there are wider alternatives with less impact, an accident would have shocking consequences too.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I don't agree with a third runway being built . It is disruptive enough already.
S
Shaheen
10 years ago
We are already suffering from pollution, noise and environmental damage. Please think of the families, children and elderly who can't afford to move.
S
sylvia eaton
10 years ago
noise and pollution and possible monopoly
J
Jennifer Rachel
10 years ago
Windsor is already intolerable with an easterly wind. There are already far too many people subjected to this torment.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
We already have to many planes going over our house. You tell to reduce pollution!!!!!!
J
J M Baker
10 years ago
No to noise pollusion & congestion
M
Margaret Stevens
10 years ago
Please do not add another runway at Heathrow; the noise level is already very intrusive and any increase would be intolerable. Thank you.
K
Kathy Comer
10 years ago
Gatwick is the obvious answer
J
John Terry
10 years ago
Why pander to BAA's greed - There are far better and less intolerable solutions.
M
Mr and Mrs Bennett
10 years ago
More noise, pollution and congestion, we don't need it! We're sure there must be another answer.Think of all the people who wil lose their homes, bet the supporters won't lose theirs.
R
Ray Watts
10 years ago
On all counts - Gatwick is the better option. On air quality alone the Heathrow option must be defeated.
V
valerie
10 years ago
No to Heathrow Expansion
K
Keith Perry
10 years ago
The cas put foorward by Heathrow did not refrain from lies about its opponents and had consistntly cooked the book on pollution and noise levels.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
There is to much polution in the area already without adding a 3rd runway
there are wider alternatives with less impact, an accident would have shocking consequences too.
I don't agree with a third runway being built . It is disruptive enough already.
We are already suffering from pollution, noise and environmental damage. Please think of the families, children and elderly who can't afford to move.
noise and pollution and possible monopoly
Windsor is already intolerable with an easterly wind. There are already far too many people subjected to this torment.
We already have to many planes going over our house. You tell to reduce pollution!!!!!!
No to noise pollusion & congestion
Please do not add another runway at Heathrow; the noise level is already very intrusive and any increase would be intolerable. Thank you.
Gatwick is the obvious answer
Why pander to BAA's greed - There are far better and less intolerable solutions.
More noise, pollution and congestion, we don't need it! We're sure there must be another answer.Think of all the people who wil lose their homes, bet the supporters won't lose theirs.
On all counts - Gatwick is the better option. On air quality alone the Heathrow option must be defeated.
No to Heathrow Expansion
The cas put foorward by Heathrow did not refrain from lies about its opponents and had consistntly cooked the book on pollution and noise levels.
There is to much polution in the area already without adding a 3rd runway
no more noise pollution
Too much noise, traffic and polution
Too much noise and traffic as it is
No to 3rd runway @ Heathrow
Too much noise and traffic as it is