Skip to main content

LVR ADVOCATES FOR TRANSPARENCY

150 Comments

L
Linda M Stewart
1 year ago

This is not due process and is being forced on membership.

T
Ted Finkleman
1 year ago

Didn’t like the President’s condescension and disingenuous remarks. Can we create a petition to impeach GK?

A
Anonymous
1 year ago

After the last disaster of an election, this seems like another attempt to manipulate the membership.

J
Joseph Opatik
1 year ago

No on any changes to the bylaws

V
Virendra Pal
1 year ago

I oppose any and all changes

C
Carla Ratliff
1 year ago

I oppose all changes. I strongly oppose any proxy votes.

D
Debby Novak
1 year ago

Why the rush? Sure seems like a power grab that does not serve the body of LVR members.

R
Rhonda Osiecki-Gurr
1 year ago

I vote NO !!!

W
WAYNE LAUTENSLAGER
1 year ago

Voting no for all 9 motions

C
CONSUELO C SNEVE
1 year ago

NO CHANGES WHATSOEVER

M
mildrey rojas
1 year ago

Estoy de acuerdo con tu petición

J
Joshua Campa
1 year ago

LVR is a membership based Association. It is clear it's members have rejected these changes and the way they were rolled out. Take the changes back to the Bylaws Committee, allow the membership to participate and provide input. Whether the changes are positive or not has been overshadowed by a botched roll-out just days in advance of the LVR Election timeline that the members do not support. The longer this goes on the more it hurts our Membership, our Industry, and Public Image to the Consumer.

K
Keith Kaminsky
1 year ago

Why change anything? There hasn't been a public outcry for these changes. Something smells fishy.

M
Mark E Rowley
1 year ago

PID - 229830 - I would like the Board of Directors to formally state that there will not be a sale of the MLS to an outside third-party as has been done in Colorado....REcolorado sold to MAZL, LLC whose sole member is Joseph E. Burks who is the President of Equity Title and also an association member...The Transaction has been done with a "NON-DISCLOSURE" agreement to hide the price and funding of the transaction.....Why is the board shrinking..?...Our MLS is wholly owned by LVR and who would vote on a sale would be the Board Members of LVR....

M
Michael J Salisbury
1 year ago

This appears to be a blatant attempt to take over the LVR. Curious that it occurs now. I wonder who is backing them? Follow the money!!!

M
Melanie McDowell
1 year ago

I think this has been rushed and would like more clarification!

R
Russ Arnold
1 year ago

The board and leadership need to slow down and listen. Seems pretty clear that the membership is in support of accountability, transparency, and the rightful representation of the members. Members are NOT in support of rushing changes that impact us all with little to no discussion or member input on the issues.

S
Sheri Holthaus
1 year ago

I appose all 9 motions and urge our board members to vote “no”.

K
Karol Lucan
1 year ago

I'm very concerned about the bylaw revisions that are being proposed. I believe the membership has a voice that needs to be heard! Restricting decisions to a handful of people is unacceptable. I oppose the changes and the meeting for these changes.

R
Rena Levy
1 year ago

Say NO to Unnecessary Bylaws Changes Vote NO to Protect Our Association! I urge you to VOTE NO on these unnecessary and risky changes. This is our chance to speak up and protect the integrity of our Association.