Objection to the Proposed Amendments to CARSs & CATS Part 55 & 56
65 Comments
G
gavin
9 years ago
Objection
Y
Yolande Combrinck
9 years ago
Object in strongest terms
A
AL Mocke
9 years ago
I object
T
Tony
9 years ago
Please stop the amendments to cars 55 &56
K
Kev storie
9 years ago
Featured
This needs to have wide discussion and has very large cost implications for the industry which is economically hard pressed at present.
R
Richard Smallman
9 years ago
I object to the proposed ammendments to CARS and CATS pt 55 and 56
R
R A Herber
9 years ago
Strongly object to recommendations to the Proposed Amendments to CARSs & CATS Part 55 & 56
A
Arthur Gemperle
9 years ago
Objections to the Proposed CAR & CATS, 55 & 56 (Schedule 6,7,24 & 25)
I
Ingmar Boesenberg
9 years ago
The introduction of these regulations requires full consultation with relevant interest groups.
G
Giel Odendaal
9 years ago
Very detrimental and shortsighted
C
Collin
9 years ago
Don't let it pass, things are complicated enough!
J
Jaco Steenkamp
9 years ago
This is, as usual, a money thing for someBODY and friends! Op hierdie stadium kan "klein outjies" soos ek, ook bekostig om te vlieg!!!
F
Francois Strydom
9 years ago
I object to these proposals
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
I am very concerned on the detrimental effect and far reaching implications these proposed new CARSs and CATS is going to have on the recreational industry
M
Melt Morrison
9 years ago
Featured
The proposed amendments do not seem to follow the spirit of NTCA. The NTCA owner needs technical oversight, not onerous regulation.
D
Denis Mavrokefalos
9 years ago
I fully suport transpearancy and consultaion with all parties concerned.
S
Steven O'Callaghan
9 years ago
I strongly object to these proposed changes
F
Frederick Stark
9 years ago
Leave our AP's alone. It works as it is!!
E
Eric Torr
9 years ago
We as members of SAGPA, need to take back our AP system. The present system is totally destroying our flying and we are fast running out of APs. RAASA must NOT have anything to do with our AP system at all and the current system of approving AP applictions is draconian to say the least. Look at the Australian model.
This whole thing should have been discussed at a AP seminar or at least a special meeting with all involved.
E
Eric Torr
9 years ago
Featured
We as members of SAGPA, need to take back our AP system. The present system is totally destroying our flying and we are fast running out of APs. RAASA must NOT have anything to do with our AP system at all and the current system of approving AP applictions is draconian to say the least. Look at the Australian model.
Objection
Object in strongest terms
I object
Please stop the amendments to cars 55 &56
This needs to have wide discussion and has very large cost implications for the industry which is economically hard pressed at present.
I object to the proposed ammendments to CARS and CATS pt 55 and 56
Strongly object to recommendations to the Proposed Amendments to CARSs & CATS Part 55 & 56
Objections to the Proposed CAR & CATS, 55 & 56 (Schedule 6,7,24 & 25)
The introduction of these regulations requires full consultation with relevant interest groups.
Very detrimental and shortsighted
Don't let it pass, things are complicated enough!
This is, as usual, a money thing for someBODY and friends! Op hierdie stadium kan "klein outjies" soos ek, ook bekostig om te vlieg!!!
I object to these proposals
I am very concerned on the detrimental effect and far reaching implications these proposed new CARSs and CATS is going to have on the recreational industry
The proposed amendments do not seem to follow the spirit of NTCA. The NTCA owner needs technical oversight, not onerous regulation.
I fully suport transpearancy and consultaion with all parties concerned.
I strongly object to these proposed changes
Leave our AP's alone. It works as it is!!
We as members of SAGPA, need to take back our AP system. The present system is totally destroying our flying and we are fast running out of APs. RAASA must NOT have anything to do with our AP system at all and the current system of approving AP applictions is draconian to say the least. Look at the Australian model. This whole thing should have been discussed at a AP seminar or at least a special meeting with all involved.
We as members of SAGPA, need to take back our AP system. The present system is totally destroying our flying and we are fast running out of APs. RAASA must NOT have anything to do with our AP system at all and the current system of approving AP applictions is draconian to say the least. Look at the Australian model.