Skip to main content

Local Centre Overstone Leys

110 Comments

L
Linda Hardwick
4 years ago

No more developments, where is our village!

E
Elaine Hall
4 years ago

Why another petrol station and shop? There are already both in this area .

C
Chris Startup
4 years ago

I object

A
Anonymous
4 years ago

The entry into and out if the village of Overstone will be chaotic. The noise we hear already has increased tremendously with the new road. There is no need for these establishments and they are different to the original plans submitted. Overstone village has now become an extension of urban Northampton and non of these changes impact on Daventry who are giving the go ahead.

P
Philip Nauroth
4 years ago

more green fields spoilt

J
Julia Trusler
4 years ago

Stop the building

J
Jeni
4 years ago

Just too much!

W
Wendy Hill
4 years ago

Enough is enough

K
Kay Giles
4 years ago

Disgusting planning application, we are a rural area and don't need fast food outlets lighting up our sky.

A
Anonymous
4 years ago

There is enough buildings going up in this area. Please save our green spaces

L
Lucy redden
4 years ago

I object to the hybrid Planning Application WND/2021/0860. We do not need the food places, another petrol garage and more nurseries, we are not the town centre. You are ruining the countryside village

K
Kerry
4 years ago Featured

I object to this application having lived in the village for over 20 years I am saddened that it is being destroyed with the amount of traffic cutting through the villages over the last year increasing pollution, accidents and loss of our beautiful trees and countryside.

A
Alan Carter
4 years ago

I object on the grounds of increased risk of road traffic accidents, in reased pollution and introducing unhealthy eating and rubbish into the area

B
Breda Carter
4 years ago

Object on grounds if road safety, pollution, social health and wellbeing and increasing the number of vehicles using the villages as a cut through

A
Anonymous
4 years ago

Sywell, Overstone and Moulton do not need the proposed site development. It will be bad for the local area by increasing traffic congestion, noise, pollution and providing nothing but chaos on busy days.

J
Janet Perks
4 years ago

Totally against.

K
Kathryn Hamilton
4 years ago

Against extension of the plans and drive through food outlets. This is a village location and whilst addition amenities are needed, we’ve riverside only 5mins drive to fulfil any additional retail needs.

M
monica tebbutt
4 years ago

I object to the application on the following grounds: There is already a service station on that round about. PHE recommends fast food outlets should be banned near schools Site access is congested and too near to the junction, there will be accidents and fatalities. The facilities proposed to not meet the community needs of additional services such as doctors and dentists. The fast food and fuel to go is just a service to transient motorists along the A43. There is no need for additional facilities for motorists when Weston Favell is a couple of miles away Environmental Impact - there is already a loss of natural habitat for indigenous species and fauna and flora is being decimated, light pollution and air pollution will increase having a detrimental impact on health. I vehemently object

M
Machelle Franklin
4 years ago

I object to the building of a garage opposite the Aldi store at Moulton as there is already a garage also the extra land taken at the side of the road that had been planted with trees

D
Dawn Broughton
4 years ago

PHE recommends that fast food outlets should be banned near schools. There is also no need for a 2nd fuel station on the development