Skip to main content

New Canaan Start Times - Sleep Equity for All Children

104 Comments

N
Nadiya Pivtorak
5 years ago

I am strongly opposed to starting elementary school at the proposed time of 7:45.

L
Laura Sousa
5 years ago

This time change would be incredibly detrimental to working parents and the sleep schedules of younger children.

E
Emily Raderman
5 years ago

This change would be a massive blow to dual-income working families both moving to and who already reside in New Canaan. As a working mother, I can't say that it would make sense to live in New Canaan if the trade off for amazing public school education is my children not having time with either parent during the week. Please do not make this change it would be devastating for both children's and parent's mental and physical health.

T
Tanjina Quazi
5 years ago

We honestly need to put our children first.

A
Anonymous
5 years ago

Please do not adopt this proposal. In order to "help" the high school students you are creating a great deal of difficulty at all other grade levels. The proposed start time of 9:15 for grades 5/6 is absurd. Students will have not enough time for homework, afterschool activities, friends and family time. Additionally these students are still young enough to require both before and after school care for dual income families which is an enormous burden. The new block schedule at the HS I think remedies some of the sleep concerns. I don't know a single HS student who supports this change.

D
Deborah Catalano
6 years ago

The start times today, are balanced for working families, younger students and HS students with sports and extracurricular activities. The earlier start times are appropriate for the HS age group as they embark on adulthood and get on a schedule in line with having a career while still allowing them to have homework time with sports/activities. It does not make sense to put the early start times on young children who can be so affected by lack of sleep, lack of quality time with parents and attentiveness issues in the later afternoon. The negative impact on students, parents, teachers, the budget, and the RE market in New Canaan make it hard to understand why the BOE would even consider this change. The students, parents and teachers have raised their voices to keep start times the same, why is no one listening to the people this will affect? And to those saying unplug technology, that will make the earlier start times work for small children, you clearly don't have a touch on reality or understand the heart of why this change is opposed.

L
Lisa Wu
6 years ago

Against time change.

J
Jim healey
6 years ago

I do not approve any new changes.

R
Robert Young
6 years ago

Many talk about having moved to New Canaan because of the schools. It seems the private school community is thriving in NC, thus giving folks a choice. One cannot look at start times alone. One must look at the cost and an extra $1MM spent on buses seems ridiculous in a cost conscious environment to say nothing about $500k for a planetarium. Have a visit to the Hayden Planetarium for such needs

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

Do we care about our teachers? These start times will greatly affect our teachers and may even cause them to look elsewhere! All around not a good idea for everyone!!

B
Brian Duran
6 years ago

This shouldn’t be a choice to begin with. Please don’t attempt to solve one problem by creating another.

P
Peter Dooney
6 years ago

As a working parent I will probably see my children max 20 minutes per day when they are in elementary school, if that, under the current proposed plan. And I only work in Greenwich. Many who commute on the train will not see their children during the week at all, unless they are kept up late and sacrifice sleep. A proposal regarding increased sleep for some students can not come at the cost of young students seeing their parents. In households where two parents commute, children could literally be parentless all week.

M
Missy Dooney
6 years ago

I strongly disagree with the 7:45 am start time for elementary children for a variety of reasons, including lack of sleep vs. sacrificing seeing working parents, the disparate impact on dual earner families, single parents, or anyone who cannot afford extra childcare, the zig-zag effect of earlier then later than earlier then later times which makes it even harder for families to plan, unintended consequences of having later grades start significantly later, property values impacted if we cannot attract young families, etc. etc. etc. Exhausted elementary students are not going to yield happy productive prepared middle and high school students.

K
Krista
6 years ago

School start times should stay the same.

J
Justin Warshowsky
6 years ago

I'd be embarrassed to be a board member of anything that places the burden of solving for a high schooler at the feet of a five year old.

G
Gretchen Russell
6 years ago

District survey shows: 94% of HS teachers don’t want start time change, 64% of HS students don’t want start time change and the majority of parents support the current schedule. Keep start times the same — we have a high-performing district already and this isn’t the time, on the verge of a possible recession, to increase the BOE budget $1MM in perpetuity.

G
Gretchen Russell
6 years ago

District survey shows: 94% of HS teachers don’t want start time change, 64% of HS students don’t want start time change, and majority of parents support the current schedule. Keep start times the same — we already have a high performing district and this is not the right time, on the verge of a possible recession, to increase the BOE budget $1 MM in perpetuity.

A
Anonymous
6 years ago

I strongly dislike the change

U
Unity Lee
6 years ago

I think we should stay with the regular start times, if we have an extra hour with this start time we’re just gonna go to sleep later

M
Matt Delmazio
6 years ago

745 start time for children is unacceptable.