Skip to main content

The Board confirmed they are moving forward with this inclusive appointment despite the noise. It feels like a long road finally coming to an end. Keep your eyes open to ensure this spirit of discourse remains a priority for the university moving forward.

September 1, 2014

Maintain Diverse Viewpoints on Notre Dame's Board

Maintain Diverse Viewpoints on Notre Dame's Board

🏆 Won — 342 supporters Verified

Final supporters

J
Jessica J.
M
Margaret B.
S
Someone
S
Serena m.
J
Jeanine S.
D
Diana G.
M
Milton M.
J
James M.
M
m.collins
B
Bridget H.
+332 more
KP
Started by Katherine Peralta 12 years, 3 months ago

We, the Notre Dame family, support the inclusion of diverse schools of thought and opinion on the Board of Trustees, the University’s ultimate governing body. We urge the Board to recall that Notre Dame welcomes scholarly discourse even if it disagrees with any one participant’s personal values. University leadership should therefore reflect this inclusive spirit.


Last month Katie Washington was selected to fill one of two designated seats for recent graduates on the Board, and we fully support her appointment. Washington, a Gary, Indiana native, was the 2010 valedictorian and studied Biology and Catholic Social Teaching. As an undergraduate, she also conducted research on lung cancer, studied infectious disease at the Eck Institute on Global Health and directed the Notre Dame Voices of Faith Gospel Choir. She is now an M.D./Ph.D. candidate at Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore.


Washington has publicly expressed support for universal access to contraceptives. In a 2012 opinion letter to the Baltimore Sun, to which she contributed with nine other Johns Hopkins medical students, Washington defended access to birth control and other preventive measures as a basic human right.


Through Washington’s appointment, the University is in no way espousing her convictions – though medically based – nor is it compromising its own sincerity in its efforts to seek exemption from the Health and Human Services’ mandate to provide contraceptives to all employees.


Notre Dame is first and foremost an institution of higher learning, and as such, seeks to provide an open forum for constructive dialogue and first-rate scholarship.


University President John Jenkins gave the same justification when defending the decision to have President Barack Obama deliver the commencement address to the Class of 2009. Said Jenkins:


“President Obama has come to Notre Dame, though he knows well that we are fully supportive of Church teaching on the sanctity of human life, and we oppose his policies on abortion and embryonic stem cell research. Others might have avoided this venue for that reason. But President Obama is not someone who stops talking to those who differ with him. Mr. President: This is a principle we share.”


Expressing opinions than don’t squarely align with Humanae Vitae doesn’t make one anti-Catholic, but failure to welcome differing viewpoints on any issue is certainly against everything for which higher education stands.


It is for moments like these that Father Theodore Hesburgh advocated so strongly to transition the University's board to a one composed of laymen and laywomen, and even called it “the greatest change made” during his 35 years of presidency at Notre Dame.


““[T]he Catholic university must be a crossroads where all the intellectual and moral currents of our times meet and are thoughtfully considered,” Hesburgh wrote in his 1994 book, “The Challenge and Promise of a Catholic University.”


In his commencement address to Harvard University last month, Michael Bloomberg – after whom was named the school of public health where Washington is pursuing her doctorate – echoed a similar sentiment as he decried partisanship of any sort in America’s universities.


“The role of universities is not to promote an ideology. It is to provide scholars and students with a neutral forum for researching and debating issues – without tipping the scales in one direction, or repressing unpopular views.


University leadership must underscore Notre Dame’s mission to provide discourse in which “the various lines of Catholic thought may intersect with all the forms of knowledge found in the arts, sciences, professions, and every other area of human scholarship and creativity.”


Washington, who matriculated through the premier Catholic University in the country to go on to one of the top research institutions in the world, embodies this goal, and we insist that her appointment to the Board be maintained.

Updates

Reached 250 supporters

July 30, 2014

Reached 100 supporters

June 10, 2014

June 7, 2014

The climb toward one hundred names is exhausting but necessary if we want the board to acknowledge our position. We need a final push to cross this mark before we take our concerns to the leadership.

58 Comments

L
Levi Checketts
12 years ago Featured

Nothing is less Catholic than silencing diverse voices. Even when saints are canonized, someone plays the part of "devil's advocate" to make the strongest case against the beatified person as possible. Disagreeing with a highly controversial piece of Magisterial teaching (never received by the faithful, I might add) does not make one anti-Catholic.

M
Max Walters
12 years ago Featured

(ND '05) How would the Board of Trustees, or ND community, be served by expelling Ms. Washington from the Board? Her viewpoints are informed by both a background of Catholic social teaching and a respectable degree of experience for someone her age. Unless there's some glaring aspect I'm missing, the need for this petition does not reflect well upon our spirit of Catholic scholarship.

A
Anonymous
12 years ago Featured

It would be a shame not to include alumni involved with the delivery of healthcare in a discussion about healthcare. Don't just preach diversity and inclusion, practice it!

A
Alicia Lachiondo
12 years ago Featured

We have allowed other bright, dedicated men and women to occupy leadership positions at this university despite public views outside of Catholic Teaching (see: Condoleeza Rice).

A
Alicia D'Alessandro
12 years ago Featured

I am proud to have Katie represent me on the Board of Trustees and it would be a disgrace to our alma mater if she is removed for her stance on this issue. The University I attended promoted thoughtfulness and tolerance for dissenting points of view and should continue to do so. If it only wants to support blind adherence to Catholic doctrine, it might as well shut down every school besides the seminary.

R
Riyath Mallahi
12 years ago Featured

Intellectual diversity is the hallmark of a liberal arts education. None are more qualified for this role than Katie Washington. To rob the board of a candidate of Katie's caliber as well as the unique voice she brings would violate the spirit of excellence the University strives for.

J
Jeanine Sterling '76
11 years ago

Well, if we're going to impose religious litmus tests on the Trustees, then I believe only those who have never used artificial birth control are allowed to remain in their positions. It's Catholic teaching after all. Let's see who's left.

J
Jeanine Sterling '76
11 years ago

How many Board of Trustees members (or their partners) have used artificial birth control? All of them, I bet. Well, that goes directly against Catholic teaching, so maybe the entire Board should be disbanded? Stop imposing these religious litmus tests. Not everyone needs to agree with every aspect of the Roman Catholic religion in order to faithfully and fully serve a great university like Notre Dame. For heaven's sake, the teachings seem to change daily anyway, depending upon what Pope is in charge.