The Islamic way of slaughtering is more merciful to the chicken, lamb etc. than stunning, the meat is healthier as it has less distress hormones in it. Lots of mon Muslims buy halal meat as they prefer it. leave the law as it is and stop finding excuses to make life for Muslims difficult
A
abid hussain
12 years ago
no to stun
T
Tahir Saddiq
12 years ago
Religous slaughter without stunning should be protected by law.
K
Khadim Hussain
12 years ago
PetitionforHalal Assurance Scheme We ask the Government to ensure that existing legislation surrounding religious slaughter continues to be protected and is not abused by vested interests by ensuring: 1.That in Law the definition of Halal is protected in a similar way to the term Shechita where the legislation makes it clear that religious slaughter is without stunning. 2.That the government puts the interest of the rights of the Muslim consumer, as protected by law, over and beyond the vested interest of the profit driven supplier.
I
I hussain
12 years ago
I support the halal meat not to be stunned before slaughtered. Please respect our religion and our religious beliefs. Thank you
R
railu
12 years ago
I ask the Government to ensure that existing legislation surrounding religious slaughter continues to be protected and is not abused by vested interests.
the practice of stunning animals is a greater sign of cruelty to animals. many animals die from the immense pain and should not be subject to this AT ALL.
A
Asif Ahmed
12 years ago
don't change the rules
A
Abdulsufan
12 years ago
Needs sorting
K
K Butt
12 years ago
I ask that my religious beliefs be respected.
F
Faraz Ahmad
12 years ago
Studies have shown halal slaughter is more humane to the animal. Stunning is clearly not the islamic method. Everyone has the right to choose their own food based on method of slaughter.
A
A.Omar
12 years ago
please allow the halal methods used now & not by stunning the animal.
Halal meat non-stunned should be readily available as that is more halal than stunned meat
[email protected]
I do not support chickens being stuned
The Islamic way of slaughtering is more merciful to the chicken, lamb etc. than stunning, the meat is healthier as it has less distress hormones in it. Lots of mon Muslims buy halal meat as they prefer it. leave the law as it is and stop finding excuses to make life for Muslims difficult
no to stun
Religous slaughter without stunning should be protected by law.
PetitionforHalal Assurance Scheme We ask the Government to ensure that existing legislation surrounding religious slaughter continues to be protected and is not abused by vested interests by ensuring: 1.That in Law the definition of Halal is protected in a similar way to the term Shechita where the legislation makes it clear that religious slaughter is without stunning. 2.That the government puts the interest of the rights of the Muslim consumer, as protected by law, over and beyond the vested interest of the profit driven supplier.
I support the halal meat not to be stunned before slaughtered. Please respect our religion and our religious beliefs. Thank you
I ask the Government to ensure that existing legislation surrounding religious slaughter continues to be protected and is not abused by vested interests.
[email protected]
i support nonstuned halal meat
the practice of stunning animals is a greater sign of cruelty to animals. many animals die from the immense pain and should not be subject to this AT ALL.
don't change the rules
Needs sorting
I ask that my religious beliefs be respected.
Studies have shown halal slaughter is more humane to the animal. Stunning is clearly not the islamic method. Everyone has the right to choose their own food based on method of slaughter.
please allow the halal methods used now & not by stunning the animal.
Keep it halal
stunning is not halah
we do not stunned chickens..