I am under the pathway at work and cannot continue with 'phone calls when an aircraft goes over.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Pollutin, noise, congestion, increased danger of accidents: no thanks!
B
bradshaw
11 years ago
please send details of the rally
P
Peter Wilkinson
11 years ago
The impact upon the highly populated suburbs of West London of a third runway at Heathrow is totally unacceptable, in terms both of noise and of air pollution. Expansion at Gatwick would be a less damaging option. Better still would be no airport expansion at all; increased air travel is unnecessary and damaging at a time when the urgent need is to reduce our carbon emissions.
A
Andy Lane
11 years ago
Under NO circumstances should LHR be expanded! Gatwick is better suited but the best option is a completely new airport away from all residential development. It's about time people were put before the profits of business!
P
paul jackson
11 years ago
no3rd runway.the benefits have been exagerrated
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
.
A
Allan Machon
11 years ago
no
D
Dr Lourdes Rico
11 years ago
The pollution to our lungs is very heavy already plus more nocive fumes to our health such as noice and traffic congestion
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
It is just unnaceptable
M
Mr Derek and Mrs Joan Nash
11 years ago
polution ,crowded roads, noise,
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
Not cost effective or of other significant benefit.
M
Mrs C G Woods
11 years ago
I am totally against, plans to build a 3rd runway, more pollution & unacceptable noise levels, no thanks
A
alastair
11 years ago
Heathrow is slap bang in the middle of a highly populated area with thousands of people underneath 3rd runway would result in monstrous noise levels
A
anjula sharma
11 years ago
I am totally against, plans to build a 3rd runway, more pollution, more homes lost, we was promised by the out prime minister, this would not happen, if he got elected, he cannot go back on his word?
M
michael Tuohy
11 years ago
The approach roads are barely capable of handling the traffic from London so to increase road usage and polution is rediculous. Not to mention the extra noise polution.
C
colin haines
11 years ago
Why should we be blighted by the greed of foreign consortiums. And the chaos created during construction will render the surrounding infastructure a no go area for years.
M
Mark Kelly
11 years ago
No 3 rd runway I will not have mine and my families quality of life ruined by noise and pollution that will come with all the extra flight, go to Gatwick or build by the coast planes land over the sea and take foo over the sea
A
Anthony Mullard
11 years ago
Why not do as the Chinese did with Hong Kong they spent their money on a purpose built airport to cater for the needs of the future. Stop trying to make a silk purse out of a sows ear!!
more sensible to expand Gatwick
I am under the pathway at work and cannot continue with 'phone calls when an aircraft goes over.
Pollutin, noise, congestion, increased danger of accidents: no thanks!
please send details of the rally
The impact upon the highly populated suburbs of West London of a third runway at Heathrow is totally unacceptable, in terms both of noise and of air pollution. Expansion at Gatwick would be a less damaging option. Better still would be no airport expansion at all; increased air travel is unnecessary and damaging at a time when the urgent need is to reduce our carbon emissions.
Under NO circumstances should LHR be expanded! Gatwick is better suited but the best option is a completely new airport away from all residential development. It's about time people were put before the profits of business!
no3rd runway.the benefits have been exagerrated
.
no
The pollution to our lungs is very heavy already plus more nocive fumes to our health such as noice and traffic congestion
It is just unnaceptable
polution ,crowded roads, noise,
Not cost effective or of other significant benefit.
I am totally against, plans to build a 3rd runway, more pollution & unacceptable noise levels, no thanks
Heathrow is slap bang in the middle of a highly populated area with thousands of people underneath 3rd runway would result in monstrous noise levels
I am totally against, plans to build a 3rd runway, more pollution, more homes lost, we was promised by the out prime minister, this would not happen, if he got elected, he cannot go back on his word?
The approach roads are barely capable of handling the traffic from London so to increase road usage and polution is rediculous. Not to mention the extra noise polution.
Why should we be blighted by the greed of foreign consortiums. And the chaos created during construction will render the surrounding infastructure a no go area for years.
No 3 rd runway I will not have mine and my families quality of life ruined by noise and pollution that will come with all the extra flight, go to Gatwick or build by the coast planes land over the sea and take foo over the sea
Why not do as the Chinese did with Hong Kong they spent their money on a purpose built airport to cater for the needs of the future. Stop trying to make a silk purse out of a sows ear!!