just moved to Ham and would not want the level of plane noise to increase.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Heathrow alternative expansion will cause a hugely significant lower number of residents to be inconvienienced.
S
Stephen Heath
10 years ago
Oppose any additional flights on the grounds of noise polution and disturbance to residents
A
Andrew
10 years ago
Too much noise and pollution already. We need to find another solution.
L
Liam King
10 years ago
I oppose the expansion of Heathrow very strongly on the grounds of noise and pollution
G
gael somerville
10 years ago
Heathrow are liars; they promised no more expansion if they got T4, then definitely no more if they got T5. They want to make money for their foreign owners and concrete over West London, destroying lives and the planet while they are at it.
A
Ana fernandez
10 years ago
Flights to and from Heathrow already have huge detrimental impact on our very quiet street. I don't want that to get any worse
G
gill frayn
10 years ago
Difficult to stomach the extent to which vested interests now wreak havoc with even health and safety issues in the UK. if Thames
D
D Wylds
10 years ago
No new runway homes lost noise,pollution,,it's full now,The cost,Gatwick it must be,.we would cop it in more in Berkshire.Just say no no no and let us get on with our lives
K
Kathryn johnson
10 years ago
The increase in flights over the last twelve months is already intolerable
R
Robert Campbell
10 years ago
Continued expansion of Heathrow throughout the 21st century will not be the answer. Now is the time for government to invest in infrastructure: a new Thames Estuary airport and associated rail links would best provide for the future. Otherwise, coordinated expansion of Gatwick, Stansted and Luton would be an acceptable alternative but only for the shorter term.
M
Marcel Nobrega
10 years ago
NO FOR HEATHROW EXPANSION
M
Mr Dhami
10 years ago
Too much pollution
A
Anna Coad
10 years ago
No more noise in sw6
G
Gerald Cooper
10 years ago
No-No-No- to Heathrow expansion. We have a housing crisis in this area expansion will mean destroying beautiful houses and villages. Also access roads will not cope with increased traffic. New access will have to be built. Even then we will only have 3 runways. Schiphol airport in Holland has 7 runways available 24/7. Heathrow is the wrong airport in the wrong place.
M
Mudabbir Mohammed
10 years ago
The heathrow expansion project is poorly planned and does not take into account the additional disruption and loss of peoples livelihoods in the area , at present heathrow infrastructure barely copes with servicing the needs of the traveller effectively,its all about profit and financial gain. Gatwick has the scope for development
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Madness to expand an airport that has a flight path over the largest city in UK
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Lived in Thames Dittion Surrey for years and air traffic had got steadily worse
P
Paul Butler
10 years ago
I live 100mile east of Heathrow but below the flight path of aircraft between London and North America. The tranquility of the area is destroy by the noise of high flying aircraft. On rare days when there is a clear blue sky it is spoiled by continually aircraft condenstion trails which expand into a pale haze. Any increase of air traffic into London and the south East along this flightpath will make this worse. I also have a 200 mile round journey to fly out of Britain. Expansion of regional airports serves Britain better and is less polluting and environmentally better.
Move
just moved to Ham and would not want the level of plane noise to increase.
Heathrow alternative expansion will cause a hugely significant lower number of residents to be inconvienienced.
Oppose any additional flights on the grounds of noise polution and disturbance to residents
Too much noise and pollution already. We need to find another solution.
I oppose the expansion of Heathrow very strongly on the grounds of noise and pollution
Heathrow are liars; they promised no more expansion if they got T4, then definitely no more if they got T5. They want to make money for their foreign owners and concrete over West London, destroying lives and the planet while they are at it.
Flights to and from Heathrow already have huge detrimental impact on our very quiet street. I don't want that to get any worse
Difficult to stomach the extent to which vested interests now wreak havoc with even health and safety issues in the UK. if Thames
No new runway homes lost noise,pollution,,it's full now,The cost,Gatwick it must be,.we would cop it in more in Berkshire.Just say no no no and let us get on with our lives
The increase in flights over the last twelve months is already intolerable
Continued expansion of Heathrow throughout the 21st century will not be the answer. Now is the time for government to invest in infrastructure: a new Thames Estuary airport and associated rail links would best provide for the future. Otherwise, coordinated expansion of Gatwick, Stansted and Luton would be an acceptable alternative but only for the shorter term.
NO FOR HEATHROW EXPANSION
Too much pollution
No more noise in sw6
No-No-No- to Heathrow expansion. We have a housing crisis in this area expansion will mean destroying beautiful houses and villages. Also access roads will not cope with increased traffic. New access will have to be built. Even then we will only have 3 runways. Schiphol airport in Holland has 7 runways available 24/7. Heathrow is the wrong airport in the wrong place.
The heathrow expansion project is poorly planned and does not take into account the additional disruption and loss of peoples livelihoods in the area , at present heathrow infrastructure barely copes with servicing the needs of the traveller effectively,its all about profit and financial gain. Gatwick has the scope for development
Madness to expand an airport that has a flight path over the largest city in UK
Lived in Thames Dittion Surrey for years and air traffic had got steadily worse
I live 100mile east of Heathrow but below the flight path of aircraft between London and North America. The tranquility of the area is destroy by the noise of high flying aircraft. On rare days when there is a clear blue sky it is spoiled by continually aircraft condenstion trails which expand into a pale haze. Any increase of air traffic into London and the south East along this flightpath will make this worse. I also have a 200 mile round journey to fly out of Britain. Expansion of regional airports serves Britain better and is less polluting and environmentally better.