My family lived under the flight path for years it was bad enough then, this would be a disaster
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Demolishing an English village that dates back to the Doom day?!?
A
Amelia
11 years ago
Expand other Airports or use those with lots of space readily available i.e. Kent or Norwich
K
K. Cotter
11 years ago
Any promise made re noise WILL be broken.
T
trish ward
11 years ago
to make people lose their homes and businesses is a disgrace
M
moya white
11 years ago
should be in the estuary
A
Alexandra Dzhuras
11 years ago
This expansion is only benefiting airlines. Even if UK needs more flights capacity - why we should offer our health and safety in exchange to 'stopover' long haul flights? How this stopover passengers will contribute to broader economy above and beyond air and noise pollution and lining up airlines pockes with profit?
C
Christine Antrobus
11 years ago
a new airport IS required but in the Thames Estuary. It is obscene to demolish people's homes to put a new runway at Heathrow. That airport cannot cope with the traffic going to the airport or the people tuning the airport. It's a mess. Open a completely new one elsewhere and do it properly, like Schhol or Singapore. Heathrow should scrapped not expanded.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Abosltuely none of the promises being made, such as keeping to reccomended noise and enviromental and limits will be honoered, including banning night flights. They are already consistely and unapologetically broken.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
utter short sighted madness, let's have a proper plan for the coming century of air travel.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
No T5, No night flights, quieter planes, heard it all before. Gatwick Wants a second runway and infrascructure not that shabby
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Opposed to a third runway on environmental grounds
T
TOM HANSON
11 years ago
NO TO EXPANSION.
M
matt singh
11 years ago
Why concentrate the majority of aircraft traffic into West London. A spread of air traffic load across Greater London and outside London would be beneficial to local economy in those areas.
K
kay jeetan
11 years ago
First it was terminal 4 and then terminal 5. When will the expansion stop? Until it reaches out to the M25? Focusing all the aircraft noise and traffic into one area is not a healthy long term strategic solution. We must plan and act now to have a country wide solution for future air travel which benefits all. Having more planes directed towards west london will increase the already hellish pollution, noise and road congestion. It will only get worse if a third runway goes ahead and then terminal 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 will follow I'm sure.
GLOBAL WARMING
My family lived under the flight path for years it was bad enough then, this would be a disaster
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
Huge concern re noise, pollution and greenbelt
Demolishing an English village that dates back to the Doom day?!?
Expand other Airports or use those with lots of space readily available i.e. Kent or Norwich
Any promise made re noise WILL be broken.
to make people lose their homes and businesses is a disgrace
should be in the estuary
This expansion is only benefiting airlines. Even if UK needs more flights capacity - why we should offer our health and safety in exchange to 'stopover' long haul flights? How this stopover passengers will contribute to broader economy above and beyond air and noise pollution and lining up airlines pockes with profit?
a new airport IS required but in the Thames Estuary. It is obscene to demolish people's homes to put a new runway at Heathrow. That airport cannot cope with the traffic going to the airport or the people tuning the airport. It's a mess. Open a completely new one elsewhere and do it properly, like Schhol or Singapore. Heathrow should scrapped not expanded.
Abosltuely none of the promises being made, such as keeping to reccomended noise and enviromental and limits will be honoered, including banning night flights. They are already consistely and unapologetically broken.
utter short sighted madness, let's have a proper plan for the coming century of air travel.
No T5, No night flights, quieter planes, heard it all before. Gatwick Wants a second runway and infrascructure not that shabby
Opposed to a third runway on environmental grounds
NO TO EXPANSION.
Why concentrate the majority of aircraft traffic into West London. A spread of air traffic load across Greater London and outside London would be beneficial to local economy in those areas.
First it was terminal 4 and then terminal 5. When will the expansion stop? Until it reaches out to the M25? Focusing all the aircraft noise and traffic into one area is not a healthy long term strategic solution. We must plan and act now to have a country wide solution for future air travel which benefits all. Having more planes directed towards west london will increase the already hellish pollution, noise and road congestion. It will only get worse if a third runway goes ahead and then terminal 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10 will follow I'm sure.