Skip to main content

In opposition to the Never Forgotten National Memorial Foundation's monument

648 Comments

C
Chhris Spencer-Lowe
11 years ago

Just no. No way do I or most Nova Scotians want this.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

My fear is that this statue's presence in the national park will change visitors' perception of the park forever, and for the worse. I have no problem with remembering veterans, but the national park is not the place to do it. Further, if this is to built on public land... ANY public land... the design should be chosen by a neutral committee, not by a single private corporation.

K
Kelly Markovich
11 years ago

I say NO to this monument!

J
Jeanne Fay
11 years ago

It's a travesty in so many ways.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

Senior park staff have pointed out this proposal is in serious contradiction to the values supposedly upheld by Parks Canada. It is a disgrace and must not go ahead!~

J
Jennifer MacPherson Juman
11 years ago

very tacky. looks like they are trying to copy Brazil or something. Terrible idea. Canada is a destination for its beauty, a statue isn't going to double tourism figures...

E
Eleanor King
11 years ago

Monuments should come from open competitions and public consultation. No one wants this.

C
Carolyn Code
11 years ago

This monument will be an eyesore in the park and is an embarrassment.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

No Statue! Not appropriate and a waste of money.

C
Cheryl McCarthy
11 years ago

This is a huge waste of tax-payers money. Even if it wasn't there must be a more appropriate place for such a monsterous spectical.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

I'm not even sure how this represents fallen soldiers. And why is it a woman - are fathers not as deeply impacted at losing their sons and in some cases daughters? And mostly for me personally, why does she have to look like the virgin Mary with her hair covered? I find that the most disturbing - it certainly doesn't speak for all Canadians in the year 2015. Move it to another public site and uncover her hair - in fact just make her a giant wind swept pine tree with outstretched limbs!

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

This is insulting to both the veterans and the country and resources they sacrificed to protect. It has no place in a National Park, or in Canada at all for that matter. I am disgusted by this plan.

K
Katie Norman
11 years ago

how can this be fitting for a national park? a park that is created to protect environmental and ecological integrity in a time in our country where conservation is of the utmost importance...and you want to build a cumbersome, ugly statue smack in the middle of an environmentally sensitive area? Sadly, I smell Harper's hand in this, the world's worst climate villain this world has ever seen.

T
Tony myers
11 years ago

Please protect the natural beauty

J
Jodie Malinen
11 years ago

Hideous blot on this beautiful landscape. Why not dedicate efforts to helping those who have returned from war broken and their families? That would be a worthy memorial!

L
Linda Tweddell
11 years ago

National Parks are not the place for private monuments. When, after significant public consultation and debate within the House of Commons, a decision is made to build a public monument funded by the federal government, that might be okay, but privately funded, private interest groups should not be able to place monuments on public property, in national parks, or, in another case under discussion now, in front of the Supreme Court. Public spaces are for publicly funded, publicly debated and approved buildings and monuments.

T
Ted Haas
11 years ago

May the People be strong and smart.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

This PRIVATE monument does not belong in a PUBLIC Park. Perhaps the best place for such a monument would be somewhere along the Halifax Harbour since this is where our troops left to go overseas. If this is not an appropriate place, then perhaps on the front lawn of the individual who came up with such a monstrosity.

A
Andrew Ennals
11 years ago

The ultimate tribute is to keep the land unspoiled.

A
Anonymous
11 years ago

This is not an appropriate use of national park land.