My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
M
Miranda Corben
12 years ago
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Looks like the government is starting to go back on its 2010 pledge that there would be no third runway at Heathrow. This is a major let-down for us residents and for the environment.
M
Margaret Holmes
12 years ago
No-one who lives under the flightpath could claim the newer planes are quiet!
J
Jeremy Payne
12 years ago
Dumb and short-sighted.
P
Paul Phillips
12 years ago
I would seriously have to consider moving house and leaving Barnes after 7 years if another runway is added
A
Alastair Pettigrew
12 years ago
Stop this blind madness
A
Annette Forbes
12 years ago
We should not increase the risk of disaster by increasing the number of flight approaching Heathrow straight over one of the biggest capital cities.
E
Emily Morgan
12 years ago
I am strongly opposed to any expansion of Heathrow airport that will affect the noise pollution in West London - We live in Barnes and are already hugely affected by the noise pollution and to have this increased would be detrimental to our everyday lives. Many thanks for listening.
no more
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
My main objection is on grounds of safety. It seems quite mad to have yet more aircraft landing over such a built up area,, not matter what the statistics say about air travel. Accidents can and do happen (not mention deliberate trrorist attacks
Looks like the government is starting to go back on its 2010 pledge that there would be no third runway at Heathrow. This is a major let-down for us residents and for the environment.
No-one who lives under the flightpath could claim the newer planes are quiet!
Dumb and short-sighted.
I would seriously have to consider moving house and leaving Barnes after 7 years if another runway is added
Stop this blind madness
We should not increase the risk of disaster by increasing the number of flight approaching Heathrow straight over one of the biggest capital cities.
I am strongly opposed to any expansion of Heathrow airport that will affect the noise pollution in West London - We live in Barnes and are already hugely affected by the noise pollution and to have this increased would be detrimental to our everyday lives. Many thanks for listening.