Skip to main content

Sign Petition Now - Oppose Bubble Domes @ Birch Tennis Club aka Dent Tennis Academy

136 Comments

P
Paula Nicholson
9 years ago Featured

Oppose bubble domes. Keller is not responsible for their financing shortfall, but Keller is responsible for adherence to guidelines and precedents set for future development.

S
Shelly Waddell
9 years ago

No to domes!

G
Gabriel E Di Carlo
9 years ago

Terrible Idea

C
Chad Truby
9 years ago

Horrible idea for a residential community.

D
Dena Meek
9 years ago

NO

P
Peggy Lane
9 years ago

NO TO BUBBLE DOMES

A
Anastasia Schuman
9 years ago

I do not approve of the bubble domes.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

NO to bubble dome!!

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

No to the bubble domes. Any financing issue the owner has should not result in exceptions. Please don't allow this kind of underhanded business practice to continue.

C
Charlie Holmes
9 years ago

NO DOMES! THIS AIN'T CALIFORNIA!!!

C
Celeste Davis
9 years ago

No to Bubble Domes - No to Commercial businesses on Residential Zoned Property. Follow City Codes, Future Land Use Maps and The Master Plan.

J
Jana Z Reed
9 years ago

I would NOT want these in my backyard or in viewing distance from enjoying my backyard, therefore I am supporting my fellow neighbors!!! No domes!

L
Lisa Gillespie
9 years ago

We just moved here from out of state and chose Keller, Texas because of its beautiful community and family atmosphere. Yes to tennis but no to domes! Let's do it right and continue adding structures that add not detract from our beautiful city.

A
Anonymous
9 years ago

Enclose them properly - no domes

D
Donna J Bierd
9 years ago

We say NO to the Dome in our residential area of Keller.

D
Dan and Stephanie Harp
9 years ago

We feel that the variance to relax the aesthetic building codes for the short term satisfaction of a less than desirable addition of bubble domes is a mistake not only for the surrounding neighborhood, but, will prove to be a costly mistake by the city council insofar as it relates to future building projects and expected favors to would be builders and developers with last minute "additions" or caveats. In addition to the building of these monstrosities, as taxpayers we feel future litigation and damages to potential victims due to the failure of these structures under severe weather circumstances far outweighs whatever short term gain accrued by cutting corners just to please a needy developer. Lastly, we believe future political aspirations of mayor and council members in favor of this boondoggle will be negatively affected beyond repair, in effect bringing them to a certain end.

C
Cheney de Groot
9 years ago

Opposed, no value in it

L
Lisa Escaloni
9 years ago

I am troubled by the city granting so many variances to this project over the objections of their immediate neighbors. The domes are the last straw and should NOT be allowed in our city. If the property owner wants to enclose the tennis courts he should do so with a permanent structure that conforms to city code, much the same way that we homeowners have to make additions bricked and fit into the neighborhood. These fabric domes clearly do not.

M
Marco Amaya
9 years ago

Not attractive in residential area. If somehow they were surrounded by large trees and not viewable from the road/highway, I would be accepting of this.

S
Sue Wilson
9 years ago

After review of domes on utube we do not support this monster going up.