Skip to main content

No Full Liquor License in former Miladys Bar

45 Comments

H
Hillary Butler
11 years ago

This is a quiet corner of nyc. 4am is simply too late. It promotes drunk people talking loudly on the street when residents are trying to sleep.

B
Big Frank
11 years ago

Please don't allow another bar in this area.

M
Michael Robinson
11 years ago

Hope this helps

R
Richard Harpootlian
11 years ago

IWhen Milady's was open I never got a good nights sleep.

R
Robert Orlando
11 years ago

keep the Neighborhood Quiet please

C
catheirne Hayes Janis
11 years ago

Listen to the residents.

P
Paul Tschinkel
11 years ago

Our neighborhood can not afford a noise infested establishment that stays open till the wee hours of the morning. People live here and have done so for many years. We have developed our neighborhood and deserve our peace and quiet during the night. We do not want to have our environs exploited by money hungry newcomers. We started this community and deserve the respect that is due us. We've worked long and hard to make SOHO.

W
william green
11 years ago

this remains a predominantly residential neighborhood which will be only negatively impacted by another, perhaps the worst, of late night venues for loud patrons and services

S
Susie Price
11 years ago

We absolutely do not want a nightclub open until 4am in our quiet residential street. There are families and working adults who need a good night's sleep, and I can't see this being a "good fit" for the community. Before when Milady's was still open (and no offense to their fans) there'd be people talking, and hanging out in front of our apartment way after closing. I don't miss those days. So please NO FULL LIQUOR LICENSE whatsoever!

E
Elizabeth Sabo
11 years ago

Bar proliferation in our neighborhoods has really gone over the top.

M
Marta Fair
11 years ago

I do live several blocks away, thank goodness, but walk home from work along Prince street some late evenings. Of course I can find another way, but should residents have to avoid one street after another to avoid harm from patrons of an establishment? As with another club, closer to me that thankfully closed after great community pressure it seems so strange an idea that a club such as this would elect to open within a small, very residential community where old and young wish only to walk freely outside their homes without incident. There are so very many blocks in Manhattan whose businesses open 9-6. They are empty of people un the evening and late into early morning. I guess I understand the attraction of club owners to quaint narrow streets and charming homes and stores, but their clubs in empty neighborhood could create their own charm, with a little effort, and escape the stress of constant suits to close down from neighbors.

M
m. campo
11 years ago

the martignetti brothers have shown themselves over, and over again, to be bad operators. this application must be firmly denied by community board 2… ………..and the SLA!

E
Elizabeth Mann
11 years ago

No residential neighborhood should be subject to constant quality of life violations by a hostile bar.

S
Styra Avins
11 years ago

The disintegration of a really pleasant residential neighborhood is not what I call progress. No full liquor license for a bar that stays open until 4:00 a.m. at the corner of Prince and Thompson St.

S
Styra Avins
11 years ago

The disintegration of a really pleasant residential neighborhood is not what I call progress. No full liquor license for a bar that stays open until 4:00 a.m. at the corner of Prince and Thompson St.

S
Steven Bard
11 years ago

I live nearby. The Martignetti Brothers' notoriety in running disruptive, late-night clubs that only masquerade as "local" bars is established fact. Their history of misrepresentation to the NYSLA and indifference to the norms of decency to neighbors are enough for the NYS Liquor Authority to reject their latest cockamamie scheme to transfer their insolent abuses to a new locale. Please reject the Martignetti Brothers’ application. Thank you.

D
Dana Nash
11 years ago

I live next door to this location. The spill over into the street of smokers and rowdiness as well as people sitting on my stoop blocking entrance to my building would be inevitable. This is detrimental to the right to peace and quiet in one's living environment. I'm realistic about restaurants in the neighborhood and enjoy their presence. A bar is a another matter and unwelcome.

J
John Price
11 years ago

No to full liquor license for old Miladys space. The noise and disturbances are unwelcome.

H
Henry Goldstein
11 years ago

we don't need another bar in SoHo.

C
Chris McGinnis
11 years ago

The residents of this neighborhood just finished fighting against the renewal of the liquor license for the Greenhouse and W.I.P. at the intersection of Varick and Vandam. It seems inappropriate and ill advised that the State Liquor Authority would even consider allowing the Martignetti Brothers into the site at King and 6th Avenue. Our local history has proven that establishments such as this are often the sites of excessive noise, alcohol and drug consumption leading to fights and attacks. In addition to disrupting the inhabitants of the neighborhood, the police are asked to address the alcohol and drug related issues flowing from these establishments. The SLA needs to consider the poor track record of operators of these establishments. The Martignetti Brother's have a proven business model of pumping their patrons full of alcohol and dumping them on the streets of any neighborhood where they are operating. If past is prologue, this is what they will do again in the space at King and 6th Avenue. The neighborhood continues to be overwhelmingly against allowing operators pursuing this business model into our spaces.