when will our greenbelt be left alone for people to enjoy the nature and beauty of the site.
M
Margaret Burke
10 years ago
There are many brownfield eyesores in Macclesfield that should be developed be fore any more greenfield sites are exploited
A
Alan Reid
12 years ago
This application should be refused due to negative impact on local wildlife and a amenity used by large number of local people who wish to walk dogs and take toddlrs to see local wildlife ,swans etc in particular need to be protected
C
Christopher McMillan
12 years ago
stop destroying the beauty of the world
J
Jack Bennett
12 years ago
leave it well alone it was there before us lot
D
Dave Buxton
12 years ago
I do not believe that there are any demonstrable exceptional circumstances why there should be any green belt changes to the land surrounding the site of the present Kings School site on Fence Avenue.
J
Jonathan Chapman
12 years ago
I am opposed to development here.
R
Richard Doncom
12 years ago
The Local Plan omits the fact that at the northern boundary of this site there is a Nature Conservation Priority Area, where there are active badger setts. Moreover, there are active badger setts within the proposed development site, again unmentioned. The passing reference to the Macclesfield Canal Consevation Area (MCCA) being 'parallel to the eastern boundary of the site' ignores the fact that the southern boundary lies entirely within it, and it is an area of enhanced status, being Character Area 5 of the MCCA, where the views over these fields is specifically highlighted.
A
Anonymous
12 years ago
Green belts were created specifically to prevent this sort of development
B
Beryl Houghton
12 years ago
In view of the many available brownfield sites this cannot be justified.
S
Seth Stahl
12 years ago
No no no, no!
L
Leila jacklin
12 years ago
Please save this place.
S
sarah Bednall
12 years ago
Macclesfield is lovely place, but it going down hill. most of the shop closed down mill street, because of the high rent on them. And now this. please save.
M
marie stephenson
12 years ago
it would be desacration tospoil what is essentional Macclesfield .it is so important to maintain the views of hills anddales .It is Macclesfields soul. There are enough brownfield sites to meet Macclesfields need for housing .
P
Paul Clayton
12 years ago
The proposal goes against Government Policy on Greenbelt.The area is in 2 conservation areas. There is more than enough Brownfield sites in Macclesfield,which need clearing up for the benefit of the town. Kings school have more than enough land to sell at their Sports facilities next next to Prestbury. Leave LEFA alone.
M
Michael Dale
12 years ago
There is no need for such intense housing especially when brown field sites are being overlooked and green sites are being destroyed.
P
Pamela Atkinson
12 years ago
There are enough brownfield sites for the required housing units without using this green belt land.
V
Vivienne Lancaster
12 years ago
There are so many brown field sites in Macclesfield and leave our green belt alone.
B
Basil Jeuda
12 years ago
lleave the green belt for future generations
A
Angela and John Smith
12 years ago
There are more enough brown field dites for building without encroaching on precious green belt.
when will our greenbelt be left alone for people to enjoy the nature and beauty of the site.
There are many brownfield eyesores in Macclesfield that should be developed be fore any more greenfield sites are exploited
This application should be refused due to negative impact on local wildlife and a amenity used by large number of local people who wish to walk dogs and take toddlrs to see local wildlife ,swans etc in particular need to be protected
stop destroying the beauty of the world
leave it well alone it was there before us lot
I do not believe that there are any demonstrable exceptional circumstances why there should be any green belt changes to the land surrounding the site of the present Kings School site on Fence Avenue.
I am opposed to development here.
The Local Plan omits the fact that at the northern boundary of this site there is a Nature Conservation Priority Area, where there are active badger setts. Moreover, there are active badger setts within the proposed development site, again unmentioned. The passing reference to the Macclesfield Canal Consevation Area (MCCA) being 'parallel to the eastern boundary of the site' ignores the fact that the southern boundary lies entirely within it, and it is an area of enhanced status, being Character Area 5 of the MCCA, where the views over these fields is specifically highlighted.
Green belts were created specifically to prevent this sort of development
In view of the many available brownfield sites this cannot be justified.
No no no, no!
Please save this place.
Macclesfield is lovely place, but it going down hill. most of the shop closed down mill street, because of the high rent on them. And now this. please save.
it would be desacration tospoil what is essentional Macclesfield .it is so important to maintain the views of hills anddales .It is Macclesfields soul. There are enough brownfield sites to meet Macclesfields need for housing .
The proposal goes against Government Policy on Greenbelt.The area is in 2 conservation areas. There is more than enough Brownfield sites in Macclesfield,which need clearing up for the benefit of the town. Kings school have more than enough land to sell at their Sports facilities next next to Prestbury. Leave LEFA alone.
There is no need for such intense housing especially when brown field sites are being overlooked and green sites are being destroyed.
There are enough brownfield sites for the required housing units without using this green belt land.
There are so many brown field sites in Macclesfield and leave our green belt alone.
lleave the green belt for future generations
There are more enough brown field dites for building without encroaching on precious green belt.