Any such plans to destroy people's homes and history of small villages is savage, barbaric and down right cheap. Anything for a government to make us pay more tax and for local residents to put up with more noise pollution. The whole pollution levels and noise levels must be fixed because there is no way they can claim it won't rise, common sense says it clearly will rise.
Y
Yoji Caird
9 years ago
They should shove that runway up their orifices.
C
Chris Morgan
9 years ago
I love the way the people who live in the village's that are not going to be touched are say I g bring it on. Different story if their houses were down for demolition. Also different story if someone in the governments house was affected.
E
Eleanor Sturge
9 years ago
There are at least two alternatives to this plan, which would not be anything like as intrusive or damaging to the environment or to peoples' wellbeing. it is iniquitous to impose this on Londoners. You only have to fly in at night over Gatwick to see how much more sensible it would be to expand that airport, where very few people would have their lives disrupted as opposed to Heathrow where you are virtually landing ontop of homes.
G
Gary Duff
9 years ago
The future will prove that adding more planes in the sky is not the answer...
I
Ian McMillan
9 years ago
Say no to the runway.
Y
Yin Htay
9 years ago
We have already had enough plane noises from Heathrow!
M
Ms S Rowlands
9 years ago
Pollution problems and people will lose their homes. A mad and bad idea!
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
there are organisations all over London and the south east opposed to this decision. Surely it's ti
B
Bob Bennett
9 years ago
Shameful Decision
D
Dimitry Zolotorev
9 years ago
Such a terrible idea
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
People before profit. Scandalous.
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
Unbelievable decision! Heathrow is situated in a very built up area. This will substantially increase air traffic, noise pollution, air pollution and even the risk of an accident.
D
David woodall
9 years ago
people matter
S
sally louise joes
9 years ago
The people that live in this area should not have to move and make room for a new run way-disgraceful-
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
This country is tiny, less people, less building, less is more its not all about London
A
Ali Firaas Hassan
9 years ago
Greater protection boundary of the largesst airport must to green belt. Why not Manston Airport reopen here...?
M
Malcolm Pitts
9 years ago
This is a terrible idea - what happened to the government's commitment to reducing carbon dioxide emissions? This idiotic idea is going to help accelerate global warming. Think about it, Mrs May - do you want to go down in history as the UK Prime Minister who helped to seal the fate of humanity?
A
Andrew Middleton
9 years ago
I'm just amazed the decision has been made to go ahead! Why?! We've got too much pollution as it is!
CB1 3SX
Any such plans to destroy people's homes and history of small villages is savage, barbaric and down right cheap. Anything for a government to make us pay more tax and for local residents to put up with more noise pollution. The whole pollution levels and noise levels must be fixed because there is no way they can claim it won't rise, common sense says it clearly will rise.
They should shove that runway up their orifices.
I love the way the people who live in the village's that are not going to be touched are say I g bring it on. Different story if their houses were down for demolition. Also different story if someone in the governments house was affected.
There are at least two alternatives to this plan, which would not be anything like as intrusive or damaging to the environment or to peoples' wellbeing. it is iniquitous to impose this on Londoners. You only have to fly in at night over Gatwick to see how much more sensible it would be to expand that airport, where very few people would have their lives disrupted as opposed to Heathrow where you are virtually landing ontop of homes.
The future will prove that adding more planes in the sky is not the answer...
Say no to the runway.
We have already had enough plane noises from Heathrow!
Pollution problems and people will lose their homes. A mad and bad idea!
there are organisations all over London and the south east opposed to this decision. Surely it's ti
Shameful Decision
Such a terrible idea
People before profit. Scandalous.
Unbelievable decision! Heathrow is situated in a very built up area. This will substantially increase air traffic, noise pollution, air pollution and even the risk of an accident.
people matter
The people that live in this area should not have to move and make room for a new run way-disgraceful-
This country is tiny, less people, less building, less is more its not all about London
Greater protection boundary of the largesst airport must to green belt. Why not Manston Airport reopen here...?
This is a terrible idea - what happened to the government's commitment to reducing carbon dioxide emissions? This idiotic idea is going to help accelerate global warming. Think about it, Mrs May - do you want to go down in history as the UK Prime Minister who helped to seal the fate of humanity?
I'm just amazed the decision has been made to go ahead! Why?! We've got too much pollution as it is!