Developers use timeshares so they won't have to contribute to schools. Also timeshares don't count toward the city build out requirements. Good for all except the citizens that live here.
No timeshares by the lagoon
S
steve commins
10 years ago
a time share complex is not an appropriate addition to this neighborhood and would not fit the current character of the area
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
No time shares! There are enough places for visitors to stay. The lagoon is already too crowded.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
No more building.
P
Penny Johnson
10 years ago
Stop the madness that this city council and planning commission keep trying to shove on us!!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Just say NO!
T
T Brown
10 years ago
To ensure the preservation of the lagoon, we do not support further building and development on and surrounding tghe Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
Let's work together to keep Carlsbad clean and preserved.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
No condos on the lagoon
L
Linda seymour
10 years ago
No timeshares on this lagoon
L
Linda Farnsworth
10 years ago
Unlike a single homeowner,time share developments bring in de-facto "renters" with no sense of ownership and stewardship of Carlsbad's natural resources. Out of town tourists already leave too much impact in the form of trash left on these lagoon beaches and crowding street parking. This is a sensitive environment that needs to be protected.
J
Jaime Kessinger
10 years ago
The lagoon is already over crowded during peak season as it is.
K
Kristine Wright
10 years ago
I agree that we do not need time share units on our lagoon.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
I agree
T
Tamara De Santi
10 years ago
Keep our water is clean!
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
As a long time employee of the carlsbad lagoon I've spent much time on Adams st. driving to and from work. Ive already had many close calls on this road as there are many blind turns and no sidewalks for pedestrians or cyclist.
I feel safer driving on the 5 fwy then i do driving on Adams st. These timeshares will bring unfamiliar drivers in to a an already precarious situation. "Adams st. belongs to the joggers and cyclist of carlsbad". keep our streets safe and traffic low. All i see is bad news when i think of these time shares.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
North Coastal San Diego has seen an a much higher percentage rate of high density housing than any other southern calif. area. Enough! We need to vote out any council members who continue to vote for this kind of growth.
A
Anonymous
10 years ago
This would be detrimental to the family neighborhood.
S
Steven Bandich
11 years ago
The addition of 20 timeshare units with associated docks and water access, in a very confined and con jested area of the Lagoon, will certainly add to the potential for safety and loss of enjoyment issues.
J
Janis Bandich
11 years ago
I agree that a timeshare on the Lagoon would add severe impact to the ecology of the environment and add many more to an overcrowded use of limited resources and supervision, which will lead to escalating many safety issues that already exist and are not being dealt with currently.
Developers use timeshares so they won't have to contribute to schools. Also timeshares don't count toward the city build out requirements. Good for all except the citizens that live here. No timeshares by the lagoon
a time share complex is not an appropriate addition to this neighborhood and would not fit the current character of the area
No time shares! There are enough places for visitors to stay. The lagoon is already too crowded.
No more building.
Stop the madness that this city council and planning commission keep trying to shove on us!!
Just say NO!
To ensure the preservation of the lagoon, we do not support further building and development on and surrounding tghe Agua Hedionda Lagoon.
Let's work together to keep Carlsbad clean and preserved.
No condos on the lagoon
No timeshares on this lagoon
Unlike a single homeowner,time share developments bring in de-facto "renters" with no sense of ownership and stewardship of Carlsbad's natural resources. Out of town tourists already leave too much impact in the form of trash left on these lagoon beaches and crowding street parking. This is a sensitive environment that needs to be protected.
The lagoon is already over crowded during peak season as it is.
I agree that we do not need time share units on our lagoon.
I agree
Keep our water is clean!
As a long time employee of the carlsbad lagoon I've spent much time on Adams st. driving to and from work. Ive already had many close calls on this road as there are many blind turns and no sidewalks for pedestrians or cyclist. I feel safer driving on the 5 fwy then i do driving on Adams st. These timeshares will bring unfamiliar drivers in to a an already precarious situation. "Adams st. belongs to the joggers and cyclist of carlsbad". keep our streets safe and traffic low. All i see is bad news when i think of these time shares.
North Coastal San Diego has seen an a much higher percentage rate of high density housing than any other southern calif. area. Enough! We need to vote out any council members who continue to vote for this kind of growth.
This would be detrimental to the family neighborhood.
The addition of 20 timeshare units with associated docks and water access, in a very confined and con jested area of the Lagoon, will certainly add to the potential for safety and loss of enjoyment issues.
I agree that a timeshare on the Lagoon would add severe impact to the ecology of the environment and add many more to an overcrowded use of limited resources and supervision, which will lead to escalating many safety issues that already exist and are not being dealt with currently.