It is time to find an alternative to Heathrow. I do not wish to be responsible for people losing their homes, not to mention the loss of Grow Heathrow. Heathrow is just not practical anymore
T
Tamaryn Long
10 years ago
The noise level, traffic, pollution, are all key reasons not to allow this to go ahead. Rather improve rail links between Heathrow and other surrounding London airports, and grow those with more space around them to grow. This would also benefit by decrease rail traffic into london, by create an "outer london" rail network that provides improved connections.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Too many people will loose their homes if this plan goes ahead. LGW has more room for another runway
D
Debra Mumford
10 years ago
It is a big mistake and would cause excess pollution. We live in a small overcrowded country has it is without adding to the problem. The country can cope with the airports that we have.
P
Peter Lucas
10 years ago
No ifs, no buts, no new runways
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Don't NEED a third runway use the funds for the NEEDED NHS or SOCIAL HEALTH CARE or SCHOOLS / EDUCATION or WATERPROOFING FLOODED AREAS , or POLICING Overal any several area which NEEDS OUR TAXES! !
I
Igor Hustava
10 years ago
No need for third runway
D
David Ross
10 years ago
You should not be destroying peoples homes and villages.
M
MIKE RAZZELL
10 years ago
We have to stop this purely on environmental grounds
J
Jonas Frantz
10 years ago
A third runway is insanity! And why are they flying over London when it's not necessary?
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
The Airport Commission's report is a sick joke which defies common sense and the hope of a decent quality of life for the millions of people living under the flightpath at the moment. Gatwick OBVIOUSLY!!
L
LOiam McCarthy
10 years ago
Hi i think this should go ahead so i can use it.
L
LOiam McCarthy
10 years ago
Hi i think this should go ahead so i can use it.
A
Adam Scarth
10 years ago
i think that the run way should go ahead
J
John Rollinson
10 years ago
3rd runway = pollution. Pollution is CO2, exhaust fumes AND more impotantly increased noise duration for West London, and Berkshire residents. Notwithstanding the ever present risk of an aircraft coming down in arguably the most populated area in the UK. NO NO NO 3rd runway.
M
Mrs. Jill Murray
10 years ago
To expand Heathrow further would be to blight yet another large area of South West London. It would make much more sense to expand Gatwick or Stansted or even Luton.
A
Archie Halliday
10 years ago
noise levels and pollution.
K
Katina Wilson
10 years ago
There is enough noise already from flights in and out of Heathrow!!! Planes seem to have been flying much lower over Molesey this year, hence more noise!!
M
Mark Wilson
10 years ago
Too much noise and pollution at present, cut back!
R
Rachael Anne Roberts
10 years ago
If we let people who have money think that they have power over the residents of Sipson now, where does it end, how many more towns will e destroyed in the name of 'progress'?
It is time to find an alternative to Heathrow. I do not wish to be responsible for people losing their homes, not to mention the loss of Grow Heathrow. Heathrow is just not practical anymore
The noise level, traffic, pollution, are all key reasons not to allow this to go ahead. Rather improve rail links between Heathrow and other surrounding London airports, and grow those with more space around them to grow. This would also benefit by decrease rail traffic into london, by create an "outer london" rail network that provides improved connections.
Too many people will loose their homes if this plan goes ahead. LGW has more room for another runway
It is a big mistake and would cause excess pollution. We live in a small overcrowded country has it is without adding to the problem. The country can cope with the airports that we have.
No ifs, no buts, no new runways
Don't NEED a third runway use the funds for the NEEDED NHS or SOCIAL HEALTH CARE or SCHOOLS / EDUCATION or WATERPROOFING FLOODED AREAS , or POLICING Overal any several area which NEEDS OUR TAXES! !
No need for third runway
You should not be destroying peoples homes and villages.
We have to stop this purely on environmental grounds
A third runway is insanity! And why are they flying over London when it's not necessary?
The Airport Commission's report is a sick joke which defies common sense and the hope of a decent quality of life for the millions of people living under the flightpath at the moment. Gatwick OBVIOUSLY!!
Hi i think this should go ahead so i can use it.
Hi i think this should go ahead so i can use it.
i think that the run way should go ahead
3rd runway = pollution. Pollution is CO2, exhaust fumes AND more impotantly increased noise duration for West London, and Berkshire residents. Notwithstanding the ever present risk of an aircraft coming down in arguably the most populated area in the UK. NO NO NO 3rd runway.
To expand Heathrow further would be to blight yet another large area of South West London. It would make much more sense to expand Gatwick or Stansted or even Luton.
noise levels and pollution.
There is enough noise already from flights in and out of Heathrow!!! Planes seem to have been flying much lower over Molesey this year, hence more noise!!
Too much noise and pollution at present, cut back!
If we let people who have money think that they have power over the residents of Sipson now, where does it end, how many more towns will e destroyed in the name of 'progress'?