A better solution must be found if not, still do not build it. The South East is already too built up with too many people and to be honest ugly.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
It's already too noisy at my house, with regular flights before 06:00
D
Dan Miller
11 years ago
Heathrow is just in too built up an area with too much traffic already
M
Mrs G Gillespie
11 years ago
I have been back from my holiday for 3 days, I am angry that in this time I have had aircraft noise and pollution for every 1 minuet since my return...Please relocate the 3rd runway where no one has to suffer this daily onslaught
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
It's well known that the huge number of transfer flights that pass through Heathrow have no impact on our economy. These passengers are not at Heathrow to do business with the UK and the only benefit this brings is to Spanish-owned BAA who gain some custom in their terminal shops and and the runway slot fee. 28% of the people in Europe affected by aircraft noise already live under the Heathrow flight path, and with most cities choosing to locate their airports by the sea or in sparsely populated areas, it's easy to see why such huge numbers suffer here.
G
graeme cornish
11 years ago
This would be plane madness.!
D
Diane Scott
11 years ago
I am against all airport expansion.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
We put up with more than enough aircraft noise as it is. Any more would be intolerable.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
why not the Midlands especially if HP2 gets the go ahead.
C
Christopher snell
11 years ago
There enough noise from aircraft in Bracknell now without more from another Heathrow runway. We have has plenty of lies about the noise already fro Heathrow authorities.
A
A Listopad
11 years ago
No thank you! We do not have the capacity for MORE carbon emissions!
P
P. Nivelles
11 years ago
The noise pollution would be intolerable
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
noise pollution, air pollution, overall congestion, unbearable.
E
Edward Page
11 years ago
air pollution, noise, people losing their homes,increased traffic congestion.
R
r havercroft
11 years ago
criminal if allowed
G
GEORGE LOBLEY
11 years ago
Vested interests favour the expansion of Heathrow which will be expensive. Gatwick is the natural option for expansion as it is underdeveloped and would cost much less to expand.
F
feliks morozgalski
11 years ago
I have moved from Isleworth to get away from noise pollution and now it seems to be following me! Concord was very noisy and having more places flying at night into the esrly morning seems too much I agree with the thought that a terroristbattack ver west London his a possibility so no expansion west try east Lonson
V
Vanda Foster
11 years ago
West London has too little access and already suffers too much in the way of noise and pollution. Any promises on restricting the numbers of flights will not last.
C
CATHERINE STEWART
11 years ago
IT IS ALREADY NOISIER THAN IT USED TO BE AND THE ROADS ARE BAD ENOUGH.
A
Anonymous
11 years ago
The noise from airplanes is bad enough now without extra runway !!
A better solution must be found if not, still do not build it. The South East is already too built up with too many people and to be honest ugly.
It's already too noisy at my house, with regular flights before 06:00
Heathrow is just in too built up an area with too much traffic already
I have been back from my holiday for 3 days, I am angry that in this time I have had aircraft noise and pollution for every 1 minuet since my return...Please relocate the 3rd runway where no one has to suffer this daily onslaught
It's well known that the huge number of transfer flights that pass through Heathrow have no impact on our economy. These passengers are not at Heathrow to do business with the UK and the only benefit this brings is to Spanish-owned BAA who gain some custom in their terminal shops and and the runway slot fee. 28% of the people in Europe affected by aircraft noise already live under the Heathrow flight path, and with most cities choosing to locate their airports by the sea or in sparsely populated areas, it's easy to see why such huge numbers suffer here.
This would be plane madness.!
I am against all airport expansion.
We put up with more than enough aircraft noise as it is. Any more would be intolerable.
why not the Midlands especially if HP2 gets the go ahead.
There enough noise from aircraft in Bracknell now without more from another Heathrow runway. We have has plenty of lies about the noise already fro Heathrow authorities.
No thank you! We do not have the capacity for MORE carbon emissions!
The noise pollution would be intolerable
noise pollution, air pollution, overall congestion, unbearable.
air pollution, noise, people losing their homes,increased traffic congestion.
criminal if allowed
Vested interests favour the expansion of Heathrow which will be expensive. Gatwick is the natural option for expansion as it is underdeveloped and would cost much less to expand.
I have moved from Isleworth to get away from noise pollution and now it seems to be following me! Concord was very noisy and having more places flying at night into the esrly morning seems too much I agree with the thought that a terroristbattack ver west London his a possibility so no expansion west try east Lonson
West London has too little access and already suffers too much in the way of noise and pollution. Any promises on restricting the numbers of flights will not last.
IT IS ALREADY NOISIER THAN IT USED TO BE AND THE ROADS ARE BAD ENOUGH.
The noise from airplanes is bad enough now without extra runway !!