A third of the population affected by aircraftt noise in Europe are W Londoners - this has to stop.
G
Gillian Hartnell
12 years ago
I am completely against any future expansion of Heathrow Airport for reasons of noise nuisance, pollution and potential accidents.
J
Jayne Harvey
12 years ago
This is outrageous you are even attempting to try to do this again - knowing full well it is an utterly flawed idea and how many people are against it for so many valid reasons. Noticeable the delay in timing is potentially AFTER the elections because it is so unpopular.
F
fwandy01 Stickland
12 years ago
Crazy to put fly more planes over one of the most populated parts of Britain.
C
Clare Nash
12 years ago
David Cameron's election manifestor promised no more expansion at Heathrow. Why does he not honour his promise? The infrastructure cannot cope properly now, any expansion would overwhelm us. And we cannot simply take more land and homes to sacrifice to this monster. It is big enough.
T
tim haywood
12 years ago
The infrastructure around Heathrow already cannot cope. The noise is unbearable to local residents.
R
Roderick White
12 years ago
Ho can david Cameron live with himself after earlier denials if he even contemplates a 3rd runway at Heathrow?
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
No to the Heathrow expansion
T
Tony Wilkinson
12 years ago
THIS SIMPLY CANNOT HAPPEN, LETS FACE IT HOW DOES THIS SIT WITH DOING SOMETHING USEFUL TOWARDS GLOBAL WARMING
S
Susan Kerr
12 years ago
Woken many many days at 4.45 by flightpath this last month, please have mercy.
A
alan jessop
12 years ago
This proposal must not proceed and the wishes of the people must take priority over big business.
D
Duncan Hayward
12 years ago
Take action
S
Stephanie white
12 years ago
W43HA
E
Erol Sukan
12 years ago
NO to Heathrow expansion!!!!!!
S
Steve Newbold
12 years ago
I trust the PM will be true to his 2010 election commitments
G
G W WQHITE
12 years ago
It is not only noise that presents a problem. It is the impact of pollution, both from the the increased numbers of aircraft and the inhcreased traffic that an enlarged airport would generate, that is a cause for great concern. I am surprised that the Governement has not commisioned a study on the actual health of thoe living under the flight paths, compared with those living outside them which would indicate the impact the prersent airport has on health. This shoiuld be done before any expansion is contemplated
J
Judith Strong
12 years ago
Featured
There has been little discussion as to who fill fill the low paid service jobs which an expanded Heathrow will generate - if not already living in the area new residents will need to be brought in and then housed - where and with what level of subsidy?
L
Lindsay Codsi
12 years ago
I live in Chiswick and the noise pollution is already excessive. Any expansion at Heathrow would make life intolerable. There are better alternatives. Please listen to our voices. We do NOT want this.
C
Cllr Ruth Cadbury
12 years ago
After being promised by this Government there would be no 3rd Runway, tens of thousands of people
J
Jon Ruffell
12 years ago
There's enough noise in Richmond borough not to warrant a 3rd runway. This should be about how it affects local residents and the impact on both the environment and community rather than national and political economics
A third of the population affected by aircraftt noise in Europe are W Londoners - this has to stop.
I am completely against any future expansion of Heathrow Airport for reasons of noise nuisance, pollution and potential accidents.
This is outrageous you are even attempting to try to do this again - knowing full well it is an utterly flawed idea and how many people are against it for so many valid reasons. Noticeable the delay in timing is potentially AFTER the elections because it is so unpopular.
Crazy to put fly more planes over one of the most populated parts of Britain.
David Cameron's election manifestor promised no more expansion at Heathrow. Why does he not honour his promise? The infrastructure cannot cope properly now, any expansion would overwhelm us. And we cannot simply take more land and homes to sacrifice to this monster. It is big enough.
The infrastructure around Heathrow already cannot cope. The noise is unbearable to local residents.
Ho can david Cameron live with himself after earlier denials if he even contemplates a 3rd runway at Heathrow?
No to the Heathrow expansion
THIS SIMPLY CANNOT HAPPEN, LETS FACE IT HOW DOES THIS SIT WITH DOING SOMETHING USEFUL TOWARDS GLOBAL WARMING
Woken many many days at 4.45 by flightpath this last month, please have mercy.
This proposal must not proceed and the wishes of the people must take priority over big business.
Take action
W43HA
NO to Heathrow expansion!!!!!!
I trust the PM will be true to his 2010 election commitments
It is not only noise that presents a problem. It is the impact of pollution, both from the the increased numbers of aircraft and the inhcreased traffic that an enlarged airport would generate, that is a cause for great concern. I am surprised that the Governement has not commisioned a study on the actual health of thoe living under the flight paths, compared with those living outside them which would indicate the impact the prersent airport has on health. This shoiuld be done before any expansion is contemplated
There has been little discussion as to who fill fill the low paid service jobs which an expanded Heathrow will generate - if not already living in the area new residents will need to be brought in and then housed - where and with what level of subsidy?
I live in Chiswick and the noise pollution is already excessive. Any expansion at Heathrow would make life intolerable. There are better alternatives. Please listen to our voices. We do NOT want this.
After being promised by this Government there would be no 3rd Runway, tens of thousands of people
There's enough noise in Richmond borough not to warrant a 3rd runway. This should be about how it affects local residents and the impact on both the environment and community rather than national and political economics