Strenuously object -- there is no justification for charging more when there is clearly huge waste and inefficiency within TWK.
D
Diane Armstrong
3 years ago
Strongly object
A
alistair armstrong
3 years ago
Strongly object
M
mark winter
3 years ago
gatvol of paying more for less
T
Tristan Hess
3 years ago
Living in a gravel road that's never maintained.
B
Beryl Wood
3 years ago
Unlawful due process has not been followed
P
Penny McRobert
3 years ago
Poor service delivery. Rates far too high .Strongly object
A
Adrian Janssen
3 years ago
We have no guarantee that the money will in fact be spent on infrastructure given TWKM's record of financial maladministration and failure to collect monies due
A
Alice DOBROVIC
3 years ago
Not acceptable. Rates are already too high.
A
Ann Palmer
3 years ago
We are paying plenty already for poor services. I strongly oppose this.
C
Chantelle smith
3 years ago
Property prices are dropping - my house valuation is way too high for the current market
D
Danny Shaw
3 years ago
Featured
TWK have increased my property in Fynbos Estate valuation by 200%!!! and refuse to reduce it. The service they are offering to provide at Fynbos is disgraceful. Now they want a levy as well??
L
Lisa Marais
3 years ago
Featured
TWK is not following due process as per council / municipal procedures. I oppose the introduction of this extra tariff and oppose approval thereof. As it inevitably will increase yearly, from (initially) a mere R20, it will put more and mere pressure on the poor, who already battle to survive.
S
Salome Kiewitz
3 years ago
We are paying so much already, just can not afford this.
A
Angela Craig
3 years ago
It's unethical to increase rates again when services to rate payers have visibly decreased.
A
Anonymous
3 years ago
Strongly oppose
J
Jenny Leuner
3 years ago
Are pensioners and think it is shocking news.
L
Liesel Naude
3 years ago
Strongly oppose this levy. Transparency of handling of TWK's finances is urgently required.
C
Catherine Palmer
3 years ago
Until the current administration can justify expenditure and clarify the requirement for more funds, I will not accept this additional charge.
I object to this proposed levy.
Strenuously object -- there is no justification for charging more when there is clearly huge waste and inefficiency within TWK.
Strongly object
Strongly object
gatvol of paying more for less
Living in a gravel road that's never maintained.
Unlawful due process has not been followed
Poor service delivery. Rates far too high .Strongly object
We have no guarantee that the money will in fact be spent on infrastructure given TWKM's record of financial maladministration and failure to collect monies due
Not acceptable. Rates are already too high.
We are paying plenty already for poor services. I strongly oppose this.
Property prices are dropping - my house valuation is way too high for the current market
TWK have increased my property in Fynbos Estate valuation by 200%!!! and refuse to reduce it. The service they are offering to provide at Fynbos is disgraceful. Now they want a levy as well??
TWK is not following due process as per council / municipal procedures. I oppose the introduction of this extra tariff and oppose approval thereof. As it inevitably will increase yearly, from (initially) a mere R20, it will put more and mere pressure on the poor, who already battle to survive.
We are paying so much already, just can not afford this.
It's unethical to increase rates again when services to rate payers have visibly decreased.
Strongly oppose
Are pensioners and think it is shocking news.
Strongly oppose this levy. Transparency of handling of TWK's finances is urgently required.
Until the current administration can justify expenditure and clarify the requirement for more funds, I will not accept this additional charge.