Dear Council Member
On Thursday 21st April 2016, members of the governing Council of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants of Nigeria (ICAN), took a decision to
suspend/put on hold ICAN UK & District Society's planned Executive Committee
elections scheduled for 29th April 2016. We understand that this decision was
based on a petition sent to the Council by a lone 'member' of ICAN UK who is an
infrequent attendee at District meetings & events and a non-financial
member of the District, owing two years subscriptions.
Plans for the elections were painstakingly put together by a 3-member
Caretaker Committee (CTC) appointed by the Council to conduct the elections
under rules and guidance prescribed by the Council and followed to the minute
detail by CTC. Members of the UK District are baffled that the governing
Council can take a decision with huge consequences on a whim and without notice
to the CTC, a body Council itself set up to oversee the affairs of the
District.
It is deeply troubling that a lone member of a District can cause the
governing Council of the Institute to derail a fully compliant electoral
process in line with Council’s own guidelines. What does this say of the
governing Council of the House of Accuracy & Integrity? This decision
undermines Council’s own process which requires channelling District matters
through the Council member that coordinates the affairs of the relevant District.
By this action, has the Council not thrown protocol to the wind and invited
chaos going forward? That a lone non-financial member of a District with backers
on Council can insult the authority of the Council’s official District Coordinator
and have their way with impunity?.
Here at the UK District, yet again, dedicated members to the cause of the
District and the Institute have incurred expenses, bought long distance train
tickets and reorganised their diaries in order to attend the AGM and elections
meeting scheduled for Friday 29th April 2016. This decision is capable of destroying
the District with huge impact on the Institute if it is not rescinded.
It is clear that the only agenda here is to sink UKDS. It is well documented that the 'lone petitioner' and his cohort has set up a rival accounting association in the UK. Therefore their strategy is to cripple UKDS to ensure their organisation thrives. The council needs to wake up and smell the coffee and be savvy and listen to the local intelligence and guidance from CTC, a body they appointed to oversee the activities of UKDS. Suffice to say this decision by the council will only facilitate the early demise of UKDS.