I just visited at least seven countries of Africa with a caravan ,about 30 landings and take offs.Woulndnt have been possible,if..
So don't ruin tourism in Africa
C
Carmen Armstrong
9 years ago
This (unnecessary) over regulation will have a dire impact on GA in South Africa. I object to this change to PART 139.
M
Manuel Cordeiro
9 years ago
OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO PART 139 OF THE CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS, 2011 ("THE CARS")
K
Karen Kirsten
9 years ago
CAA, your proposed new regulation is ridiculous and nonsensical. Time new leadership is voted in.
N
Nik Lloyd-Roberts
9 years ago
I object to this change to PART 139.
T
Tristan McMillan
9 years ago
I object to this change to PART 139 as it will affect GA in RSA
F
Francois Badenhorst
9 years ago
It is such a short sighted move because 5 years from now there won't be any recreational revenue coming in at all. And our children will only see photographs of how it used to be. The rest of Africa is an excellent example!!
P
Peter Van Den bergh
9 years ago
Totally impractical - will kill the GA industry in SA
F
Francois Badenhorst
9 years ago
It is just another way to fill the state coffers. The government must stop making plans to try and fill the coffers but rather to plug the holes and eradicate theft and corruption
P
Pieter Briel
9 years ago
This proposed amendments to Part 139 will negatively impact on our recreational pilots and on so many jobs and current landing strips that most probably will have to close down!
P
Philip Theunissen
9 years ago
I strongly appose !
J
James Brodie
9 years ago
The proposed amendments to Part 139 will devastate general, recreational and commercial aviation in South Africa
H
Hans Lutz
9 years ago
This project will kill thousands of jobs around the country. It leads into the complete wrong direction: SA needs more jobs, not less!! Stop these plans immediately.
J
John Golding
9 years ago
A reminder for the CAA to support the aviation industry at all levels.
W
Walter Hill
9 years ago
I strongly appose!!
S
SP Fourie
9 years ago
Against new regulations
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
These proposals would be devastating to lodges, pilots, tourists, and the tourist industry at large! Please do not destroy a working system.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Accessibility will be limited to a much smaller number of airport or airstrips that will mean not flying directly to the destination but possibly further afield. This will cost time and yet more money pushing the cost of aviation higher for airfield owners, pilot, companies, organisations and all involved. Do not destroy aviation by bringing these amendments to part 135 into force.
D
Dave Harris
9 years ago
Just another scheme from the government to find another source of income for them to steal
Absurd
I just visited at least seven countries of Africa with a caravan ,about 30 landings and take offs.Woulndnt have been possible,if.. So don't ruin tourism in Africa
This (unnecessary) over regulation will have a dire impact on GA in South Africa. I object to this change to PART 139.
OBJECTION TO THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO PART 139 OF THE CIVIL AVIATION REGULATIONS, 2011 ("THE CARS")
CAA, your proposed new regulation is ridiculous and nonsensical. Time new leadership is voted in.
I object to this change to PART 139.
I object to this change to PART 139 as it will affect GA in RSA
It is such a short sighted move because 5 years from now there won't be any recreational revenue coming in at all. And our children will only see photographs of how it used to be. The rest of Africa is an excellent example!!
Totally impractical - will kill the GA industry in SA
It is just another way to fill the state coffers. The government must stop making plans to try and fill the coffers but rather to plug the holes and eradicate theft and corruption
This proposed amendments to Part 139 will negatively impact on our recreational pilots and on so many jobs and current landing strips that most probably will have to close down!
I strongly appose !
The proposed amendments to Part 139 will devastate general, recreational and commercial aviation in South Africa
This project will kill thousands of jobs around the country. It leads into the complete wrong direction: SA needs more jobs, not less!! Stop these plans immediately.
A reminder for the CAA to support the aviation industry at all levels.
I strongly appose!!
Against new regulations
These proposals would be devastating to lodges, pilots, tourists, and the tourist industry at large! Please do not destroy a working system.
Accessibility will be limited to a much smaller number of airport or airstrips that will mean not flying directly to the destination but possibly further afield. This will cost time and yet more money pushing the cost of aviation higher for airfield owners, pilot, companies, organisations and all involved. Do not destroy aviation by bringing these amendments to part 135 into force.
Just another scheme from the government to find another source of income for them to steal