I am for a study of the current dues assessment as it is currently being administered towards a better fairness and equality with our membership. I favor an umbrella baseline dues rate which covers the IATSE per capita, paid at the beginning of the budgetary year. This will cover yearly membership for all to remain in good standing. If you work during any of the four quarters you would pay only a dues rate tied to a percentage of the earnings based on the scale rate of the contract with which you are working under at the time. The percentage rate will be deducted from your paycheck at the time it is earned by the payroll company and deposited with the Union. If you make an overscale rate, no percentage will be taken from the overscale as I see it as a bonus for perhaps your talent , years of experience, ongoing relationships with the company, etc. In the long run, Yes, let us study and come to the table with a framework that works for the equity of all members and with promotes growth within our guild.
A
Adolfo Martinez Perez
11 years ago
Percentage, no cap (the cap lowers the percentage of the highest earners: the opposite of fair; it defeats the point of making it percentage based)
A
Adolfo Martinez Perez
11 years ago
Featured
Percentage, no cap (the cap lowers the percentage of the highest earners: the opposite of fair; it defeats the point of making it percentage based)
M
Maya Sigel
11 years ago
I am completely in favor of this system, I think it's proven to work really well for 829.
M
Maya Sigel
11 years ago
I am completely in favor of this system, I think it's proven to work really well for 829.
S
Susan Chan
11 years ago
I think this is a great idea.
S
Susan Chan
11 years ago
I think this is a great idea.
A
Anthony Cowley
11 years ago
Good idea, good work Tom
A
Anthony Cowley
11 years ago
Good idea, good work Tom
D
Dan Yarhi
11 years ago
Presently on honourable with drawl due to lack of work
D
Dan Yarhi
11 years ago
Presently on honourable with drawl due to lack of work
I am for a study of the current dues assessment as it is currently being administered towards a better fairness and equality with our membership. I favor an umbrella baseline dues rate which covers the IATSE per capita, paid at the beginning of the budgetary year. This will cover yearly membership for all to remain in good standing. If you work during any of the four quarters you would pay only a dues rate tied to a percentage of the earnings based on the scale rate of the contract with which you are working under at the time. The percentage rate will be deducted from your paycheck at the time it is earned by the payroll company and deposited with the Union. If you make an overscale rate, no percentage will be taken from the overscale as I see it as a bonus for perhaps your talent , years of experience, ongoing relationships with the company, etc. In the long run, Yes, let us study and come to the table with a framework that works for the equity of all members and with promotes growth within our guild.
Percentage, no cap (the cap lowers the percentage of the highest earners: the opposite of fair; it defeats the point of making it percentage based)
Percentage, no cap (the cap lowers the percentage of the highest earners: the opposite of fair; it defeats the point of making it percentage based)
I am completely in favor of this system, I think it's proven to work really well for 829.
I am completely in favor of this system, I think it's proven to work really well for 829.
I think this is a great idea.
I think this is a great idea.
Good idea, good work Tom
Good idea, good work Tom
Presently on honourable with drawl due to lack of work
Presently on honourable with drawl due to lack of work
77701
77701
87110
87110
Zip code 28804
Zip code 28804
I similarly support this discussion.
I similarly support this discussion.
Zip 90027