A bad idea. Why wasn’t this proposal fully studied and presented before starting?
P
Patricia
8 years ago
I said No
P
Peggy Pappas
8 years ago
The city just finished the walks, curb and gutters, and road surfacing on NW 24th Street. The tif proposes widening NW 24th to six lanes. This seems a waste of city money to tear out and rebuild. In addition, it calls for construction on I35 and Tecumseh which would again cause problems with traffic coming to Norman. After all we have gone through with I35 construction, any new construction is certainly unwanted. Let the community heal from the last few years.
S
Susan Whiteneck
8 years ago
Let the people who’ll be paying for this vote.
B
BJ Dow
8 years ago
Agree with stated reasons for opposition. Additionally, why the secrecy? Who are developers and investors?
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
No, please research this issue, it should be an obvious no.
E
Ellen Wisdom
8 years ago
I can't imagine why the city of Norman should spend money to help OU build its arena. Nor should we expand the current UNP for all the reasons stated in the petition. The city budget is not yet balanced for the coming year and voters expect the city to follow through on commitments made to Norman Forward. We also need to address storm water issues. NO to UNP expansion!! We should end the current UNP now and balance the budget.
R
Rebecca Clinton
8 years ago
NO new arena for Norman. Please vote NO.
C
Carlie D'Alessandro
8 years ago
I cannot support this pushy backdoor deal that will not benefit my city.
J
John Banas
8 years ago
This is a terrible idea that is evident if you understand economics
K
Karyl Shaw
8 years ago
The UNP TIF Arena proposal is not a positive for Norman.
I
Isabella R Clement
8 years ago
Yeet!
B
Bethany Clay
8 years ago
Norman needs to take care of what we already have.
D
David Fielding
8 years ago
Arena fine, but not on tax payer's dollar, Richie Rich..
J
Joel regalado
8 years ago
No!
A
Anonymous
8 years ago
No to UNP
S
Sophia Morren
8 years ago
Balance the budget, end the TIF.
R
Ralph Ward
8 years ago
DB is gone. Don’t need more empty buildings and excessive overheads.
A bad idea. Why wasn’t this proposal fully studied and presented before starting?
I said No
The city just finished the walks, curb and gutters, and road surfacing on NW 24th Street. The tif proposes widening NW 24th to six lanes. This seems a waste of city money to tear out and rebuild. In addition, it calls for construction on I35 and Tecumseh which would again cause problems with traffic coming to Norman. After all we have gone through with I35 construction, any new construction is certainly unwanted. Let the community heal from the last few years.
Let the people who’ll be paying for this vote.
Agree with stated reasons for opposition. Additionally, why the secrecy? Who are developers and investors?
No, please research this issue, it should be an obvious no.
I can't imagine why the city of Norman should spend money to help OU build its arena. Nor should we expand the current UNP for all the reasons stated in the petition. The city budget is not yet balanced for the coming year and voters expect the city to follow through on commitments made to Norman Forward. We also need to address storm water issues. NO to UNP expansion!! We should end the current UNP now and balance the budget.
NO new arena for Norman. Please vote NO.
I cannot support this pushy backdoor deal that will not benefit my city.
This is a terrible idea that is evident if you understand economics
The UNP TIF Arena proposal is not a positive for Norman.
Yeet!
Norman needs to take care of what we already have.
Arena fine, but not on tax payer's dollar, Richie Rich..
No!
No to UNP
Balance the budget, end the TIF.
DB is gone. Don’t need more empty buildings and excessive overheads.
This is a horrible idea. No, no, no!
Against tif