This was passed from under our nose. I find this to be ridiculous and a very shady unethical way to conduct business. We pay dues, our rights should matter.
T
Trevor Clements
9 years ago
This legislature would absolutely ruin how my business current operates and would cost me thousands of dollars I could not afford.
T
Tj Brisbois
9 years ago
The public learns more every day, that the BROKERAGE bears little if any role in the CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE. It's all in the agent you choose.
IN ADDITION to the miscommunication to the public , this would put an unfair burden on brokers and agents by requiring them to change their marketing pieces, signs, websites...the list goes on. If the PUBLIC, BROKERS AND AGENTS wouldn't benefit, why would this sign be useful?
A
Anonymous
9 years ago
This is a truly dumb rule.
S
Steven Radolinski
9 years ago
This bill seems to go against the individual real estate agent and promote the major companies interest...
R
Robert Lincoln Lewis
9 years ago
This law hurts me and many of my fellow agents in the field. Stop it!!
R
Reggie Ragina Vaughn
9 years ago
Please reconsider
K
KIM BUNTIN
9 years ago
This is over reaching, pointless legislation designed to clog up the system further with unneccessary laws. Shame on you. Please repeal this silliness.
M
Matt Verbaan
9 years ago
Real estate is an individual agent 1099 commission environment. This is totally again what realtors strive to be... be known by their name.... as we are responsible for their own advertising, their own marketing, their own business. . And now you try to curtail that by forcing the brand to be the focus. That's a crock. .. good and great agents have spent their own time effort and money to brand themselves to attract business and work to retain business and clients. The broker really is secondary. The back bone and the support staff. Completely unfair to agents trying to Make a name for himself. .. shame on you... shame. You all are becoming no knowing no caring hypocrites, only focused on getting yours vs what's ACTUALLY good for the worker or the state, or district, or community. Shame shame shame
R
Richard Barren
9 years ago
Would like To see the signage rule removed. I think this is a huge cost to many agents. And there a lot of agents that might not be able to have the money for this. Its going to do more harm then good. Personally think its ridiculous
T
Tommy Desmond
9 years ago
This is a pointless proposal that will have an impact on the current administration at the voting booth if it passes.
S
Sandra George
9 years ago
Speaking of truth in advertising, interesting that a Republican introduced this law for MORE regulation and less freedom. Bet that's not what he campaigned on.
A
Alex hagopian
9 years ago
I'd have to to throw out 20 signs and 10 open house signs that cost me over 1,000
T
Tracy Fitch
9 years ago
Who decided that people were confused??...oh, yes, OUR Government. Guess I am still confused as to why this is even an issue. We are going to reduce confusion buy spending more MONEY...now I totally get it! Thanks for taking care of all of us.
S
Steve Dykstra
9 years ago
Please let us use our signs to help sell homes not advertise brokers
R
Russell Moulton
9 years ago
Who is set up to make all the money from this will not be the realtor who will pay the sign makers to remake all the previously purchased signs.
J
Joe Richards
9 years ago
I would like my advertising to stay as it is. Thanks for the petition.
D
Dolores Carpenter
9 years ago
Another example of government recklessly spending get taxpayers dollars on legislation that will fix nothing and, in fact, do more harm than good.
M
MARK DOUGLAS
9 years ago
Sounds like the work of lobbyists and not the work of the people. Be swayed by the petition.
J
Jennifer Brown
9 years ago
Agents already have to give a huge portion of their check to their broker, let the agent try to make a name for themselves! How are they supposed to do that if the ad has two names of equal size, visually speaking? As a consumer, I would be confused as to who the agent is... having the brokerage (I.e. "Coldwell Banker," "Century 21," or "Name Realty" on all advertising is plenty enough information.
This was passed from under our nose. I find this to be ridiculous and a very shady unethical way to conduct business. We pay dues, our rights should matter.
This legislature would absolutely ruin how my business current operates and would cost me thousands of dollars I could not afford.
The public learns more every day, that the BROKERAGE bears little if any role in the CUSTOMER EXPERIENCE. It's all in the agent you choose. IN ADDITION to the miscommunication to the public , this would put an unfair burden on brokers and agents by requiring them to change their marketing pieces, signs, websites...the list goes on. If the PUBLIC, BROKERS AND AGENTS wouldn't benefit, why would this sign be useful?
This is a truly dumb rule.
This bill seems to go against the individual real estate agent and promote the major companies interest...
This law hurts me and many of my fellow agents in the field. Stop it!!
Please reconsider
This is over reaching, pointless legislation designed to clog up the system further with unneccessary laws. Shame on you. Please repeal this silliness.
Real estate is an individual agent 1099 commission environment. This is totally again what realtors strive to be... be known by their name.... as we are responsible for their own advertising, their own marketing, their own business. . And now you try to curtail that by forcing the brand to be the focus. That's a crock. .. good and great agents have spent their own time effort and money to brand themselves to attract business and work to retain business and clients. The broker really is secondary. The back bone and the support staff. Completely unfair to agents trying to Make a name for himself. .. shame on you... shame. You all are becoming no knowing no caring hypocrites, only focused on getting yours vs what's ACTUALLY good for the worker or the state, or district, or community. Shame shame shame
Would like To see the signage rule removed. I think this is a huge cost to many agents. And there a lot of agents that might not be able to have the money for this. Its going to do more harm then good. Personally think its ridiculous
This is a pointless proposal that will have an impact on the current administration at the voting booth if it passes.
Speaking of truth in advertising, interesting that a Republican introduced this law for MORE regulation and less freedom. Bet that's not what he campaigned on.
I'd have to to throw out 20 signs and 10 open house signs that cost me over 1,000
Who decided that people were confused??...oh, yes, OUR Government. Guess I am still confused as to why this is even an issue. We are going to reduce confusion buy spending more MONEY...now I totally get it! Thanks for taking care of all of us.
Please let us use our signs to help sell homes not advertise brokers
Who is set up to make all the money from this will not be the realtor who will pay the sign makers to remake all the previously purchased signs.
I would like my advertising to stay as it is. Thanks for the petition.
Another example of government recklessly spending get taxpayers dollars on legislation that will fix nothing and, in fact, do more harm than good.
Sounds like the work of lobbyists and not the work of the people. Be swayed by the petition.
Agents already have to give a huge portion of their check to their broker, let the agent try to make a name for themselves! How are they supposed to do that if the ad has two names of equal size, visually speaking? As a consumer, I would be confused as to who the agent is... having the brokerage (I.e. "Coldwell Banker," "Century 21," or "Name Realty" on all advertising is plenty enough information.