- NO - PG&E Substation on Watsonville Road Corridor

These locations are a truly horrible idea!

No.

ABSOLUTELY NO WAY!

The Uvas-Watsonville Road area is one of the few remaining scenic country roads in our region. Please find a more industrial area for this project.

Why damage the beauty and serenity of a rural area to accommodate the growing electricity needs of cities? Save construction costs and expensive litigation by simply installing solar panels on homes in the area?

The plant would destroy the beauty of Uvas -Watsonville Rd area. Needs to be in industrial area

3rd generation family from Morgan Hill. These areas are well remembered by me and now my children. Please don't spoil our wonderful area. Stop.

We don't want this substation at the Watsonville C site!!!

NO! this seems completely at odds with the development of this area as a wine district and tourist destination.

NO!!!

Keep are beautiful wine corridor as is. Expansion to the existing site is the only location that makes sense.

The existing PG&E site on Main Ave. in Morgan Hill makes the most sense. It already has the look and feel. Why alter another location that is still natural?

Of the proposed sites presented, the existing PG&E site along Main Ave in Morgan Hill is where the upgrade should occur.

Please. Do not harm the rural areas of Santa Clara County unnecessarily. There are plenty of areas closer to the 101 corridor that would not harm the natural beauty of the area.

PG&E doesn't NEED another substation SITE. Especially one located in the designated scenic road area of the Watsonville Rd corridor. Even PG&E lists the existing sub-station in Morgan Hill as a potential site. That is the site that should be used.

I am writing about the proposed Watsonville-B site. There really is a very possible solution to this problem, which is simply the expansion of the already existing substation in Morgan Hill on the Main St facility I vote against having the Watsonville road corridor values and scenic beauty be degraded because of the power substation development. Peter Ecclesine 11960 Calle Cielo, Gilroy, CA 95020

the substation will decrease property values along this scenic Watsonville Rd between Morgan Hill and Gilroy. The water resources are very limited in this area and the substation may have a negative impact on the water supply, as well as the land and property values along this corridor. There really is a very possible solution to this problem, which is simply the expansion of the already existing substation in Morgan Hill on the Main St facility I vote against having the Watsonville road corridor values and scenic beauty be degraded because of the power substation development. Frank Leonardi 12310 Calle Celestina, Gilroy CA 95020

This corridor and road G8 have been designated as a scenic byway. Please do not add a substation which will detract from the beauty and could potentially eliminate wildlife space.

I vote no. Do not destroy the beauty of our rural area.

No PGE substations around here on Watsonville Road!