The challenge of Global Warming is widely acknowledged, and we are committed to reducing our emissions. There is no case for airport expansion as we need to be reducing emissions. However, Heathrow is in the wrong place for a major airport, the local noise and air pollution is horrendous and inappropriate for an inland, built up area. Expansion would make this even worse. need
R
Rebecca Khaksar
12 years ago
I use planes and I use cars. I specifically bought a house away from motorways and flight paths. I strongly object to the change in flight paths and expansion of Heathrow airport.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
There has been a significant increase in noise from low flying planes at all hours
C
Claire Bradbury
12 years ago
I bought this house so that my autistic son was not in the flight path. Please stop these trials immediately.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Noise over Bracknell is intolerable
N
Naomi brown
12 years ago
Not happy
H
Helen Ward
12 years ago
the flight trials have brought constant noise over my neighbourhood, all day, late at night and early mornings. I have been forced to close windows and doors to watch television. The intrusion has been shocking. If a 3rd runway will make this misery for ever, I don't want it. It's a shame, because I'm all for expansion, but not at the expense of our home life
C
Christabelle Menezes-Sachdev
12 years ago
enough traffic at Heathrow best you expand another airport
M
murray barter
12 years ago
NO 3rd RUNWAY!! Unless you're currently underneath a flightpath, it will be difficult to understand how bad tge impact is. Do not trust the Heathrow propaganda and PR machine on public support
J
Jenny Kniese
12 years ago
No way. It's too big already. Develop regional airports and a better connecting infrastructure
A
Amber Glossop
12 years ago
NO!!! Enough noise and pollution already!!
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Keep Heathrow as it has always been, especially to continue to serve all the businesses in the Thames Valley, and provide better access to London from other satellite airports, also benefitting the areas around those airports and attracting more businesses to them too.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Keep Heathrow as it has always been, especially to continue to serve all the businesses in the Thames Valley, and provide better access to London from other satellite airports, also benefitting the areas around those airports and attracting more businesses to them too.
S
Simon Mann
12 years ago
A third runway is NOT needed.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
A DEFINITE NO - we don't need it.
C
Christine Smith
12 years ago
I live in a neighbourhood usually so quiet that the noise of the passing train can be heard over a mile away. Heathrow's trial shatters the calm of a rural area & destroys quality of life
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
We have had enough of the air pollution and noise.
T
Tim Marr
12 years ago
Noise from Heathrow has recently got much worse around Ascot and Windlesham and is destroying peoples' quality of life. There must be no further runways at Heathrow.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
no to Heathrow expansion
M
Mrs Tracey Skinner
12 years ago
Too noisy as it is already. Expansion will incur night flights, which are unacceptable.
The challenge of Global Warming is widely acknowledged, and we are committed to reducing our emissions. There is no case for airport expansion as we need to be reducing emissions. However, Heathrow is in the wrong place for a major airport, the local noise and air pollution is horrendous and inappropriate for an inland, built up area. Expansion would make this even worse. need
I use planes and I use cars. I specifically bought a house away from motorways and flight paths. I strongly object to the change in flight paths and expansion of Heathrow airport.
There has been a significant increase in noise from low flying planes at all hours
I bought this house so that my autistic son was not in the flight path. Please stop these trials immediately.
Noise over Bracknell is intolerable
Not happy
the flight trials have brought constant noise over my neighbourhood, all day, late at night and early mornings. I have been forced to close windows and doors to watch television. The intrusion has been shocking. If a 3rd runway will make this misery for ever, I don't want it. It's a shame, because I'm all for expansion, but not at the expense of our home life
enough traffic at Heathrow best you expand another airport
NO 3rd RUNWAY!! Unless you're currently underneath a flightpath, it will be difficult to understand how bad tge impact is. Do not trust the Heathrow propaganda and PR machine on public support
No way. It's too big already. Develop regional airports and a better connecting infrastructure
NO!!! Enough noise and pollution already!!
Keep Heathrow as it has always been, especially to continue to serve all the businesses in the Thames Valley, and provide better access to London from other satellite airports, also benefitting the areas around those airports and attracting more businesses to them too.
Keep Heathrow as it has always been, especially to continue to serve all the businesses in the Thames Valley, and provide better access to London from other satellite airports, also benefitting the areas around those airports and attracting more businesses to them too.
A third runway is NOT needed.
A DEFINITE NO - we don't need it.
I live in a neighbourhood usually so quiet that the noise of the passing train can be heard over a mile away. Heathrow's trial shatters the calm of a rural area & destroys quality of life
We have had enough of the air pollution and noise.
Noise from Heathrow has recently got much worse around Ascot and Windlesham and is destroying peoples' quality of life. There must be no further runways at Heathrow.
no to Heathrow expansion
Too noisy as it is already. Expansion will incur night flights, which are unacceptable.