Skip to main content

No to UNP TIF Arena in Norman

219 Comments

M
Michael Slack
8 years ago

No on the Arena TIF!

A
Anna AF
8 years ago

Local merchants will suffer because of corporate investments (Goldman Sachs and Pacific Life?) that are tax payer funded to the tune of $100 million. At this point I think I'd be for paying the $100 million to make sure it DOES NOT HAPPEN. That would be a more reasonable investment to make sure local people still have a stake in our town.

M
Michael Oxley
8 years ago

Just say No to the Arena. It's not good for Norman nor the locally owned business's it will close down. We dont want a corporate town of Norman. Keep it local!

M
Marianne Allbritton
8 years ago

NO ARENA WITHOUT AN ANALYSIS.& VOTE OF THE PEOPLE!

S
Susan M Smith
8 years ago

Let OU pay for this arena if they want it, not the citizens. We’ve already seen what the UNP TIF has done to Ed Noble Parkway.

A
Aisha Ali
8 years ago

Work with citizens to gain support and create a plan that reduces clear economic hardships on other districts/businesses while increases valid revenue streams (not projected but proven vetted practices). Focus on fulfilling budget gaps and promised developments FIRST (senior center, storm water utility and sports complex FOR ALL AGES)

S
Sue Velie
8 years ago

Should not use taxpayer's money without their vote. Use private sources.

J
Jean Petroff
8 years ago

I envision UNP will look a lot like the Ed Noble Parkway in 10 to 15 years.

M
Martha Sickles Henderson
8 years ago

So disappointed that people I admire are supporting this issue.

M
Merrilee Ishii
8 years ago

With the severe deficit in education funding, this seems to be a misuse of the taxpayers’ dollars.

C
Cynthia Rogers
8 years ago Featured

As an economist who studies these types of deals, this proposal raises many concerns about it fiscal prudence (it is not likely to pay off at pennies on the sales tax dollar that accrue to the general fund. It also transfers tax dollars to privately owned assets - a no no for government policy.

A
Annie Terrill
8 years ago

Please deny it.

N
Nancy Smart
8 years ago

I oppose this wasteful use of tax money. The UNP TIF is detrimental to Norman.

V
Van harrington
8 years ago

NO to This TIF

M
Mike Ross
8 years ago

It’s a No vote for me.

J
Jamie Lopez
8 years ago

I am opposed to tax payers footing a $100M bill for an arena we won’t own and without a vote of the people.

J
John McGraw
8 years ago

Eng the TiF, balance the budget.

J
Jeffrey A Davault
8 years ago

Don't Edmond my Norman!

K
Kalynn Scott
8 years ago

Continuing the UNP TIF is financially irresponsible and should not be considered by council as a viable option for Norman's future. The implications of continuing this corporate subsidy will not benefit the future generations of Normanites. The City of Norman needs to use its current standing among the surrounding cities in Oklahoma and lead by example. Use the money that would be added to the cities budget by ending the TIF and improve the quality of life for all of Norman. Our infrastructure, schools, and stormwater issues need to be funded before we put all of our eggs in the UNP basket.

M
Marc Eubanks
8 years ago

Not with my tax dollars. Don't ruin our town. We didn't want the first UNP and we sure don't need a second. They prmosied us Nordstroms and Anthrolopolgie and high end shopping. We got Target and Dressbarn, and the slow death of Ed Noble. Now they promise an arena and fine dining. Fool me once - shame on you. Fool me twice - shame on me. There will not be a second time. You have lost the confidence of Norman residents!