!
If there is nothing to hide, body cam's shouldn't be an issue
We need body cameras on these police officers so they know that everyone is watching them. They think that with no cameras they can't treat people any way they like. It's not right.
We need the police department to resolve their issues I think the body camera program is good for the public well as the officers!!
How is even acceptable to suspend this program. It would protect both police officers and citizens!
transparency and accountability is something that has been missing from the lowest to the highest levels of government. we the people, deserve what is right!
Body cameras are important for the safety of the accuser and the accused.
These need to be on officers at ALL times!!
We want the cams.
As someone who has lived in Oklahoma and plans on moving back, I would feel safer with mandatory police cameras and they can be used to show officers sides of altercations and vindicate them of wrongdoing. There are no downsides.
if they are not doing anything wrong, they have nothing to worry about.
Functioning bodycam's should be welcomed while officer's are on duty to foster the same accountability & transparency now expected in interactions with the public, as well as CCTV use in public places. The issue of public access is the REAL crux of the argument more so than the possibility of minor intra-department infractions which may be a concern but falls far below the procedural concerns for safety. FOI requests have been & are the norm that may need adjustments to accommodate technology, however, the proposed application request & or court order from a completely subjunctive party (Judge) who work's daily & in close contact with lawyer's & police departments & would delay indefinitely as well as apply more financial investment on the part of the public. If transparency is truly the goal then procedures in place to fine tune access & viewing between FOP & Department's necessary but any further hinderances to public access of "public property, service's & oversight call to question the sincerity of law enforcement agencies & their true Functioning bodycam's should be welcomed while officer's are on duty to foster the same accountability & transparency now expected in interactions with the public, as well as CCTV use in public places. The issue of public access is the REAL crux of the argument more so than the possibility of minor intra-department infractions which may be a concern but falls far below the procedural concerns for safety. FOI requests have been & are the norm that may need adjustments to accommodate technology, however, the proposed application request & or court order from a completely subjunctive party (Judge) who work's daily & in close contact with lawyer's & police departments & would delay indefinitely as well as apply more financial investment on the part of the public. If transparency is truly the goal then procedures in place to fine tune access & viewing between FOP & Department's necessary but any further hinderances to public access o
Please give the officers back their body cams, they are greatly needed and appreciated, thank you for your time and consideration in this matter, because all lives matter.
With the right procedures in place, body cameras can be a win-win for the police officers and the communities they serve. That should be mandatory!
Both parties need this to help insure the safety of humanity...
Stop killing us
This should become a mandatory element of reinforcing the entire "protect & serve" mantra.
Stop killing innocent people!
We need body cameras.