It's about time that the local people were listened to.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
No third runway. Sleep deprived as it is.
F
Fiona King
11 years ago
I am against this expansin d
B
Brian Clarke
11 years ago
a third runway would have awful consequences for my family. Nor is it necessary.
C
Carla Field
11 years ago
It would be intolerable not just for the noise but also for the pollution
B
blanc
11 years ago
WE ARE DESTROYING THIS BEAUTIFUL CITY THEY ARE BUILDING EVERYWEHRE VERY UGLY BUILDING IN 5YEARS LONDON WILL LOOK NOTHING AT ALL THIS IS NO GOOD FOR THE ATHMOSPHERE THE WILDLIFE ENGLAND IS A SMALL ISLAND IT IS NO RIGHT TO HAVE SO MANY PEOPLE ON IT.
D
Denise Bridgman
11 years ago
NO MORE NOISE
S
Simon Penniston
11 years ago
I live in Ealing and when there is an easterly wind, we get aircraft after aircraft roaring overhead
R
richard jones
11 years ago
No Heathrow expansion is what over a million Londoners demand. They want to maintain their sanity, health and quality of life. That fool Davis had only money on his mind I wander how many back handers he got? How would he like planes taking off from Heathrow screaming over his roof top at well below 1500 feet with engines on full throttle?
Richard Jones, Hanworth, Hounslow, TW13 5JB
S
Sue Atkins
11 years ago
I strongly oppose an expansion to Heathrow. The noise levels are already too high.
R
richard jones
11 years ago
Heathrow must not be allowed to expand
K
K. Cotter
11 years ago
Absolutly no 3rd runway
K
Kim
11 years ago
Homes we need , runways we do not.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
We already experience disrputive noise from Heathrow at weekends when the flight paths are diverted over Hanwell - with the very real possibility this noise will be constant with a 3rd runaway is just intolerable.
D
dave healey
11 years ago
who said no ifs no buts
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Noise from Heathrow airport affects more residents than any other airport in Europe, by an enormous margin. Indeed nearly a third of all people in Europe negatively affected by aircraft noise live under the Heathrow flightpath. An extra runway would simply be intolerable.2nd runway at Gatwick best option and they want one.
G
Gustav Coleske
11 years ago
The so-called "temporary" flight path over the Ascot area that now became the permanent flight path and flights sometimes past 23:30 is unacceptable. Now NATS are saying that they don't plan to change the "temporary" flight patterns back. See their reply when asked to revert back to the old patterns: http://www.heathrow.com/noise/heathrow-operations/latest-news/march-2015-_-compton. Imagine what they will be saying about complaints from noise made by traffic from a third runway. No planning permission or consultation required.
J
John Stowell
11 years ago
Aircraft noise already unacceptable in Binfield which now appears to be an integral part of Heathrow Airport!!
Live where we live then you will also say no
lets think of the future inste
It's about time that the local people were listened to.
No third runway. Sleep deprived as it is.
I am against this expansin d
a third runway would have awful consequences for my family. Nor is it necessary.
It would be intolerable not just for the noise but also for the pollution
WE ARE DESTROYING THIS BEAUTIFUL CITY THEY ARE BUILDING EVERYWEHRE VERY UGLY BUILDING IN 5YEARS LONDON WILL LOOK NOTHING AT ALL THIS IS NO GOOD FOR THE ATHMOSPHERE THE WILDLIFE ENGLAND IS A SMALL ISLAND IT IS NO RIGHT TO HAVE SO MANY PEOPLE ON IT.
NO MORE NOISE
I live in Ealing and when there is an easterly wind, we get aircraft after aircraft roaring overhead
No Heathrow expansion is what over a million Londoners demand. They want to maintain their sanity, health and quality of life. That fool Davis had only money on his mind I wander how many back handers he got? How would he like planes taking off from Heathrow screaming over his roof top at well below 1500 feet with engines on full throttle? Richard Jones, Hanworth, Hounslow, TW13 5JB
I strongly oppose an expansion to Heathrow. The noise levels are already too high.
Heathrow must not be allowed to expand
Absolutly no 3rd runway
Homes we need , runways we do not.
We already experience disrputive noise from Heathrow at weekends when the flight paths are diverted over Hanwell - with the very real possibility this noise will be constant with a 3rd runaway is just intolerable.
who said no ifs no buts
Noise from Heathrow airport affects more residents than any other airport in Europe, by an enormous margin. Indeed nearly a third of all people in Europe negatively affected by aircraft noise live under the Heathrow flightpath. An extra runway would simply be intolerable.2nd runway at Gatwick best option and they want one.
The so-called "temporary" flight path over the Ascot area that now became the permanent flight path and flights sometimes past 23:30 is unacceptable. Now NATS are saying that they don't plan to change the "temporary" flight patterns back. See their reply when asked to revert back to the old patterns: http://www.heathrow.com/noise/heathrow-operations/latest-news/march-2015-_-compton. Imagine what they will be saying about complaints from noise made by traffic from a third runway. No planning permission or consultation required.
Aircraft noise already unacceptable in Binfield which now appears to be an integral part of Heathrow Airport!!