NT must allow filming of "Lawrence: After Arabia" at Clouds Hill
42 Comments
C
Clare Morfey
7 years ago
The authenticity of this film is so important and I hope there will be a change of mind from those currently opposing filming within the grounds. Many many people in Dorset have adopted the extraordinary life and times of Lawrence to their hearts, not to mention the great man himself...the good and the bad of course.
His legacy deserves to live on and not be forgotten.
Please reconsider permitting access.
M
Mary C Sharp
7 years ago
We need Truth
J
John Bateman
7 years ago
Don't deny the British public the right to authenticity. He was a national hero.
R
Robert Longden
7 years ago
This is is a sincere and hard one project and it seems odd the National Trust has rejected the use of a property owned by us all. All publicity is good publicity and that is in itself a very good reason to reconsider the decision to exclude Mark and his storytellers.
L
Linda Martin
7 years ago
The use of national properties for the art of film are crucial. National Trust should allow the filming to go ahead out of respect for T. E.Lawrence.
C
Catherine Moon
7 years ago
Featured
Filming should be allowed and it may give much needed publicity and visitors to an important and unique house. It was said at a recent conference on T.E Lawrence that the house was in a worryingly poor state of repair.
P
Paul Kendall
7 years ago
It is important that the National Trust allow the film company to film at Clouds Hill for their forthcoming film, 'Lawrence after Arabia' to ensure authenticity. It would be a great shame if the National Trust do not provide access.
R
Robert Valent
7 years ago
I’m chairman of “The Lawrence of Arabia Society of Australia” and world needs to see Lawrence as he really was.
I am sure that you’ve seen “A Dangerous Man - Lawrence after Arabia” starring Ralph Fiennes.
It was authentic but had no use for Clouds Hill.
A nation so proud of it’s military achievements should show it’s heroes as authentic as can be achieved.
It would be blasphemy to use a studio location.
A
Alana Germain
7 years ago
Please allow the filming to go forward
J
Judith McDonald
7 years ago
Featured
I assume this is to be a serious and factual biographical account of TE after Arabia. As such I feel the NT should have no objection to CH being used. It was an integral part of his life post-war.
A
Ann Roodt
7 years ago
What is the harm in allowing filming in the garden. Also, there are far worse conspiracies that have no problem being filmed
D
David Sullivan
7 years ago
Featured
For me this action by the NT smacks of censorship, and the fact is that censorship always defeats its own purpose, for it creates, in the end, the kind of society that is incapable of exercising real discretion. Please reconsider this decision and allow permission for the filming to go forward.
T
tim cannock
7 years ago
This is part of 29th century heritage
M
Michael Hall
7 years ago
Come on NT, do the right thing and honour TEL.
M
Maddie Caffarel
7 years ago
Featured
Since I'm a student filmmaker myself as well as a Lawrence fan, I support the use of national properties for the arts, and want to see more films made about his life
J
John Alderton
7 years ago
Listen to the people NT
M
Mark Sillence
7 years ago
It’s not right, we should embrace potential historic stories and show off buildings. This should not have been stopped please reconsider
P
Paul Schaaf
7 years ago
Bizarre stance for NT to take on a topic that is most interesting, begs the question why?
S
Sandy Weatherburn
7 years ago
As a NT member I don’t see why this is a problem. The NT should reconsider this silly descision and feel honoured that someone does want to film at Clouds Hill!
D
Dawn Savery
7 years ago
I am saddened to hear that permission has been withdrawn. It would have been a good opportunity for both parties and to reawaken the publics interest in T.E.Lawrence. Films are educational as well as entertaining - without the original film, I possibly would not have hard of Lawrence of Arabia - it wasn't a topic taught at school. Even if you do not believe in the subject - you need to allow the nation to have that choice!
The authenticity of this film is so important and I hope there will be a change of mind from those currently opposing filming within the grounds. Many many people in Dorset have adopted the extraordinary life and times of Lawrence to their hearts, not to mention the great man himself...the good and the bad of course. His legacy deserves to live on and not be forgotten. Please reconsider permitting access.
We need Truth
Don't deny the British public the right to authenticity. He was a national hero.
This is is a sincere and hard one project and it seems odd the National Trust has rejected the use of a property owned by us all. All publicity is good publicity and that is in itself a very good reason to reconsider the decision to exclude Mark and his storytellers.
The use of national properties for the art of film are crucial. National Trust should allow the filming to go ahead out of respect for T. E.Lawrence.
Filming should be allowed and it may give much needed publicity and visitors to an important and unique house. It was said at a recent conference on T.E Lawrence that the house was in a worryingly poor state of repair.
It is important that the National Trust allow the film company to film at Clouds Hill for their forthcoming film, 'Lawrence after Arabia' to ensure authenticity. It would be a great shame if the National Trust do not provide access.
I’m chairman of “The Lawrence of Arabia Society of Australia” and world needs to see Lawrence as he really was. I am sure that you’ve seen “A Dangerous Man - Lawrence after Arabia” starring Ralph Fiennes. It was authentic but had no use for Clouds Hill. A nation so proud of it’s military achievements should show it’s heroes as authentic as can be achieved. It would be blasphemy to use a studio location.
Please allow the filming to go forward
I assume this is to be a serious and factual biographical account of TE after Arabia. As such I feel the NT should have no objection to CH being used. It was an integral part of his life post-war.
What is the harm in allowing filming in the garden. Also, there are far worse conspiracies that have no problem being filmed
For me this action by the NT smacks of censorship, and the fact is that censorship always defeats its own purpose, for it creates, in the end, the kind of society that is incapable of exercising real discretion. Please reconsider this decision and allow permission for the filming to go forward.
This is part of 29th century heritage
Come on NT, do the right thing and honour TEL.
Since I'm a student filmmaker myself as well as a Lawrence fan, I support the use of national properties for the arts, and want to see more films made about his life
Listen to the people NT
It’s not right, we should embrace potential historic stories and show off buildings. This should not have been stopped please reconsider
Bizarre stance for NT to take on a topic that is most interesting, begs the question why?
As a NT member I don’t see why this is a problem. The NT should reconsider this silly descision and feel honoured that someone does want to film at Clouds Hill!
I am saddened to hear that permission has been withdrawn. It would have been a good opportunity for both parties and to reawaken the publics interest in T.E.Lawrence. Films are educational as well as entertaining - without the original film, I possibly would not have hard of Lawrence of Arabia - it wasn't a topic taught at school. Even if you do not believe in the subject - you need to allow the nation to have that choice!