Skip to main content

Logan Homes Conditional Zoning Application

228 Comments

M
Mila Millman
2 years ago

Overdevelopment, clear cutting, lack of necessary infrastructure and overpopulation, destroy the area's unique habitat for many protected species, as well as significantly worsen quality of life of the existing residents. Strongly oppose.

S
Smith Elizabeth
2 years ago

The proposed plan is unconscionable. The area cannot sustain that many new homes without massive road and utility improvement.

D
Don Whitfield II
2 years ago

Pure stupidity and greed. Will ruin Sunset beach and turn our traffic into another DC.

P
Pam Doute
2 years ago

Absolutely ridiculous to propose 1 entrance to this small city going in - not to mention the light pollution. Parse it way down - save some of the current trees - create an environment people want to live in

C
Cynthia Dillon
2 years ago

In addition to concerns about infrastructure that is woefully in need of updating to accommodate the residential and business growth already underway, we have a substantial amount of vacant commercial spaces existing. This type of community plan submission feels a lot like a bait and switch. The Council needs to ensure they don’t allow these types of ‘after the fact’ requests to keep future developers from attempting the same manipulation.

M
Melanie Carballo
2 years ago

We are opposed to the proposed plans. Stop overdevelopment in Brunswick County!!

J
James Reny
2 years ago

Not good for this area. Route 904 can’t sustain that amount of traffic.

T
Tod Hildebrand
2 years ago

Nice work folks.

D
Denise Reny
2 years ago

Too large for this area. Highway 904 will be a nightmare. Noise, pollution etc.

S
Shelley Hamon
2 years ago

This development is wrong. Too much too fast without any consideration for our community.

A
Amy Cain Tarr
2 years ago

Thank you

L
Linda Eastman
2 years ago

There are multiple issyes of concern. Ssfety is a big concern. There is onle one access & eggress onto 904/179.

L
Linda Rudick
2 years ago

Why the request for a change? The original lot size of 7500 sf is large enough. Lots enforce some restrictions on traffic, sewer, electric.

M
Mary Mitchell
2 years ago

We do not have the infrastructure to allow this

C
Charles Yow
2 years ago

Sea Trail home owner

T
Thomas Young
2 years ago

No to this proposal.

G
Gina Young
2 years ago

This scope of this overblown project needs to be severely limited.

A
Amanda Schaper
2 years ago

Has the developer proved that current infrastructure can support this?

J
John B Rooney
2 years ago

Please stop this travesty...the infrastructure is already severely challenged. Please do the right thing in controlling this one. Thank you.

S
Shelley Allen
2 years ago

We need smart growth, consideration of infrastructure & the environment, and impact fees for developers. We're getting none of those things thanks to our current office-holders who seem to have little regard for their constituents' needs. It seems the only way to get their attention will be to vote them out in November. Otherwise, we'll continue to get more of the same.