There are much fairer ways of achieving this rather than piling more noise and pollution upon the people already under the present flight paths.
J
Judith Mirzoeff
12 years ago
I remember when T4 was definitely going to be the last expansion. Time to stop this assault on the whole of London.
L
LUCA SANTILLI
12 years ago
The noise form Heathrow airport is already vry difficult to bear. A third runaway is not acceptable.
M
michael hall
12 years ago
The noise and pollution is an act of vandalism against London - making the problem worse is simply criminal
A
Andrew Harvey
12 years ago
Boris island makes good sense - the cost would be reduced by redevelopment of Heathrow for housing
R
Rosemary wolf
12 years ago
Expansion of Heathrow is not acceptable to the thousands of Londoners who live under the flight path
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Say no to hathrow expansion
M
Marie-Anne Hoffer
12 years ago
Heathrow does NOT need a third runway. Expand Stansted and Gatwick instead or build Thames Estuary.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
heatherow expansion is not the solution, it will be fought hard
S
susanne groom
12 years ago
life in west London is already blighted by constant aircraft noise. No other country in EU suffers in this way. What about our human rights to enjoy some quiet time???
B
Bill Burgess
12 years ago
The pollusion levels from the additional flights will cause added health issues and a strain on the already overloaded NHS systems..
A
Antony Vinall
12 years ago
Heathrow is choked with congestion and surrounded by people's homes. Utter folly to cram even more aircraft in.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Listen to the local people - it doesn't make sense when there are other better options
T
Thomas Mason
12 years ago
More capacity merely creates more journeys in a never ending cycle.
M
Maundy Todd
12 years ago
Temperature on the M25 at Heathrow is 2 degrees warmer than around the rest of the M25. Flightpath to Heathrow is along the whole of central London - 9/11 shows us what can happen. Gatwick has open coutnryside and the sea close and could be reached in 25 mins from Heathrow by shuttle train. Plenty of other airports do it. The jobs will not be lost at Heathrow, it is still has a good communication hub and if linked to Gatwick will remain as vibrant
C
christine gibson
12 years ago
I strongly oppose the expansion of Heathrow Airport and support the argument for a new airport in the Thames Estuary
D
David Hill
12 years ago
It makes no sense to create further blockage west of London where traffic is already congested. Neither does it seem prudent to increase the risk of aircraft flying over the capital where a disaster can only be waiting to happen.
S
Steph Cartwright
12 years ago
Unbelievable that after the official recommendations from past enquiries (not to mention the vast amount of public money spent) that the government is hell bent on going ahead with expansion at Heathrow.
There are much fairer ways of achieving this rather than piling more noise and pollution upon the people already under the present flight paths.
I remember when T4 was definitely going to be the last expansion. Time to stop this assault on the whole of London.
The noise form Heathrow airport is already vry difficult to bear. A third runaway is not acceptable.
The noise and pollution is an act of vandalism against London - making the problem worse is simply criminal
Boris island makes good sense - the cost would be reduced by redevelopment of Heathrow for housing
Expansion of Heathrow is not acceptable to the thousands of Londoners who live under the flight path
Say no to hathrow expansion
Heathrow does NOT need a third runway. Expand Stansted and Gatwick instead or build Thames Estuary.
heatherow expansion is not the solution, it will be fought hard
life in west London is already blighted by constant aircraft noise. No other country in EU suffers in this way. What about our human rights to enjoy some quiet time???
The pollusion levels from the additional flights will cause added health issues and a strain on the already overloaded NHS systems..
Heathrow is choked with congestion and surrounded by people's homes. Utter folly to cram even more aircraft in.
Listen to the local people - it doesn't make sense when there are other better options
More capacity merely creates more journeys in a never ending cycle.
Temperature on the M25 at Heathrow is 2 degrees warmer than around the rest of the M25. Flightpath to Heathrow is along the whole of central London - 9/11 shows us what can happen. Gatwick has open coutnryside and the sea close and could be reached in 25 mins from Heathrow by shuttle train. Plenty of other airports do it. The jobs will not be lost at Heathrow, it is still has a good communication hub and if linked to Gatwick will remain as vibrant
I strongly oppose the expansion of Heathrow Airport and support the argument for a new airport in the Thames Estuary
It makes no sense to create further blockage west of London where traffic is already congested. Neither does it seem prudent to increase the risk of aircraft flying over the capital where a disaster can only be waiting to happen.
Unbelievable that after the official recommendations from past enquiries (not to mention the vast amount of public money spent) that the government is hell bent on going ahead with expansion at Heathrow.
this petition will be sent to all my contacts
Don't do it