Skip to main content

No 200 houses in Brundall

430 Comments

P
Paul Murray
9 years ago

I say NO to 200 new houses in Brundall

S
Sarah Henry
9 years ago

We have a greedy fat cat agent buying the village land to sell on so that 200 houses will be built The infastrcture of our little village can't cope and why should a company from Dorset spoil our view on the field we walk our dogs and children on. If BPC can purchase the land they should be going all out to get it and BDC should support them. It's taxpayers money that they have anyway.

C
Carla Hodgson
9 years ago

I obviously did not understand the plan as I thought the major part of that field would be part of the countryside park. If that is not the case and it is to be houses, then I most cetainly do not agree with the proposal. That whole area needs to be a countryside park and leisure facilities for the village.

S
Susan Buck
9 years ago

We have not got the services to accommodate another 200 families.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

I am signing this partition as my house almost backs onto the field the proposed building of 200 houses should be. I have lived in Brundall village for the last twelve years and I think having another 200 houses to the village will put pressure on already stressed services.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

With the schools and GP already at capacity, until I see a formal plan to improve these services I strongly disagree to any further development plans in the local area.

C
claire condie
9 years ago

our doctors cant cope as it is all these extra houses will put all the resources under too much pressure

S
Sarah Henry
9 years ago

Mote gready developers taking our land to build house 'we' don't want, designating the village. But don't worry they don't have to live here.

D
David wheeler
9 years ago

After the Brexit vote there is no need for these houses

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

There is not appropriate links to the area, you can't have everyone using links avenue it would be chaos. If they are to build it makes more sense being next to the new development off cucumber lane

H
Hannah Young
10 years ago

No to building more houses in Brundall!

I
Ian Smalley
10 years ago

Don't let them ruin your beautiful village, there is plenty of brown field sites on the outskirts of Norwich crying out for development

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

I do not agree that our countryside should be ruined with more ugly housing. Leave it alone! Rejuvenate other areas like Anglia Square and the surrounding areas, not beautiful Brundall.

M
Michelle Reece
10 years ago

Brundall does not have the infrastructure to cope with a other 200 homes.

K
katherine
10 years ago

I say no to 200 more houses.

E
Emma Davey
10 years ago

We already have the pastures, we don't need any more thanks, if anyone wants to move here we already have a number of houses on sale. They also don't fit in the neighbourhood plan.

A
Anonymous
10 years ago

The junction on blofield road is dangerous enough without another road! Another 200 houses are unessecary in a small village and people want it to remain small. Plus who builds a football field on a hill??

J
Jane Davey
10 years ago

Brundall does not need these houses, the "recreation" field does not provide anything for the kids to do and the junction on Blofield Road is dangerous enough already.

L
Lynne Burrows
10 years ago

I have lived in the village for 24 years. I have seen houses squashed in everywhere it's possible. Then 150 new houses off Cucumber Lane. Note the word Lane. Getting out of the village to get to work is already a nightmare. Our 'village' is disappearing and will be totally over run with 200 new houses and the attendant cars and children needing the school and doctors. It already takes 3 to 4 weeks to get an appointment.

D
Dave Brown
10 years ago

Already the recent new buildings have shown a marked impact on traffic through the Street and any more new houses can only increase this, along with pressure on existing facilities i.e. The Doctors surgery and the school.