We bought on our street to have land and not houses up against us.
R
Ryan Lolly
7 years ago
Featured
There's an example of this off of 951, I believe it's at the end of 5th Ave SW. It's not good. The estates are larger land parcels for a reason. If someone wants to put 44 homes on 17.5 acres, purchase property that's zoned for that. Don't take away our rights.
K
Keri McDonnell
7 years ago
Don’t change the zoning of Logan Woods or the Estates as we moved here to not be that close to the next home or traffic
K
Karen Maris
7 years ago
People bought in this neighborhood and want to live there because of it’s current character and it is wrong to allow development that is contrary to that. There is enough development in Naples already. Greed and overdevelopment will ruin Naples for the people who have chosen to live here.
G
Gary Grosser
7 years ago
No
S
Shirley Ruder
7 years ago
No
C
Carlos sena
7 years ago
No , NO to change of Golden Gate Estates Land Use!
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
cramming 44 homes on a 17.5 acre parcel is simply unacceptable.
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
This is not want Logan Woods is about! We bought acreage for a reason!
A
Adel
7 years ago
No change
F
Fred
7 years ago
No change
V
Vincent and Dorothy DOrazio
7 years ago
Featured
We oppose changes to the existing zoning requirements for the properties of Logan Woods! We feel such a change to the density of subdivided lands would add to the burden of environmental damage, traffic logistics and overall quality of life for residents and wildlife! Stop the madness of unrestricted growth!
A
Anonymous
7 years ago
Ditto on ALL of the aboeve comments Hopefully they will be heard ! It has to stop at the grassroots !
E
Emily Siwek
7 years ago
Do not change the zoning law for Logan Woods.
S
Sabrina Hamilton
7 years ago
Not needed. Not wanted!!
N
Nancy Ferguson
7 years ago
It would be a disgrace to destroy the integrity of this community.
B
Barbara chille
7 years ago
The rules are there for a reason. They should stand. We don't need all the extra traffic also
E
Emilia Montalto
7 years ago
PO Box 25
C
Christina Stevens
7 years ago
Featured
This is an attempt to profit at the expense of an established community. The rules governing subdividing are clear and must stand. To more than double the number of existing homes in the community at the whim of one owner would be reprehensible.
We bought on our street to have land and not houses up against us.
There's an example of this off of 951, I believe it's at the end of 5th Ave SW. It's not good. The estates are larger land parcels for a reason. If someone wants to put 44 homes on 17.5 acres, purchase property that's zoned for that. Don't take away our rights.
Don’t change the zoning of Logan Woods or the Estates as we moved here to not be that close to the next home or traffic
People bought in this neighborhood and want to live there because of it’s current character and it is wrong to allow development that is contrary to that. There is enough development in Naples already. Greed and overdevelopment will ruin Naples for the people who have chosen to live here.
No
No
No , NO to change of Golden Gate Estates Land Use!
cramming 44 homes on a 17.5 acre parcel is simply unacceptable.
This is not want Logan Woods is about! We bought acreage for a reason!
No change
No change
We oppose changes to the existing zoning requirements for the properties of Logan Woods! We feel such a change to the density of subdivided lands would add to the burden of environmental damage, traffic logistics and overall quality of life for residents and wildlife! Stop the madness of unrestricted growth!
Ditto on ALL of the aboeve comments Hopefully they will be heard ! It has to stop at the grassroots !
Do not change the zoning law for Logan Woods.
Not needed. Not wanted!!
It would be a disgrace to destroy the integrity of this community.
The rules are there for a reason. They should stand. We don't need all the extra traffic also
PO Box 25
This is an attempt to profit at the expense of an established community. The rules governing subdividing are clear and must stand. To more than double the number of existing homes in the community at the whim of one owner would be reprehensible.
6270 Sea Grass Lane